On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:50, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 1/10/2013 3:49 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:48, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 1/10/2013 3:46 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
The link was still up I just now remembered that deleting a tunnel does not bring it down in multi net.
Now pings just drop on the floor:
bart#ping 9.1023
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 9.1023, timeout is 5 seconds :
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
Yeah. Turns out the multi net tunnel didn't go down and that was still behaving as my router. ;)
I got a different error though when that happened.
What error?
-brian
On 1/10/2013 3:49 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:48, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 1/10/2013 3:46 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
The link was still up I just now remembered that deleting a tunnel does not bring it down in multi net.
Now pings just drop on the floor:
bart#ping 9.1023
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 9.1023, timeout is 5 seconds :
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
Yeah. Turns out the multi net tunnel didn't go down and that was still behaving as my router. ;)
I got a different error though when that happened.
-brian
On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:48, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 1/10/2013 3:46 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
The link was still up I just now remembered that deleting a tunnel does not bring it down in multi net.
Now pings just drop on the floor:
bart#ping 9.1023
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 9.1023, timeout is 5 seconds :
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
Yeah. Turns out the multi net tunnel didn't go down and that was still behaving as my router. ;)
On 1/10/2013 3:46 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
The link was still up I just now remembered that deleting a tunnel does not bring it down in multi net.
Now pings just drop on the floor:
bart#ping 9.1023
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 9.1023, timeout is 5 seconds :
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
On 10 Jan 2013, at 10:00, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 10 Jan 2013, at 09:47, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 1/10/2013 9:43 AM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
What does show decnet route show as the router for area 9?
bart#show decnet route | inc ^\*9
*9 13 4 Tunnel2 -> 59.60
Dave isn't my preferred path to you.
I have a question for you. This node on 9 that's connected to the cisco, is there another path to it?
There used to be, but I removed the multinet tunnel connection and removed it from the VPN.
What I'm getting at is do you have a split area with no link between the "halves"?
There shouldn't be anymore. Unless SG1 is still trying to link me despite that link being down.
The link was still up I just now remembered that deleting a tunnel does not bring it down in multi net.
-brian
On 10 Jan 2013, at 09:47, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 1/10/2013 9:43 AM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
What does show decnet route show as the router for area 9?
bart#show decnet route | inc ^\*9
*9 13 4 Tunnel2 -> 59.60
Dave isn't my preferred path to you.
I have a question for you. This node on 9 that's connected to the cisco, is there another path to it?
There used to be, but I removed the multinet tunnel connection and removed it from the VPN.
What I'm getting at is do you have a split area with no link between the "halves"?
There shouldn't be anymore. Unless SG1 is still trying to link me despite that link being down.
-brian
On 1/10/2013 9:43 AM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
What does show decnet route show as the router for area 9?
bart#show decnet route | inc ^\*9
*9 13 4 Tunnel2 -> 59.60
Dave isn't my preferred path to you.
I have a question for you. This node on 9 that's connected to the cisco, is there another path to it?
What I'm getting at is do you have a split area with no link between the "halves"?
-brian
On 10 Jan 2013, at 09:38, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 1/9/2013 10:29 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
However! Despite this tunnel being identical to the other tunnels, I am unable to reach the rest of HECnet via the tunnel to him.
Just to throw my own data out there for you, from 52.1:
bart#ping 61.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 61.1, timeout is 5 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 24/25/28 ms
bart#ping 1.13
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 1.13, timeout is 5 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 144/220/260 ms
bart#ping 9.1023
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 9.1023, timeout is 5 seconds:
Host unreachable+
Host unreachable+
Host unreachable+
Host unreachable+
Host unreachable+
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
bart#
What does show decnet route show as the router for area 9?
On 1/9/2013 10:29 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
However! Despite this tunnel being identical to the other tunnels, I am unable to reach the rest of HECnet via the tunnel to him.
Just to throw my own data out there for you, from 52.1:
bart#ping 61.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 61.1, timeout is 5 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 24/25/28 ms
bart#ping 1.13
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 1.13, timeout is 5 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 144/220/260 ms
bart#ping 9.1023
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 9.1023, timeout is 5 seconds:
Host unreachable+
Host unreachable+
Host unreachable+
Host unreachable+
Host unreachable+
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
bart#
Hi Peter,
thanks for your offer, but currently I'm using the GSR as a pedestal for my AlphaServer DS20, so there
is no need for the PSU.
I'll check out the AGS+ next time I'll visit my "lab".
I think there are also some Cisco 1003's lying around, what would be the right ios version to run for decnet?
--Saku
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Peter Lothberg <roll at stupi.se> wrote:
> It's 12008.
I can find you a AC PS.
> I'm not seriously considering running it just for my vaxen :)
Humm, negative waves.. But seriously there is no IOS that speaks
DECnet on the GSR. (In theory E0 cards can do it, but OC3 pos and OC12
POS are the only interfaces..)
> I do have one AGS+, I wonder if it has decnet..
It has DECnet. But maybe only switched by the RP (csc) say 1.5Mbit/s.
> I'm in Espoo, Finland. We did meet once in the Funet/Nordunet conference at
> the Technical University in Otaniemi, Espoo.
That's to many years ago for me to remember -:)
-P
