Hi All,
I requested access to HECNET some moons ago. Due to family Business
and heavy Workload in my Day-Job I had to pause this project for a
while.
Now as things settled I am back with my SimH/Vax (running 24/7 on a
raspberry pi) and my Alpha (an Alphastation 255 I newly aquired).
There are Decstations in Storage too (these odd MIPS Boxes) - maybe
one of these could be connected too - provided there's DECNet Support
in Ultrix.
What I'm asking for are three Node-Numbers (I don't need a whole area
- NodeNames would be MINE, EMMA and JACK) and a bit of advice with
Multinet. I have only a Dynamic IP uplink and am absolutely
unexperienced with Multinet.
Best Regards,
Wolfgang
PS: This may be double posted. First submission was from a wrong email adress.
--
Ing. Wolfgang Eichberger
Homepage: www.eichberger.org - Blog: 5ewl.blogspot.com - Genealogy:
genealogie.eichberger.org
Ahnenforschung Dauersuche: A(E)ichberger, B(P)ruckmayr in Ober sterreich
Chimpy. Sorry for the autocorrect on your name below - just noticed :)
Ian
Sent from my iPad
On 2013-01-29, at 8:14 PM, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
On 30 Jan 2013, at 06:13, Ian McLaughlin <ian at platinum.net> wrote:
Samosa
I've used the gateway for a few tests and it worked for me. I am considering subscribing to HECnet and dectech through it.
Ian
Which gateway? CHIMPY or the other one?
sampsa
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=9E00749C6A9311E2A…
On 30 Jan 2013, at 06:13, Ian McLaughlin <ian at platinum.net> wrote:
Samosa
I've used the gateway for a few tests and it worked for me. I am considering subscribing to HECnet and dectech through it.
Ian
Which gateway? CHIMPY or the other one?
sampsa
Samosa
I've used the gateway for a few tests and it worked for me. I am considering subscribing to HECnet and dectech through it.
Ian
Sent from my iPad
On 2013-01-29, at 8:08 PM, sampsa at mac.com wrote:
Is anyone (aside from myself)* running a mail gateway between HECnet and the Internet at large?
I remember there being a plan to set up a domain and then set up subdomains for each node, but not sure what happened to that..
* CHIMPY gateways mail to and from the Internet, rather awkwardly though and not all providers like the slightly wacky addresses it produces.
To send, mail to: CHIMPY::smtp%"joe at example.com"
Your inbound address is <NODENAME>::<USERNAME>@chimpymail.com
Sampsa
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=C24402206A9211E2A…
Is anyone (aside from myself)* running a mail gateway between HECnet and the Internet at large?
I remember there being a plan to set up a domain and then set up subdomains for each node, but not sure what happened to that..
* CHIMPY gateways mail to and from the Internet, rather awkwardly though and not all providers like the slightly wacky addresses it produces.
To send, mail to: CHIMPY::smtp%"joe at example.com"
Your inbound address is <NODENAME>::<USERNAME>@chimpymail.com
Sampsa
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
[mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of sampsa at mac.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 20:54
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Returning to HECNET
On 30 Jan 2013, at 03:52, Steve Davidson <jeep at scshome.net> wrote:
GORVAX:: is setup to cover Europe
Well, EMEA, I hope to have a few SIMH VAXen running in Beirut ASAP.
sampsa
Let me re-phrase... GORVAX:: is designed to cover non-US sites as its
primary link. Happy now Sampsa? :-)
Multi-Watch does not care which nodes it connects to. I set Multinet
Tunnel costs lower on the primary link then on the secondary link.
Typical costs are "1" for primary and "2" for secondary. VMS machines
set LAN costs to 4 so priority is given to the Multinet Tunnels. The
tunnels can be anywhere between 4-10 times faster when copying files.
-Steve
On 29 Jan 2013, at 21:04, "Steve Davidson" <jeep at scshome.net> wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
[mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Rob Jarratt
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 18:50
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Returning to HECNET
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of sampsa at mac.com
Sent: 29 January 2013 23:25
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Returning to HECNET
2. Persuade someone who has a fixed IP to run the user mode
router, if you register your IP with something like DynDns then
the user mode router periodically checks for a change of IP.
Is the user mode router ready? I could deploy that..
[Rob Jarratt]
It has been used in a couple of configurations now and
seems to work
OK, I use it permanently now. You could try it and if it does not
work for you it is only seconds to switch back to the bridge.
Oh I was going to run the bridge as well, act as a sort of
connections
hub (Bridge, MULTINET on GORVAX and the user mode router).
What OS does the user mode router run on?
sampsa
It runs on Windows (as a Windows Service) and it runs on
linux (as a Daemon). I built the linux version on the
Raspberry Pi using a flavour of Debian. I think it has been
built on FreeBSD too.
Regards
Rob
Would it run on NetBSD???
