HECnet

hecnet@lists.dfupdate.se

5 participants
15580 discussions

Re: [HECnet] Re: [HECnet] Issues bringing TOPS-20 UP (again )

by b4＠gewt.net

On 4 Feb 2013, at 16:45, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On 4 Feb 2013, at 16:38, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: I'm having issues bringing TOPS-20 up tly SJ 0: Status of structure TOPS20: is set: SJ 0: Domestic, Unregulated, Shared, Available, Dumpable SJ 0: [DTE: Bad to-10 BP 0,,0][dte_10xfrbeg: 10cnt left: 4086][dte_10xfrbeg: out of data, no I bit][DTE: Bad to-10 BP 0,,0][dte_10xfrbeg: 10cnt left: 3329][dte_10xfrbeg: out of data, no I bit][DTE: Bad to-10 BP 0,,0][dte_10xfrbeg: 10cnt left: 4086][dte_10xfrbeg: out of data, no I bit][DTE: Bad to-10 BP 0,,0][dte_10xfrbeg: 10cnt left: 332 Is all that gets printed to the console, is that a bad CPU instruction, have I corrupted a binary, or is that a bug in how it handles networking? -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project. Nevermind, Everything's fine after a rebuild of klh10 Or not still lossy This is bizarre. It was fine until the VM host moved to vmware... -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project. -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.

12 years, 7 months

Re: [HECnet] Issues bringing TOPS-20 UP (again )

by b4＠gewt.net

On 4 Feb 2013, at 16:38, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: I'm having issues bringing TOPS-20 up tly SJ 0: Status of structure TOPS20: is set: SJ 0: Domestic, Unregulated, Shared, Available, Dumpable SJ 0: [DTE: Bad to-10 BP 0,,0][dte_10xfrbeg: 10cnt left: 4086][dte_10xfrbeg: out of data, no I bit][DTE: Bad to-10 BP 0,,0][dte_10xfrbeg: 10cnt left: 3329][dte_10xfrbeg: out of data, no I bit][DTE: Bad to-10 BP 0,,0][dte_10xfrbeg: 10cnt left: 4086][dte_10xfrbeg: out of data, no I bit][DTE: Bad to-10 BP 0,,0][dte_10xfrbeg: 10cnt left: 332 Is all that gets printed to the console, is that a bad CPU instruction, have I corrupted a binary, or is that a bug in how it handles networking? -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project. Nevermind, Everything's fine after a rebuild of klh10... -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.

12 years, 7 months

Issues bringing TOPS-20 UP (again )

by b4＠gewt.net

I'm having issues bringing TOPS-20 up tly SJ 0: Status of structure TOPS20: is set: SJ 0: Domestic, Unregulated, Shared, Available, Dumpable SJ 0: [DTE: Bad to-10 BP 0,,0][dte_10xfrbeg: 10cnt left: 4086][dte_10xfrbeg: out of data, no I bit][DTE: Bad to-10 BP 0,,0][dte_10xfrbeg: 10cnt left: 3329][dte_10xfrbeg: out of data, no I bit][DTE: Bad to-10 BP 0,,0][dte_10xfrbeg: 10cnt left: 4086][dte_10xfrbeg: out of data, no I bit][DTE: Bad to-10 BP 0,,0][dte_10xfrbeg: 10cnt left: 332 Is all that gets printed to the console, is that a bad CPU instruction, have I corrupted a binary, or is that a bug in how it handles networking? -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.

12 years, 7 months

mim?

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2013-02-04 21:16, Dave McGuire wrote: I am having trouble reaching MIM from here. I'm bouncing packets off of it periodically to test some router configuration changes, and suddenly it disappeared. Since I was making some fairly dramatic changes to my router configuration, I assumed I had broken something, but I can see several other nodes...just not MIM. Is anyone else having similar problems? Johnny, what's the status of MIM? It had crashed for some reason today. Unfortunately I lost the console so I don't know why. Rebooted now anyway. Johnny -- Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol

12 years, 7 months

Cisco Config Tool Update

by b4＠gewt.net

On 4 Feb 2013, at 16:12, Ian McLaughlin <ian at platinum.net> wrote: Yay. Area 9 tunnel is up: Yup. It's still suffering local packet loss though... hub#sh dec nei Net Node Interface MAC address Flags 0 9.1023 Tunnel52 0000.0000.0000 A 0 52.1023 Tunnel50 0000.0000.0000 A 0 42.1023 Tunnel0 0000.0000.0000 V A hub#ping 9.1023 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 9.1023, timeout is 5 seconds : !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 84/92/120 ms Ian On 2013-02-04, at 1:01 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On 4 Feb 2013, at 15:46, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On 4 Feb 2013, at 15:45, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote: On 2/4/2013 2:58 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: Looks like Brian has to update his firewall to reflect my new IP.;) This is not it? 75.49.13.19 Interesting, that is the correct one. The VM must've been glitching then. Updating the host VM now to see if I can resolve the 40-60% packet loss issue --- 10.10.10.7 ping statistics --- 50 packets transmitted, 40 packets received, 20.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.605/13.890/62.054/16.173 ms This was fine before the move to VMWare... -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project. -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project. --- Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=03EC4DFC6F0E11E29… -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.

