On 21 Jan 2013, at 16:05, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 01/21/2013 03:46 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
xterm worked like a charm with everything I tried. And that with the
default xterm under Mac OS X. I don't know what or how it would be
different under Linux.
Of course, you need to have the proper fonts installed, but those are
the base fonts, which I would normally always expect to be installed
(except I did a new Ubuntu install at work a couple of weeks ago, and it
turned out that the fonts were not installed, so it might be that the
Linux world have finally totally lost their mind...)
The Ubuntu "bosses" have totally lost THEIR minds. Everything else
works fine.
Yup. Shuttleworth is getting money-happy and some of the nuttier devs have been invading Debian for awhile now. :(
I mean, seen that ubuntu store crap and the amazon search in the search box thing?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 01/21/2013 03:46 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
xterm worked like a charm with everything I tried. And that with the
default xterm under Mac OS X. I don't know what or how it would be
different under Linux.
Of course, you need to have the proper fonts installed, but those are
the base fonts, which I would normally always expect to be installed
(except I did a new Ubuntu install at work a couple of weeks ago, and it
turned out that the fonts were not installed, so it might be that the
Linux world have finally totally lost their mind...)
The Ubuntu "bosses" have totally lost THEIR minds. Everything else
works fine.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 21 Jan 2013, at 15:54, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 01/21/2013 03:50 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
I use plain old xterm for talking to my DEC machines. I use
gnome-terminal for everything else. Out-of-the-box xterm works
reasonably well, and all in all I'm pretty happy, but I have loved EDT
since I was a kid, and not having a full keypad sucks.
gnome-terminal from GNOME2 or GNOME3?
GNOME2, the useful one. ;) Technically it's MATE Terminal, as I
jumped ship from Ubuntu to Mint when the Ubuntu guys started getting
"big head" problems and messed everything up.
I love the idea of MATE, GNOME3 is a disaster, and continuing GNOME2 is a great thing. Mind, on Linux I just use Openbox anyway...
Do you have any specific advice for xterm resource settings etc for
better compatibility? I'm less worried about fonts...I'm comfortable
wrangling them, been using X since the X10R4 (no typo there) days, but
I'm not too concerned with maintaining font appearance compatibility.
It's more keypad stuff, and functionality needed to drive EDT in a
high-efficiency way.
That's going back quite a ways. ;)
Yes, sadly. But in my heart and mind, I'm still 22.
;)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 01/21/2013 03:50 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
I use plain old xterm for talking to my DEC machines. I use
gnome-terminal for everything else. Out-of-the-box xterm works
reasonably well, and all in all I'm pretty happy, but I have loved EDT
since I was a kid, and not having a full keypad sucks.
gnome-terminal from GNOME2 or GNOME3?
GNOME2, the useful one. ;) Technically it's MATE Terminal, as I
jumped ship from Ubuntu to Mint when the Ubuntu guys started getting
"big head" problems and messed everything up.
Do you have any specific advice for xterm resource settings etc for
better compatibility? I'm less worried about fonts...I'm comfortable
wrangling them, been using X since the X10R4 (no typo there) days, but
I'm not too concerned with maintaining font appearance compatibility.
It's more keypad stuff, and functionality needed to drive EDT in a
high-efficiency way.
That's going back quite a ways. ;)
Yes, sadly. But in my heart and mind, I'm still 22.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 01/21/2013 06:49 AM, John H. Reinhardt wrote:
Can I have a Cisco route DECnet from two different network segments
through one GRE tunnel? Or multiple tunnels for redundant connections?
Certainly. Just enable DECnet on the relevant interfaces, be they
physical network interfaces or tunnel pseudo-interfaces, by setting a
decnet cost on them.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 21 Jan 2013, at 15:49, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 01/21/2013 03:09 PM, Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman- wrote:
PuTTY has been ported to Linux too? WTF? WHY?!
For one, VTxxx compatibility. Unless one really understands the Xresources
and how to move the appropriate fonts from VMS to Linux, build the fontdir,
reset the font cache and update the font path, PuTTY is a right-out-of-the-
box VTxxx emulation.
Ok, I'll buy that.
I use plain old xterm for talking to my DEC machines. I use
gnome-terminal for everything else. Out-of-the-box xterm works
reasonably well, and all in all I'm pretty happy, but I have loved EDT
since I was a kid, and not having a full keypad sucks.
gnome-terminal from GNOME2 or GNOME3?
Do you have any specific advice for xterm resource settings etc for
better compatibility? I'm less worried about fonts...I'm comfortable
wrangling them, been using X since the X10R4 (no typo there) days, but
I'm not too concerned with maintaining font appearance compatibility.