I think you mean: "Would NetBSD run on it?" ;)
-Steve
--
Cory Smelosky
http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff!
http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
[mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Rob Jarratt
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 18:50
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Returning to HECNET
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of sampsa at mac.com
Sent: 29 January 2013 23:25
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Returning to HECNET
2. Persuade someone who has a fixed IP to run the user mode
router, if you register your IP with something like DynDns then
the user mode router periodically checks for a change of IP.
Is the user mode router ready? I could deploy that..
[Rob Jarratt]
It has been used in a couple of configurations now and
seems to work
OK, I use it permanently now. You could try it and if it does not
work for you it is only seconds to switch back to the bridge.
Oh I was going to run the bridge as well, act as a sort of
connections
hub (Bridge, MULTINET on GORVAX and the user mode router).
What OS does the user mode router run on?
sampsa
It runs on Windows (as a Windows Service) and it runs on
linux (as a Daemon). I built the linux version on the
Raspberry Pi using a flavour of Debian. I think it has been
built on FreeBSD too.
Regards
Rob
Would it run on NetBSD???
-Steve
If you are running VMS then contact me offline and I will give you a
copy of my "field-test" procedures that maintain DECnet databases. It
makes use of MIM::[DECNET]NODENAMES.DAT. It will NOT update your area!
This is because some areas have VMS clusters and there is no guarantee
that LANACP is used for communications. If DECnet is used these
procedures will corrupt satellite node information in the DECnet
database for that cluster.
It does REQUIRE that SCSSYSTEMID matches the (<area>*1024)+<node>. So
if you have changed areas but have not updated SCSSYSTEMID the procedure
will NOT work.
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
[mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Johnny Billquist
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 13:54
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Cc: Ian McLaughlin
Subject: Re: [HECnet] HECnet Area Request
On 2013-01-29 19:48, Ian McLaughlin wrote:
Johnny
Did you manage to fix the problem with mim not reporting
the full node list? It's about time I grabbed an updated
copy (with all of the new additions) but I didn't want to
grab something that was corrupt.
I've been fighting MIM about that, but for some reason it
just will not cooperate. I have two solutons for you:
1. Copy each area as individual commands (MIM knows it all,
it just seems that the list of known nodes does not list all
known nodes now.
Bug in NCP methinks at this point...)
2. Grab MIM::US:[DECNET]FIX.CMD which contains all the DEFINE
commands for NCP for all the nodes, and run it in NCP on your machine.
I can create command files in other formats easily if there
are any special requests. Just let me know...
Johnny
Ian
On 2013-01-29, at 10:45 AM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
On 2013-01-29 17:22, Brian Hechinger wrote:
On 1/21/2013 5:36 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 01/21/2013 05:20 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
A17RTR:: would work... :)
Hey, that's a good scheme. I will likely do that as well.
Several areas already do that. :-)
Excellent. :-) Would you please remove "GW" at 61.1 and add
"A61RTR" as 61.1023?
Sign me up for that as well.
Please add A52RTR as 52.1023
Done.
Johnny
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or
not-spam here:
http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=0C30
58926A4411E289B1313A93ED0201
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
[mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Johnny Billquist
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 13:47
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Cc: Pete Edwards
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Returning to HECNET
On 2013-01-29 18:35, Pete Edwards wrote:
Ok maybe I need to re-phrase the question.
My ISP now only offers me a dynamic IP address.
My understanding is that Johnny's bridge program is not tolerant of
changing IP addresses. Is that still the case?
Correct.
So based on Sampsa's answer I can connect via a Multinet tunnel and
there's at least one Hecnet member (Steve Davidson) who can
keep that
connected even if the IP address changes?
Correct.
Would that mean I need to move into another area or request
an area to myself?
You need to move to Steve's area, or set one up of your own.
Johnny
Or move to Sampsa's area.
-Steve
Top-posting on top of a top-posted reply :) On 29 January
2013 00:30,
<sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
Well Steve Davidson has built a system for updating IP
addresses of MULTINET circuits - it seems to work pretty well.
sampsa
On 29 Jan 2013, at 02:29, Pete Edwards
<stimpy.u.idiot at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All,
After a rather suddenly enforced break over 2 years ago I'm in a
position where I can try and get back onto HECNET.
I've renewed my VMS PAKs and have a couple of simh VMS
7.3 instances up again.
Unfortunately when I dropped off back then I lost my
static IP, so
step one, I guess, is asking this: What are the current
best options
the group has found to deal with dynamic addresses?
Alas FLETCH (1.100), my VS4000/60 has suffered some kind of disk
trauma during the intervening 2 house moves so it might
be a while
before I can connect a physical system.
Nice to see the return of the mapping project too - rather more
elegant than my own short-lived efforts.
Cheers,
Pete
--
Pete Edwards
"There's a man with a mullet going mad with a mallet in
Millets!" -
HMHB
