On 2012-01-15 22.15, Pinocchio wrote:
Hi guys!
Do Pathworks32 includes server part of CTerm protocol?
I mean I can setup Pathworks32 to be a file server for sharing files to
other DECnet clients.
Is such capability exists for CTerm protocol? Documentation do not
mention such function,
but I see one interesting message TNET0005N: Pwtelnt loaded
successfully in Pathworks32 event log.
So I am wonder, is it sign of server part of CTerm protocol presence?
You are confused. :-)
CTERM is an interactive terminal protocol. It is not used to transfer files.
What you need is a FAL listener. And yes, I think that Pathworks 32 do include that.
Johnny
The server part is built in the remote host's DECnet kit. If I read your question correctly that is.
Hans
From: "Pinocchio" <pinoccio at gmx.com>
Sender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 23:15:52 +0200
To: <hecnet at Update.UU.SE>
ReplyTo: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: [HECnet] Is Pathworks32 server CTerm part exists?
Hi guys!
Do Pathworks32 includes server part of CTerm protocol?
I mean I can setup Pathworks32 to be a file server for sharing files to other DECnet clients.
Is such capability exists for CTerm protocol? Documentation do not mention such function,
but I see one interesting message TNET0005N: Pwtelnt loaded successfully in Pathworks32 event log.
So I am wonder, is it sign of server part of CTerm protocol presence?
Hi guys!
Do Pathworks32 includes server part of CTerm protocol?
I mean I can setup Pathworks32 to be a file server for sharing files to other DECnet clients.
Is such capability exists for CTerm protocol? Documentation do not mention such function,
but I see one interesting message TNET0005N: Pwtelnt loaded successfully in Pathworks32 event log.
So I am wonder, is it sign of server part of CTerm protocol presence?
Hmmm... from section 1.8 in the Decnet-20 system managers guide...
SYSTEM OVERVIEW
Each of the following commands is complete.
Command keyword only:
NCP>EXIT
To get to an NCP prompt, you can do this:
@ENABLE
$OPR
OPR>ENTER NCP
NCP>SHOW EXEC
...
--Marc
Hmmm... from section 1.8 in the Decnet-20 system managers guide...
SYSTEM OVERVIEW
Each of the following commands is complete.
Command keyword only:
NCP>EXIT
NCP)HELP
Command keyword and entity:
NCP)SHOW EXECUTOR (SUMMARY is implied)
Command keyword, entity, and parameter:
NCP)SET EXECUTOR NODE nodeid
NCP)ZERO CIRCUIT cktid COUNTERS
A complete list of NCP command keywords follows. The order is
alphabetic for ease of reference. Because the action requested by a
command keyword is related to both the entity and parameter that
follow the command keyword, the functions are defined in non-specific
terms. Refer to the section indicated for a more specific description
of function.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote:
What I do know is that you don't have a NCP.EXE under TOPS-20. NCP is a submode in OPR.
Johnny
On 2012-01-12 00.32, Joe Ferraro wrote:
Thanks again for the replies, folks...
I've skimmed the docs at bitsavers.org <http://bitsavers.org>, but I
agree -- they seem scarce. The docs I have reference NCP, but the tapes
I have didn't restore ncp.exe... I'll keep looking... thanks again...
Thanks for the show exec Johnny... I have confirmed that the tape I used
is DN20 4.0... I need to go RTFM / see if I missed some files on the DUMP.
$VDIR <*>NCP*.*
PS:<DECNET>
NCP.MEM.1;P777700 4 1603(36) 3-Jun-85 16:11:03 DMCDANIEL
PS:<DECNET-SOURCES>
NCP.HLP.1;P777700 1 118(36) 9-Mar-82 04:24:56 EVANS
NCPTAB.CMD.1;P777700 1 276(36) 7-Dec-82 17:35:59 DMCDANIEL
.CTL.1;P777700 1 1549(7) 12-Apr-85 10:05:16 DMCDANIEL
.MAC.1;P777700 39 99255(7) 15-May-85 21:20:50 DMCDANIEL
Total of 42 pages in 4 files
PS:<SUBSYS>
NCP.HLP.1;P777752 1 118(36) 9-Mar-82 04:24:56 EVANS
NCPTAB.REL.1;P777700 14 7137(36) 11-Oct-87 13:11:37 BROOKS
Total of 15 pages in 2 files
Grand total of 61 pages in 7 files
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 6:20 PM, <gerry77 at mail.com
<mailto:gerry77 at mail.com>> wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:01:21 +0100, you wrote:
> Joe. I believe DECnet V4 might be the latest.
I think so too.
> Afraid I don't know the magic incantations though. Checked the
manuals?
Few hours ago, after my first answer to Joe, I've discovered that
digitized
docs about TOPS-20 in general (and DECnet-20 in particular) are quite
scarce. Just for comparison: TOPS-10 software notebooks are almost
complete
while TOPS-20 ones are almost absent... :(
G.
What I do know is that you don't have a NCP.EXE under TOPS-20. NCP is a submode in OPR.
Johnny
On 2012-01-12 00.32, Joe Ferraro wrote:
Thanks again for the replies, folks...
I've skimmed the docs at bitsavers.org <http://bitsavers.org>, but I
agree -- they seem scarce. The docs I have reference NCP, but the tapes
I have didn't restore ncp.exe... I'll keep looking... thanks again...
Thanks for the show exec Johnny... I have confirmed that the tape I used
is DN20 4.0... I need to go RTFM / see if I missed some files on the DUMP.
