On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:13 PM, John Wilson <wilson at dbit.com> wrote:
From: "Steve Davidson" <jeep at scshome.net>
This is simple. If the backplane has 2 slots per row then it is a QBUS
(/2 variant). If it has 4 slots per row then it is also QBUS but could
be either 18-bit or 22-bit - the part number on the side of the
backplane will tell you for sure. If the backplane has 6 slots per row
then it is UNIBUS.
In the wild this seems to be true, but the DDV11B (a hex-high Q-bus
backplane) existed at least in the minds of the handbook authors
(see p. 159 of Microcomputer Interfaces Handbook 1980).
John Wilson
D Bit
Hello!
John W, do you recall what sort of wire wrapping board you sent me? I
keep thinking its a typical Q Bus one, but is it?
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
From: "Steve Davidson" <jeep at scshome.net>
This is simple. If the backplane has 2 slots per row then it is a QBUS
(/2 variant). If it has 4 slots per row then it is also QBUS but could
be either 18-bit or 22-bit - the part number on the side of the
backplane will tell you for sure. If the backplane has 6 slots per row
then it is UNIBUS.
In the wild this seems to be true, but the DDV11B (a hex-high Q-bus
backplane) existed at least in the minds of the handbook authors
(see p. 159 of Microcomputer Interfaces Handbook 1980).
John Wilson
D Bit
On 15 Jul 2011, at 14:48, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
Mark, typing a few commands is just about allone can do on a traditional blackberry with a screen half the size of an iPhone. Even then the sensation is like watching a football game through a letterbox :-)
Yes, It's bearable on iPhone 4 only because of the hi res screen. The keyboard thing is still a pain though, unless you use a Bluetooth keyboard and that's a little object-defeating!
--
Mark Benson
http://markbenson.org/bloghttp://twitter.com/MDBenson
Hello!
Mark can you provide a pointer to this HP Microserver?
And go ahead and roll on the floor laughing, but I've been tempted to
track down a PDP-11, when I first saw and actually wanted a PDP-8 to
work with. My >father convinced me that doing so would be problematic
because the poor thing had only 8K of core based memory.
Is our friend behind the E11 subscribed here? He'll know what style of
wire wrapping based board I have here. It's designed for the PDP-11, I
think it >>might be the Q-Bus style one....
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
Greg,
This is simple. If the backplane has 2 slots per row then it is a QBUS
(/2 variant). If it has 4 slots per row then it is also QBUS but could
be either 18-bit or 22-bit - the part number on the side of the
backplane will tell you for sure. If the backplane has 6 slots per row
then it is UNIBUS.
-Steve
Mark, typing a few commands is just about allone can do on a traditional blackberry with a screen half the size of an iPhone. Even then the sensation is like watching a football game through a letterbox :-)
Hans
Verzonden vanaf mijn draadloze BlackBerry -toestel
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Benson <md.benson at gmail.com>
Sender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:30:37
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE<hecnet at Update.UU.SE>
Reply-To: hecnet at Update.UU.SESubject: Re: [HECnet] PDP Ignorance
On 15 Jul 2011, at 12:38, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
Mark, running a vt100 80 x 24 screen on a blackberry (not a Torch) is problematic.
OTOH 20 years ago I wouldn't have dreamt of being able to power down an XP1000 sitting on my couch and using a phone as a remote terminal!
Oh don't get me wrong, it's cool that you can do it and I have used it a few times. For basic terminal stuff its great. I have my HP Microserver set up to allow SSH from external IPs via myy firewall so I can SSH there then Telnet into my SimH VAX from my phone :D
On the same count however, a lot of DEC text based apps like EVE and Notes (I think?) Use mimetic pad and F-key functions which are a struggle on phone-based clients.
--
Mark Benson
http://markbenson.org/bloghttp://twitter.com/MDBenson
On 15 Jul 2011, at 14:42, Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com> wrote:
Hello!
Mark can you provide a pointer to this HP Microserver?
I'm not trying to be a smart-arse but Google for 'HP Proliant Microserver'.
They rock, low cost, low size, low power, high expandability HP server. Quiet and cheap and designed by HP's best server guys. Really is a beautiful package.
--
Mark Benson
http://markbenson.org/bloghttp://twitter.com/MDBenson
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Mark Benson <md.benson at gmail.com> wrote:
On 15 Jul 2011, at 12:38, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
Mark, running a vt100 80 x 24 screen on a blackberry (not a Torch) is problematic.
OTOH 20 years ago I wouldn't have dreamt of being able to power down an XP1000 sitting on my couch and using a phone as a remote terminal!
Oh don't get me wrong, it's cool that you can do it and I have used it a few times. For basic terminal stuff its great. I have my HP Microserver set up to allow SSH from external IPs via myy firewall so I can SSH there then Telnet into my SimH VAX from my phone :D
On the same count however, a lot of DEC text based apps like EVE and Notes (I think?) Use mimetic pad and F-key functions which are a struggle on phone-based clients.
--
Mark Benson
http://markbenson.org/bloghttp://twitter.com/MDBenson
Hello!
Mark can you provide a pointer to this HP Microserver?
And go ahead and roll on the floor laughing, but I've been tempted to
track down a PDP-11, when I first saw and actually wanted a PDP-8 to
work with. My father convinced me that doing so would be problematic
because the poor thing had only 8K of core based memory.
Is our friend behind the E11 subscribed here? He'll know what style of
wire wrapping based board I have here. It's designed for the PDP-11, I
think it might be the Q-Bus style one....
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On 15 Jul 2011, at 12:38, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
Mark, running a vt100 80 x 24 screen on a blackberry (not a Torch) is problematic.
OTOH 20 years ago I wouldn't have dreamt of being able to power down an XP1000 sitting on my couch and using a phone as a remote terminal!
Oh don't get me wrong, it's cool that you can do it and I have used it a few times. For basic terminal stuff its great. I have my HP Microserver set up to allow SSH from external IPs via myy firewall so I can SSH there then Telnet into my SimH VAX from my phone :D
On the same count however, a lot of DEC text based apps like EVE and Notes (I think?) Use mimetic pad and F-key functions which are a struggle on phone-based clients.
--
Mark Benson
http://markbenson.org/bloghttp://twitter.com/MDBenson
On 15/07/11 12:44, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
The first DEC system I worked with was a pdp-11/40. It had a CR11, an LP11, one RK05, an RX01 and a DECtape I unit. It did have MMU but just 32 kB core, which was expanded to 64 KB core. That allowed KED to run with RT-11 (V3, V4).
I did experiment with RSX-11D but preferred RT-11. The pdp served in a laboratory, it got an LPS-11 interface later on.
Hans
Verzonden vanaf mijn draadloze BlackBerry -toestel
OK, so we need someone to code a trigger a the notes server to post to the email list and write an email gateway that will process emails and add notes posts. Best of both worlds. Now who will step up to the plate?
Sounds like the kind of crazed idea that Sampsa gets involved in ;)
Mark.
The first DEC system I worked with was a pdp-11/40. It had a CR11, an LP11, one RK05, an RX01 and a DECtape I unit. It did have MMU but just 32 kB core, which was expanded to 64 KB core. That allowed KED to run with RT-11 (V3, V4).
I did experiment with RSX-11D but preferred RT-11. The pdp served in a laboratory, it got an LPS-11 interface later on.
Hans
Verzonden vanaf mijn draadloze BlackBerry -toestel