It's more keypad stuff, and functionality needed to drive EDT in a
high-efficiency way.
That's going back quite a ways. ;)
In this regard, the Mac OS X Terminal.app works surprisingly well right-out-
of-the-box. Xterm on Linux will require extensive changes to get it to pass
that VTTEST suite.
I used Terminal.app when I was still using OS X and it worked ok.
iTerm worked even better.
Try your xterm and see how well it does with that test suite. Terminal.app
can be used to used to see what should be there if you don't have a real VT
terminal. Dave, I know you do. ;)
I do indeed. :)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 01/21/2013 03:09 PM, Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman- wrote:
PuTTY has been ported to Linux too? WTF? WHY?!
For one, VTxxx compatibility. Unless one really understands the Xresources
and how to move the appropriate fonts from VMS to Linux, build the fontdir,
reset the font cache and update the font path, PuTTY is a right-out-of-the-
box VTxxx emulation.
Ok, I'll buy that.
I use plain old xterm for talking to my DEC machines. I use
gnome-terminal for everything else. Out-of-the-box xterm works
reasonably well, and all in all I'm pretty happy, but I have loved EDT
since I was a kid, and not having a full keypad sucks.
Do you have any specific advice for xterm resource settings etc for
better compatibility? I'm less worried about fonts...I'm comfortable
wrangling them, been using X since the X10R4 (no typo there) days, but
I'm not too concerned with maintaining font appearance compatibility.
It's more keypad stuff, and functionality needed to drive EDT in a
high-efficiency way.
In this regard, the Mac OS X Terminal.app works surprisingly well right-out-
of-the-box. Xterm on Linux will require extensive changes to get it to pass
that VTTEST suite.
I used Terminal.app when I was still using OS X and it worked ok.
iTerm worked even better.
Try your xterm and see how well it does with that test suite. Terminal.app
can be used to used to see what should be there if you don't have a real VT
terminal. Dave, I know you do. ;)
I do indeed. :)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 2013-01-21 21:09, Brian Schenkenberger, VAXman- wrote:
Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> writes:
PuTTY has been ported to Linux too? WTF? WHY?!
For one, VTxxx compatibility. Unless one really understands the Xresources
and how to move the appropriate fonts from VMS to Linux, build the fontdir,
reset the font cache and update the font path, PuTTY is a right-out-of-the-
box VTxxx emulation.
In this regard, the Mac OS X Terminal.app works surprisingly well right-out-
of-the-box. Xterm on Linux will require extensive changes to get it to pass
that VTTEST suite.
VTTEST didn't even reveal that Terminal.app fails to clear the screen on DECCOLM...
However, I wonder if I maybe know the person who wrote it.
"The Mad Programmer" is a moniker I associate with a certain person...
Try your xterm and see how well it does with that test suite. Terminal.app
can be used to used to see what should be there if you don't have a real VT
terminal. Dave, I know you do. ;)
xterm worked like a charm with everything I tried. And that with the default xterm under Mac OS X. I don't know what or how it would be different under Linux.
Of course, you need to have the proper fonts installed, but those are the base fonts, which I would normally always expect to be installed (except I did a new Ubuntu install at work a couple of weeks ago, and it turned out that the fonts were not installed, so it might be that the Linux world have finally totally lost their mind...)
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On 01/21/2013 03:29 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
You have a working binary for PuTTY on OS X? I'm forced to use
Windows for work and I use PuTTY every day there. I'd love to have a
copy for my home Macs. Where is it available?
I heard recently that PuTTY had been ported to OS X. There seems to
be no point at all to this.
Open a Terminal, type "ssh <hostname>"...what's so tough about that?
It works fine.
Terminal.app doesn't provide a shiny GUI to connect to physical
serial ports. ;)
Well I guess if people "need" that sort of thing...but then, I
respectfully submit that those are the types of people who aren't afraid
of the keyboard.
Just as you use ssh (or telnet) to connect to other systems, I
respectfully point out that something like kermit is what you want if
you want to connect to a serial port.
Yes, that's what I usually use. Works great.
(yes, I know GNU screen can do it too. I agree it seems fairly
pointless.)
Yes. And if memory serves, screen ships with OS X by default.
screen is (sometimes) useful, but for a totally different reason.
Yes, that, but it can also connect to serial ports, which seems
strange to me. Feature creep, I guess.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Just as you use ssh (or telnet) to connect to other systems, I respectfully point out that something like kermit is what you want if you want to connect to a serial port.
I actually use kermit as my default telnet client, just in case I want to move files around. I remember seeing a script to tie it in with SSH, need to set that up too.
sampsa