Sampsa,
I am sure that PONDUS:: does not have Multinet links. I am also sure
that SG1:: has at least 8 Multinet links that are active at this moment.
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
[mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of sampsa at mac.com
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 18:38
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Mapping - getting close
Another with some overlap but less horizontal space:
http://rhesus.sampsa.com/hnmap2.svg
sampsa
On 12 Jan 2013, at 00:59, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
http://rhesus.sampsa.com/hnproto.svg
sampsa
This one looks nicer. Pondus is in Sweden?
------Origineel bericht------
Van: sampsa at mac.com
Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Mapping - getting close
Verzonden: 12 januari 2013 00:37
Another with some overlap but less horizontal space:
http://rhesus.sampsa.com/hnmap2.svg
sampsa
On 12 Jan 2013, at 00:59, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
http://rhesus.sampsa.com/hnproto.svg
sampsa
On 1/10/2013 5:26 PM, Ian McLaughlin wrote:
Brian,
If you need a real Cisco running decnet to point to for playing, I'll volunteer.
Ian
Thanks for the offer, but I have one. Once I've got some stable code I'll start bothering you all. :)
-brian
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
[mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Cory Smelosky
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 09:09
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Cc: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Issues With Virtual Cisco Tunnels and HECnet
On 11 Jan 2013, at 08:17, Fred <fcoffey at misernet.net> wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Cory Smelosky wrote:
I was more wondering why the roundtrip time to 33.15 was
more-or-less
double what it was to a system around the world. ;)
*pops head up* Hey, that's me!
I'm on the local cable co, which usually gives good ping times.
Could have been doing transfers at that time perhaps?
Could be related to me -> Dave -> his other link -> Steve -> you. ;)
We need trace route for DECnet?
I can ping around (don't have a Cisco though) if someone
would like ...
Fred
This may not be a case of anything we are doing. In the last week or so
we have found (at one of the places I work) that the Internet is
experiencing high than usual delays. We were looking at it yesterday
and over the course of the day performance did improve, but early on it
was pathetic!
-Steve
On 11 Jan 2013, at 08:17, Fred <fcoffey at misernet.net> wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Cory Smelosky wrote:
I was more wondering why the roundtrip time to 33.15 was more-or-less double what it was to a system around the world. ;)
*pops head up* Hey, that's me!
I'm on the local cable co, which usually gives good ping times.
Could have been doing transfers at that time perhaps?
Could be related to me -> Dave -> his other link -> Steve -> you. ;)
We need trace route for DECnet?
I can ping around (don't have a Cisco though) if someone would like ...
Fred
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013, Cory Smelosky wrote:
I was more wondering why the roundtrip time to 33.15 was more-or-less double what it was to a system around the world. ;)
*pops head up* Hey, that's me!
I'm on the local cable co, which usually gives good ping times.
Could have been doing transfers at that time perhaps?
I can ping around (don't have a Cisco though) if someone would like ...
Fred
On 10 Jan 2013, at 17:48, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 01/10/2013 04:36 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Well. It works fine now. Wooo.
marianne#ping 33.15
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 33.15, timeout is 5 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 392/429/476 ms
marianne#ping 1.13
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 1.13, timeout is 5 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 180/219/252 ms
I wonder why the times are so high :)
Let's see...an emulated computer running through an emulated router
going down a pipe to a real router, then back out the same pipe to a
machine on the other side of the planet. Hmm, why would that have
quarter-second ping times? ;)
I was more wondering why the roundtrip time to 33.15 was more-or-less double what it was to a system around the world. ;)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 01/10/2013 04:36 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Well. It works fine now. Wooo.
marianne#ping 33.15
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 33.15, timeout is 5 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 392/429/476 ms
marianne#ping 1.13
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 1.13, timeout is 5 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 180/219/252 ms
I wonder why the times are so high :)
Let's see...an emulated computer running through an emulated router
going down a pipe to a real router, then back out the same pipe to a
machine on the other side of the planet. Hmm, why would that have
quarter-second ping times? ;)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
