I agree! It certainly makes sense to use LEGATO as the other US hub.
It is on the other side of the country and has similar characteristics -
namely Multinet and bridge connections, plus static IP address(es).
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On
Behalf Of Bob Armstrong
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 10:56 AM
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Circuit costs
looks like we could use another big US "hub" just in case.
You can use LEGATO - half the machines connected to SG1 are also
connected to that (or conversely, there's only about 3 or 4 machines
that aren't connected to LEGATO).
BTW, area 59 is also connected to LEGATO - that got left out of the
map somehow.
What's with area 4? It doesn't have any connection...
Bob
P.S. Nice map - thanks! Hmmm... Somebody could write a DCL script to
crawl the network and output the connection data in CSV format, and then
the map could be updated "automatically".
The problem with area 4 is that it is missing Multinet since the change
from BUBBLE:: to SLAVE::. It is on my todo list to fix.
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On
Behalf Of Bob Armstrong
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 10:56 AM
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Circuit costs
looks like we could use another big US "hub" just in case.
You can use LEGATO - half the machines connected to SG1 are also
connected to that (or conversely, there's only about 3 or 4 machines
that aren't connected to LEGATO).
BTW, area 59 is also connected to LEGATO - that got left out of the
map somehow.
What's with area 4? It doesn't have any connection...
Bob
P.S. Nice map - thanks! Hmmm... Somebody could write a DCL script to
crawl the network and output the connection data in CSV format, and then
the map could be updated "automatically".
looks like we could use another big US "hub" just in case.
You can use LEGATO - half the machines connected to SG1 are also connected
to that (or conversely, there's only about 3 or 4 machines that aren't
connected to LEGATO).
BTW, area 59 is also connected to LEGATO - that got left out of the map
somehow.
What's with area 4? It doesn't have any connection...
Bob
P.S. Nice map - thanks! Hmmm... Somebody could write a DCL script to
crawl the network and output the connection data in CSV format, and then the
map could be updated "automatically".
On Tue, 27 Dec 2011, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
1 - area #
2 - connection type (bridge program, Multinet tunnel, phase 5 over DeC IP stack, what have you)
3 - your IP address as used on Dec 27th
4 - IP address you connect to.
1: Area 33
2: Multinet tunnel(s)
3: thrifty.misernet.net (resolves to 72.240.216.74 currently)
4:
TCP-0-19 Area 19 69.21.253.230
TCP-0-52 Area 52 216.15.64.181
TCP-8-0 Area 8 188.220.63.6
Based on what I saw with Steve's email it almost looks like we could use another big US "hub" just in case. Either that or I need to donate a battery to Steve's UPS's ... ;)
Fred
Thanks,Rok. Here's the updated map
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] Namens Rok
Vidmar
Verzonden: woensdag, december 2011 13:11
Aan: hecnet at update.uu.se
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Circuit costs
All list members send me the following information:
1 - area #
2 - connection type (bridge program, Multinet tunnel, phase 5 over DeC IP
stack, what have you)
3 - your IP address as used on Dec 27th
4 - IP address you connect to.
1 - 3
2 - Multinet tunnel
3 - 193.2.191.211 (NUK1C), 193.2.191.212 (RVDSXL)
4 - 188.220.63.6 (GORVAX), 69.21.253.230 (SG1)
--
Regards, Rok
All list members send me the following information:
1 - area #
2 - connection type (bridge program, Multinet tunnel, phase 5 over DeC IP stack, what have you)
3 - your IP address as used on Dec 27th
4 - IP address you connect to.
1 - 3
2 - Multinet tunnel
3 - 193.2.191.211 (NUK1C), 193.2.191.212 (RVDSXL)
4 - 188.220.63.6 (GORVAX), 69.21.253.230 (SG1)
--
Regards, Rok
I had a series of power outages yesterday so my segment of Area 6 is currently down.
Will get it up and running again after work today.
Chrissie, I still need to open that UDP port for the area MultiNet bridge - I was going to do it when everything went off last night and as I went to eat dinner then had to deal with something else it never got sorted out.
--
Mark Benson
http://markbenson.org/bloghttp://twitter.com/MDBenson
WOW!
Now that's scary! SG1::'s UPS better NOT fail! :-)
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On
Behalf Of H Vlems
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 6:16 AM
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Circuit costs
OK, the spreadsheet contains the information I've got so far.
Rok, would you kindly send me your area properties?
Hans,
Marc's only connection is to my network, area 19, via Multinet.
DUSTY::"s address is 19.301. In my listing the circuit is "TCP-0-0".
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On
Behalf Of H Vlems
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 5:45 AM
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Circuit costs
Marc,
do you use the bridge program?
Hans
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] Namens
Marc Chametzky
Verzonden: woensdag, december 2011 3:03
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
CC: Bob Armstrong
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Circuit costs
defunct, no longer active, tunnels (are any of these people still
around??)
DUSTY:: (Marc ??)
I'm still around, but I had lost my connection to you (I think due to
firewall issues on my end), and far worse, I couldn't recall to whom it
was supposed to be connected. I sent out mail to the HECnet list back
then, and Steve Davidson was kind enough to reconnect me back online.
So, since I'm currently connected through Steve's system, you can delete
the entry you have for me at this point.
Thanks for keeping me active on your end!
--Marc