12 years, 7 months

Cisco Config Tool Update

by ian＠platinum.net

Yay. Area 9 tunnel is up: hub#sh dec nei Net Node Interface MAC address Flags 0 9.1023 Tunnel52 0000.0000.0000 A 0 52.1023 Tunnel50 0000.0000.0000 A 0 42.1023 Tunnel0 0000.0000.0000 V A hub#ping 9.1023 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte DECnet echos to atg 0 area.node 9.1023, timeout is 5 seconds : !!!!! Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 84/92/120 ms Ian On 2013-02-04, at 1:01 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On 4 Feb 2013, at 15:46, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On 4 Feb 2013, at 15:45, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote: On 2/4/2013 2:58 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: Looks like Brian has to update his firewall to reflect my new IP.;) This is not it? 75.49.13.19 Interesting, that is the correct one. The VM must've been glitching then. Updating the host VM now to see if I can resolve the 40-60% packet loss issue --- 10.10.10.7 ping statistics --- 50 packets transmitted, 40 packets received, 20.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.605/13.890/62.054/16.173 ms This was fine before the move to VMWare... -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project. -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project. --- Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=03EC4DFC6F0E11E29…

12 years, 7 months

Cisco Config Tool Update

by b4＠gewt.net

On 4 Feb 2013, at 15:46, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On 4 Feb 2013, at 15:45, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote: On 2/4/2013 2:58 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: Looks like Brian has to update his firewall to reflect my new IP.;) This is not it? 75.49.13.19 Interesting, that is the correct one. The VM must've been glitching then. Updating the host VM now to see if I can resolve the 40-60% packet loss issue --- 10.10.10.7 ping statistics --- 50 packets transmitted, 40 packets received, 20.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.605/13.890/62.054/16.173 ms This was fine before the move to VMWare... -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project. -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net/ Personal stuff! http://gimme-sympathy.org/ My permanently-a-work-in-progress pet project.

12 years, 7 months

Cisco Config Tool Update

by ian＠platinum.net

On 2013-02-04, at 12:45 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: I'd love to know how you configured this. I like having useless charts generated and then emailed to me if possible. ;) I use a package called mrtg - available for most platforms I believe. The summary page is hand-rolled html which grabs the images from each of the mrtg-generated pages. To figure out what interface number to use in the mrtg.cfg file, I use a linux command-line tool called snmpwalk which will dump the snmp table of the cisco router - do something like this: [root at monitor hecnet]# snmpwalk -v1 -c hecnet hub.platinum.net | grep ifDescr IF-MIB::ifDescr.1 = STRING: Ethernet0/0 IF-MIB::ifDescr.2 = STRING: Ethernet0/1 IF-MIB::ifDescr.3 = STRING: Null0 IF-MIB::ifDescr.4 = STRING: Tunnel0 IF-MIB::ifDescr.5 = STRING: Tunnel50 IF-MIB::ifDescr.6 = STRING: Tunnel52 IF-MIB::ifDescr.7 = STRING: Tunnel53 IF-MIB::ifDescr.8 = STRING: Tunnel54 IF-MIB::ifDescr.9 = STRING: Tunnel55 [root at monitor hecnet]# This shows you that interface 0 is the ethernet port, interface 5 is tunnel50, etc. You need to enable snmp on your cisco with: snmp-server community hecnet RO (choose your own community string - these were just examples). Ian

12 years, 7 months

Cisco Config Tool Update

by ian＠platinum.net

Loads without complaining now. Thanks! Ian On 2013-02-04, at 12:48 PM, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote: On 2/4/2013 3:46 PM, Ian McLaughlin wrote: Small bug - my "tunnel destination" is "1" not e0/0 as it should be... Ooops, sorry about that. Fixed. Sending new config. --- Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=43F8F4F66F0C11E2A…

12 years, 7 months

Cisco Config Tool Update

by wonko＠4amlunch.net

Right. Due to the nature of the way I changed things I broke that. :) -brian On 2/4/2013 3:47 PM, Ian McLaughlin wrote: Correction - tunnel destination should be an IP address, not "1". Every destination is wrong in the last update pushed. Ian On 2013-02-04, at 12:46 PM, Ian McLaughlin <ian at platinum.net> wrote: Small bug - my "tunnel destination" is "1" not e0/0 as it should be... Ian On 2013-02-04, at 12:42 PM, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote: On 2/4/2013 1:41 PM, Ian McLaughlin wrote: Brian, What's the status of your script? I'm using your auto generated config, and it's working great for me. However, I'm not seeing any other tunnels come up other than the one to you, leading me to suspect that no-one else has started using it yet. Is everyone else ready to go? I'm still waiting on Peter, but I can start declaring this ready I think. I just rewrote it slightly to use a db instead of a csv file. This will allow some neat features in the future, including allowing you all to update you info (change stuff, add end-point routers, etc) yourself via a web page. It now also more elegantly handles dynamic IP addresses and makes it easier for me to check those. There is still more work to do, but I think it's "good enough" for now. :) -brian --- Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=69BFCD006F0B11E29… --- Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=0270ABC86F0C11E29…

12 years, 7 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

HECnet