On 2012-11-28 17:26, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
Johnny,
Can you allocate 47.11 as GIFTVX and 47.12 as GFTVX2
Done, as well as SIIRI
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Home delivery, would you believe it.
Saku Setala is one awesome dude.
Sampsa
On 29 Nov 2012, at 17:11, Mark Wickens wrote:
On 29/11/2012 15:06, Sampsa Laine wrote:
Got two free MicroVAX 3400s..
Sampsa
On 29 Nov 2012, at 16:35, Mark Wickens wrote:
On 29/11/2012 14:29, Sampsa Laine wrote:
Johnny, can you register the following node:
SIIRI 47.1113
What you bought now :)
Did you go pick them up?
On 29/11/2012 15:06, Sampsa Laine wrote:
Got two free MicroVAX 3400s..
Sampsa
On 29 Nov 2012, at 16:35, Mark Wickens wrote:
On 29/11/2012 14:29, Sampsa Laine wrote:
Johnny, can you register the following node:
SIIRI 47.1113
What you bought now :)
Did you go pick them up?
Got two free MicroVAX 3400s..
Sampsa
On 29 Nov 2012, at 16:35, Mark Wickens wrote:
On 29/11/2012 14:29, Sampsa Laine wrote:
Johnny, can you register the following node:
SIIRI 47.1113
What you bought now :)
Al 28/11/12 22:47, En/na Paul_Koning at Dell.com ha escrit:
Is Pi big endian? Does KLH10 assume little endian?
Pi is little endian. And, to add some weirdness to this, I have just completed a TOPS-20 boot using the very same binaries...
(It does not use klboot.exe)
Is Pi big endian? Does KLH10 assume little endian?
paul
On Nov 28, 2012, at 4:44 PM, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons wrote:
Al 28/11/12 22:42, En/na Cory Smelosky ha escrit:
Anyone has gone past this?
I've not, but is it possibly related to solftfloat versus hardfloat ABI in some distr
I have built it from sources... I don't think the ABI differences can make any difference. But I could be wrong if KLH10 uses something really tied to the host hardware.
Al 28/11/12 22:42, En/na Cory Smelosky ha escrit:
Anyone has gone past this?
I've not, but is it possibly related to solftfloat versus hardfloat ABI in some distr
I have built it from sources... I don't think the ABI differences can make any difference. But I could be wrong if KLH10 uses something really tied to the host hardware.
On 28 Nov 2012, at 16:40, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons <jg at jordi.guillaumes.name> wrote:
I have compiled KLH10 in the Pi, following the indications in this post:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/alt.sys.pdp10/vHcQ49tjM…
After correcting a stupid syntax error I get a mostly clean compilation, but when I try to run TOPS-10 on it (cloning a configuration that works in an intel machine), I get this:
KLH10# load klboot.exe
Using word format "c36"...
Loading aborted, read failed for file page 1, proc page 0
Loading aborted, read failed for file page 2, proc page 448
Loading aborted, read failed for file page 4, proc page 451
Loaded "klboot.exe":
Format: DEC-PEXE
Of course it does not boot...
Anyone has gone past this?
I've not, but is it possibly related to solftfloat versus hardfloat ABI in some distros?