$VDIR <*>NCP*.*
PS:<DECNET>
NCP.MEM.1;P777700 4 1603(36) 3-Jun-85 16:11:03 DMCDANIEL
PS:<DECNET-SOURCES>
NCP.HLP.1;P777700 1 118(36) 9-Mar-82 04:24:56 EVANS
NCPTAB.CMD.1;P777700 1 276(36) 7-Dec-82 17:35:59 DMCDANIEL
.CTL.1;P777700 1 1549(7) 12-Apr-85 10:05:16 DMCDANIEL
.MAC.1;P777700 39 99255(7) 15-May-85 21:20:50 DMCDANIEL
Total of 42 pages in 4 files
PS:<SUBSYS>
NCP.HLP.1;P777752 1 118(36) 9-Mar-82 04:24:56 EVANS
NCPTAB.REL.1;P777700 14 7137(36) 11-Oct-87 13:11:37 BROOKS
Total of 15 pages in 2 files
Grand total of 61 pages in 7 files
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 6:20 PM, <gerry77 at mail.com
<mailto:gerry77 at mail.com>> wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:01:21 +0100, you wrote:
> Joe. I believe DECnet V4 might be the latest.
I think so too.
> Afraid I don't know the magic incantations though. Checked the
manuals?
Few hours ago, after my first answer to Joe, I've discovered that
digitized
docs about TOPS-20 in general (and DECnet-20 in particular) are quite
scarce. Just for comparison: TOPS-10 software notebooks are almost
complete
while TOPS-20 ones are almost absent... :(
G.
The above tape contains a DECNET.DOC file that states the following:
| 1.8 DECnet-20 Operation
|
| DECnet-20 consists of the monitor and front-end components, and
| user-mode utilities. DECnet-20 resides within the TOPS-20 monitor.
| The DN20 is not required for DECnet communications over the NIA20 and
| the CI20.
So maybe you just need to find the right monitor and user-mode utilities. :)
HTH,
G.
These are indeed the tapes I've used, and I am indeed running the correct monitor...
$VDIR *DCN*
PS:<SYSTEM>
AN-MONDCN.EXE.1;P777700 647 331264(36) 1-Jun-88 21:21:17 BROOKS
$VDIR MONITR*
PS:<SYSTEM>
MONITR.EXE.1;P777752 647 331264(36) 1-Jun-88 21:21:17 OPERATOR
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:53:38 +0100, you wrote:
| 1.8 DECnet-20 Operation
|
| DECnet-20 consists of the monitor and front-end components, and
| user-mode utilities. DECnet-20 resides within the TOPS-20 monitor.
| The DN20 is not required for DECnet communications over the NIA20 and
| the CI20.
So maybe you just need to find the right monitor and user-mode utilities. :)
I forgot to say that the Ethernet is the NIA20 thing. Moreover, thanks to
Marc Chametzky, we now do know that the configuration is not built into the
monitor like in TOPS-10 but it's read from a configuration file which
apparently contains everything you'd need to run DECnet-20... :)
Apologies for this self-answer.
HTH again,
G.
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:32:01 -0500, you wrote:
The TOPS-20 host is presently available via IP - 74.143.35.91:1023. In any
case, my knowledge of TOPS-20 is slowly growing *ex nihilo* ... I loaded
the tapes from bitsaver.org and believe that I am running the correct
monitor... (unfortunately, the docs that I've found don't always correspond
to the version of software I've chosen to run).
I'm sure there may be a newer DECnet tape out there; however, the latest I
could find (at the time) was v4, I believe... in any case, one of my
biggest issues is hardware knowledge -- running `netgen` does not seemingly
inquire about the [equivalent] NIC...
As pointed out in other messages, NETGEN is not the right tool for this
task. IIRC DECnet-10 and -20 share a common code base with a good deal of
conditionals, but anyway the idea is the same. On TOPS-10 once the right
monitor is running the job is almost done because things like node name and
address are built into the monitor executable (maybe TOPS-20 is a little
more flexible on this side) so there is no need to do anything more.
http://pdp-10.trailing-edge.com/BB-PBQUA-BM_1990/01/7-documentation/install…
At the above link (hope it does not get truncated) there is something that
could be useful: in appendix C there is a reference to the AN-MONDCN.EXE
that maybe is the monitor you are looking for. Check the following tape:
http://pdp-10.trailing-edge.com/tops20_v7_0_tcpip_distribution_tape/index.h…
This other tape contains what appears to be the DECnet-20 distribution:
http://pdp-10.trailing-edge.com/BB-H240E-BM_1985/index.html
The above tape contains a DECNET.DOC file that states the following:
| 1.8 DECnet-20 Operation
|
| DECnet-20 consists of the monitor and front-end components, and
| user-mode utilities. DECnet-20 resides within the TOPS-20 monitor.
| The DN20 is not required for DECnet communications over the NIA20 and
| the CI20.
So maybe you just need to find the right monitor and user-mode utilities. :)
HTH,
G.
If it's of any interest to anyone, I can confirm that the Panda distribution is capable of working on DECnet. I just got CALHAN back up and running, although I had to tweak more things than I had expected in order to get it working. I can't even guarantee if I shut it down that it'll come back up. :-)
For reference, in my klt20.ini, I have:
devdef ni0 564 ni20 dedic=true ifc=e1000g1 enaddr=aa:00:04:00:2e:4d
I also set the interface hardware address using "ifconfig e1000g1 ether aa:00:04:00:2e:4d" so that it'd match.
And in my TOPS-20 SYSTEM:7-1-CONFIG.CMD file, I have these settings:
NODE CALHAN 19.302
ETHERNET 0 DECNET
DECNET ROUTER-ENDNODE
DECNET MAXIMUM-ADDRESS 1023
!DECNET BUFFER-SIZE 1467
!DECNET DEFAULT-FLOW-CONTROL NONE
Anyway, it seems to be working. I even did a quick shutdown/restart and it came back online. :-)
--Marc
