Anyone ever mess with this?
wonko at fred$ smidump -f python OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my
OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:15: failed to locate MIB module `RFC-1212'
OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:17: failed to locate MIB module `RFC1213-MIB'
OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:19: failed to locate MIB module `CISCO-SMI'
OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:21: unknown object identifier label `temporary'
OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:283: index element `dnArea' of row `dnAreaTableEntry' must have a range restriction
OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:443: index element `dnHIdx1' of row `dnHostTableEntry' must have a range restriction
OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:451: index element `dnHIdx2' of row `dnHostTableEntry' must have a range restriction
OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my:476: unknown object identifier label `ifIndex'
smidump: module `OLD-CISCO-DECNET-MIB.my' contains errors, expect flawed output
smidump: aborting due to severe parsing errors
smidump: use the -k option to force continuation
wonko at fred$
I need to do that so I can convert it into whatever nonsense PySNMP needs.
-brian
On 1/10/2013 4:36 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Well. It works fine now. Wooo.
marianne#ping 33.15
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 33.15, timeout is 5 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 392/429/476 ms
marianne#ping 1.13
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 1.13, timeout is 5 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 180/219/252 ms
I wonder why the times are so high :)
Works here too. Looks like the routing tables probably just needed to sort themselves out.
bart#ping 9.1023
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 9.1023, timeout is 5 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 76/79/84 ms
bart#
On 10 Jan 2013, at 16:32, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:57, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:52, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 1/10/2013 3:51 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Yeah. Turns out the multi net tunnel didn't go down and that was still behaving as my router.;)
I got a different error though when that happened.
What error?
I got Host unreachable before.
Before it was: my end -> VPN -> SIMH on vps -> SG1
Now it's: my end -> Dave's cisco using a GRE tunnel. Anything we're forgetting to update?
Well. It works fine now. Wooo.
marianne#ping 33.15
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 33.15, timeout is 5 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 392/429/476 ms
marianne#ping 1.13
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 1.13, timeout is 5 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 180/219/252 ms
I wonder why the times are so high :)
-brian
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:57, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:52, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 1/10/2013 3:51 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Yeah. Turns out the multi net tunnel didn't go down and that was still behaving as my router.;)
I got a different error though when that happened.
What error?
I got Host unreachable before.
Before it was: my end -> VPN -> SIMH on vps -> SG1
Now it's: my end -> Dave's cisco using a GRE tunnel. Anything we're forgetting to update?
Well. It works fine now. Wooo.
-brian
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:52, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 1/10/2013 3:51 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Yeah. Turns out the multi net tunnel didn't go down and that was still behaving as my router.;)
I got a different error though when that happened.
What error?
I got Host unreachable before.
Before it was: my end -> VPN -> SIMH on vps -> SG1
Now it's: my end -> Dave's cisco using a GRE tunnel. Anything we're forgetting to update?
-brian
On 1/10/2013 3:51 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Yeah. Turns out the multi net tunnel didn't go down and that was still behaving as my router.;)
>
>I got a different error though when that happened.
What error?
I got Host unreachable before.
-brian
On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:50, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 1/10/2013 3:49 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:48, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 1/10/2013 3:46 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
The link was still up I just now remembered that deleting a tunnel does not bring it down in multi net.
Now pings just drop on the floor:
bart#ping 9.1023
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 9.1023, timeout is 5 seconds :
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
Yeah. Turns out the multi net tunnel didn't go down and that was still behaving as my router. ;)
I got a different error though when that happened.
What error?
-brian
On 1/10/2013 3:49 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:48, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 1/10/2013 3:46 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
The link was still up I just now remembered that deleting a tunnel does not bring it down in multi net.
Now pings just drop on the floor:
bart#ping 9.1023
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 9.1023, timeout is 5 seconds :
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
Yeah. Turns out the multi net tunnel didn't go down and that was still behaving as my router. ;)
I got a different error though when that happened.
-brian
On 10 Jan 2013, at 15:48, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 1/10/2013 3:46 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
The link was still up I just now remembered that deleting a tunnel does not bring it down in multi net.
Now pings just drop on the floor:
bart#ping 9.1023
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 9.1023, timeout is 5 seconds :
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
Yeah. Turns out the multi net tunnel didn't go down and that was still behaving as my router. ;)
On 1/10/2013 3:46 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
The link was still up I just now remembered that deleting a tunnel does not bring it down in multi net.
Now pings just drop on the floor:
bart#ping 9.1023
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 9.1023, timeout is 5 seconds :
.....
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
