If you have time tomorrow we can chat about it. I've had great success with it.
-brian
On Jan 16, 2013, at 18:23, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 16 Jan 2013, at 18:19, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
Is there coax in the place? If so look at MoCa devices. Works really well.
Yeah, there's coax, but not in the same room as the /main/ switch There is in another room though that has a switch too. The equipment in the basement is a short run away from the coax splitter down there so that's actually a good idea.
-brian
On Jan 16, 2013, at 17:12, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
Hello!
I'm going to be moving some of my equipment to the basement here for several reasons (heat produced, noise, space, et cetera), and in planning i'm hitting a roadblock: networking.
I've come up with several ideas:
Wireless client-bridge: Linksys e1000 is garbage and doesn't like to pass DECnet or any of those protocols, so i'd either need a workaround or a better router. (workaround being: a virtual cisco tunnel to my other virtual cisco?) (Other router: /real/ Cisco or a another suggestion from someone on this list)
Powerline ethernet: Is this reliable yet? How are the transfer speeds?
Or: Adding a phone jack, getting DSL on the second line here. (installation costs, but would actually be $2 more/month to upgrade current plan + add a second identical plan not counting hardware rental fees, setup costs, and that stuff)
Running cables all the way from the second floor isn't viable.
Any (viable) options i'm missing?
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
Anybody have a snippet of DCL for doing this, i.e. talking from one host (client) to anohter (server) in DCL.
Also any NCP DEFINE OBJECT stuff would be useful.
sampsa
On 16 Jan 2013, at 18:25, Jordi Guillaumes i Pons <jg at jordi.guillaumes.name> wrote:
Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
Barcelona - Catalunya - Europa
El 16/01/2013, a les 21:17, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> va escriure:
I run it with asynch disabled for the time being.
When I try that, it fails to link.
I mean I disable asynchronous IO using the SET NOASYNCH command.
Oh, That solved both problems. ;)
BTW that build error deserves to be reported as an issue in GitHub.
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
Jordi Guillaumes i Pons
Barcelona - Catalunya - Europa
El 16/01/2013, a les 21:17, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> va escriure:
I run it with asynch disabled for the time being.
When I try that, it fails to link.
I mean I disable asynchronous IO using the SET NOASYNCH command.
BTW that build error deserves to be reported as an issue in GitHub.
On 01/16/2013 03:38 PM, Steve Davidson wrote:
PS: My wife was one of the Engineers on the GEM project.
Geek chicks rule. :)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 16 Jan 2013, at 18:19, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
Is there coax in the place? If so look at MoCa devices. Works really well.
Yeah, there's coax, but not in the same room as the /main/ switch There is in another room though that has a switch too. The equipment in the basement is a short run away from the coax splitter down there so that's actually a good idea.
-brian
On Jan 16, 2013, at 17:12, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
Hello!
I'm going to be moving some of my equipment to the basement here for several reasons (heat produced, noise, space, et cetera), and in planning i'm hitting a roadblock: networking.
I've come up with several ideas:
Wireless client-bridge: Linksys e1000 is garbage and doesn't like to pass DECnet or any of those protocols, so i'd either need a workaround or a better router. (workaround being: a virtual cisco tunnel to my other virtual cisco?) (Other router: /real/ Cisco or a another suggestion from someone on this list)
Powerline ethernet: Is this reliable yet? How are the transfer speeds?
Or: Adding a phone jack, getting DSL on the second line here. (installation costs, but would actually be $2 more/month to upgrade current plan + add a second identical plan not counting hardware rental fees, setup costs, and that stuff)
Running cables all the way from the second floor isn't viable.
Any (viable) options i'm missing?
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
Is there coax in the place? If so look at MoCa devices. Works really well.
-brian
On Jan 16, 2013, at 17:12, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
Hello!
I'm going to be moving some of my equipment to the basement here for several reasons (heat produced, noise, space, et cetera), and in planning i'm hitting a roadblock: networking.
I've come up with several ideas:
Wireless client-bridge: Linksys e1000 is garbage and doesn't like to pass DECnet or any of those protocols, so i'd either need a workaround or a better router. (workaround being: a virtual cisco tunnel to my other virtual cisco?) (Other router: /real/ Cisco or a another suggestion from someone on this list)
Powerline ethernet: Is this reliable yet? How are the transfer speeds?
Or: Adding a phone jack, getting DSL on the second line here. (installation costs, but would actually be $2 more/month to upgrade current plan + add a second identical plan not counting hardware rental fees, setup costs, and that stuff)
Running cables all the way from the second floor isn't viable.
Any (viable) options i'm missing?
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
If you run cable inside the heating ducts, make sure it's plenum rated (FT6).
Ian
On 2013-01-16, at 3:16 PM, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 01/16/2013 05:37 PM, Dennis Boone wrote:
Running cables all the way from the second floor isn't viable.
"Not viable to run cable" usually comes down to "too lazy". Not
throwing stones: I've been lazy about cabling too. But you might
consider bouncing the particulars off of the crowd to see if there are
any suggestions for overcoming the obstacles. Wired really is the most
stable and reliable, for all the wireless hoopla these days.
Agreed. Wireless == suck. (and I design wireless comm gear for a
living!) Run the wires. You'll be glad you did.
One possibility might be running the cable through your heating ducts,
if your house has them. Lots of people have done that with great success.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=C76132B0603211E28…
On 01/16/2013 06:14 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
100m
That would work for running outside a house between floors I think. ;)
Be sure to either use a conduit or use outdoor-rated cable. If
sunlight hits standard Ethernet cable, the UV will destroy the outer
jacket in short order, and it will just crumble away. You'd be very
lucky if it lasted two summers.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 16 Jan 2013, at 18:16, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 01/16/2013 05:37 PM, Dennis Boone wrote:
Running cables all the way from the second floor isn't viable.
"Not viable to run cable" usually comes down to "too lazy". Not
throwing stones: I've been lazy about cabling too. But you might
consider bouncing the particulars off of the crowd to see if there are
any suggestions for overcoming the obstacles. Wired really is the most
stable and reliable, for all the wireless hoopla these days.
Agreed. Wireless == suck. (and I design wireless comm gear for a
living!) Run the wires. You'll be glad you did.
One possibility might be running the cable through your heating ducts,
if your house has them. Lots of people have done that with great success.
That poses the challenge of getting the cable to go to the right place. ;)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA