HECnet

hecnet@lists.dfupdate.se

6 participants
15562 discussions

Access to SLAVE via LAT from local DECserver - permission denied...

by wonko＠4amlunch.net

On 1/24/2012 8:37 PM, Steve Davidson wrote: Mark, Look at the file MIM::DU4:[DECNET]LATGROUPS.TXT, then configure your DECserver to use the LAT groups assigned to your network. -Steve HE LIVES! :-D -brian

13 years, 5 months

Access to SLAVE via LAT from local DECserver - permission denied...

by jeep＠scshome.net

Mark, Look at the file MIM::DU4:[DECNET]LATGROUPS.TXT, then configure your DECserver to use the LAT groups assigned to your network. -Steve -----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Mark Wickens Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 18:09 To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: [HECnet] Access to SLAVE via LAT from local DECserver - permission denied... Hi guys, My node SLAVE is configured for LAT as follows: Node Name: SLAVE LAT Protocol Version: 5.3 Node State: On Node Ident: AlphaServer 1000A 5/300 VMS Alpha V8.3 MSW, Windermere, UK Incoming Connections: Enabled Incoming Session Limit: None Outgoing Connections: Enabled Outgoing Session Limit: None Service Responder: Disabled Announcements: Enabled Circuit Timer (msec): 80 Keepalive Timer (sec): 20 Retransmit Limit (msg): 8 Node Limit (nodes): None Multicast Timer (sec): 60 CPU Rating: 0 Maximum Unit Number: 9999 Extra Datalink Buffers: 9 Queue Limit: 24 Forward Session Limit: 16 User Groups: 20, 23 Service Groups: 20, 23 Service Classes: 1 Service Name Status Rating Identification SLAVE Available 81 D AlphaServer 1000A 5/300 VMS Alpha V8.3 M SW, Windermere, UK I have a DECserver 90M connected locally, but I get a connection refused when I attempt a CONNECT SLAVE. Is this a permissions issue I need to sort via configuration on SLAVE, or is this something to do with the DECserver configuration. Thanks, Mark.

13 years, 5 months

Access to SLAVE via LAT from local DECserver - permission denied...

by mark＠wickensonline.co.uk

Hi guys, My node SLAVE is configured for LAT as follows: Node Name: SLAVE LAT Protocol Version: 5.3 Node State: On Node Ident: AlphaServer 1000A 5/300 VMS Alpha V8.3 MSW, Windermere, UK Incoming Connections: Enabled Incoming Session Limit: None Outgoing Connections: Enabled Outgoing Session Limit: None Service Responder: Disabled Announcements: Enabled Circuit Timer (msec): 80 Keepalive Timer (sec): 20 Retransmit Limit (msg): 8 Node Limit (nodes): None Multicast Timer (sec): 60 CPU Rating: 0 Maximum Unit Number: 9999 Extra Datalink Buffers: 9 Queue Limit: 24 Forward Session Limit: 16 User Groups: 20, 23 Service Groups: 20, 23 Service Classes: 1 Service Name Status Rating Identification SLAVE Available 81 D AlphaServer 1000A 5/300 VMS Alpha V8.3 M SW, Windermere, UK I have a DECserver 90M connected locally, but I get a connection refused when I attempt a CONNECT SLAVE. Is this a permissions issue I need to sort via configuration on SLAVE, or is this something to do with the DECserver configuration. Thanks, Mark.

13 years, 5 months

Is Pathworks32 server CTerm part exists?

by pinoccio＠gmx.com

-----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Kari Uusimaki Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 9:13 PM To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: Re: [HECnet] Is Pathworks32 server CTerm part exists? Pinocchio, It takes a while for me to find the Pathworks CD's. I have an unsorted collection of hundreds of DEC software CD's and I have to dig into the boxes and go through them to pick the right ones. Please have patience. When I have the CD's available, I prefer to upload them to my own VMS machine for your pick up. I'll tell you about the locations when everything is ready. Kari Wonderful! Waiting impatiently! Thank you!

13 years, 5 months

Is Pathworks32 server CTerm part exists?

by uusimaki＠exdecfinland.org

On 17.1.2012 20:16, Pinocchio wrote: -----Original Message----- From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Kari Uusimaki Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 9:56 AM To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE Subject: Re: [HECnet] Is Pathworks32 server CTerm part exists? On 16.1.2012 20:43, Pinocchio wrote: P.S. Do anyone have DOS version of Pathworks in archives? I might have PW for DOS V5 or V6 (or maybe both) someplace. Which one do you prefer? Kari What a luck! Please, upload both! Thank you! P.S. I am not part of HECnet yet, so please upload it on some free hosting like http://www.mediafire.com/ P.P.S. It's my secondary reply to your message. For unknown to me reason first post seems is lost in eternity :-) (I did not receive it via mail list for about half hour). So I performing repost now. And to be on the safe side I am sorry for double posting in case first reply finally would find it destination sometime. . Pinocchio, It takes a while for me to find the Pathworks CD's. I have an unsorted collection of hundreds of DEC software CD's and I have to dig into the boxes and go through them to pick the right ones. Please have patience. When I have the CD's available, I prefer to upload them to my own VMS machine for your pick up. I'll tell you about the locations when everything is ready. Kari

13 years, 5 months

Is Pathworks32 server CTerm part exists?

by gregg.drwho8＠gmail.com

2012/1/17 Kari Uusim ki <uusimaki at exdecfinland.org>: On 16.1.2012 20:43, Pinocchio wrote: Thank you all, for useful information on CTERM subject! While playing with Pathworks32 v7.4 I did found and fixed one bug, which can in some cases prevent successful installation of Pathworks32 at least on W2K/W2K3 platforms. If network card service registry path (mine is HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\e1yexpress) last component (e1yexpress) longer than 8 characters - network card would never be listed on last installation step. So you would be unable to bind DECnet to network interface. Of course there is always way to manually bind them via editing registry at HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\DECNDIS\Linkage\Bind, but this way is not very convenient. Buggy component responsible for this activity is w2k\pwbind.exe executable on installation CD. If anyone would interested in - I can post patched binary (24k) or binary diff description here. P.S. Do anyone have DOS version of Pathworks in archives? . I might have PW for DOS V5 or V6 (or maybe both) someplace. Which one do you prefer? Kari Hello! I don't know, you pick. Now as for accessing the location, that'll be a problem because I only have normal (What's that?) Internet access here. Basically either version will work for me. If you want to make both ones available, then that's okay as well. ----- Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."

13 years, 5 months

Is Pathworks32 server CTerm part exists?

by uusimaki＠exdecfinland.org

On 16.1.2012 20:43, Pinocchio wrote: Thank you all, for useful information on CTERM subject! While playing with Pathworks32 v7.4 I did found and fixed one bug, which can in some cases prevent successful installation of Pathworks32 at least on W2K/W2K3 platforms. If network card service registry path (mine is HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\e1yexpress) last component (e1yexpress) longer than 8 characters - network card would never be listed on last installation step. So you would be unable to bind DECnet to network interface. Of course there is always way to manually bind them via editing registry at HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\DECNDIS\Linkage\Bind, but this way is not very convenient. Buggy component responsible for this activity is w2k\pwbind.exe executable on installation CD. If anyone would interested in - I can post patched binary (24k) or binary diff description here. P.S. Do anyone have DOS version of Pathworks in archives? . I might have PW for DOS V5 or V6 (or maybe both) someplace. Which one do you prefer? Kari

13 years, 5 months

Is Pathworks32 server CTerm part exists?

by md.benson＠gmail.com

On 16 Jan 2012, at 13:43, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote: 2008 adds PowerShell and exposes a lot more admin features to the cli. I've never used it but I hear you can do anything in the cli you can do in the GUI. That came in with Vista/Server 2008/Win7 so it's not really greatly applicable to PATHWORKS. I haven't used Powershell yet either but I have heard its very comprehensive. Mark, The cmd environment is useful, like turning off a pc, say, to make your daughter go to bed. .. I will admit it does have uses. I was thinking along the lines of rebooting IIS every time it dies, memory leaks or stops working for other random reasons ;) When the unix tools kit is installed a lot more functionality is available. May be I'm too fond of ascii user interfaces... You and me both :) -- Mark Benson http://markbenson.org/blog http://twitter.com/MDBenson

13 years, 5 months

Is Pathworks32 server CTerm part exists?

by wonko＠4amlunch.net

2008 adds PowerShell and exposes a lot more admin features to the cli. I've never used it but I hear you can do anything in the cli you can do in the GUI. -brian On Jan 16, 2012, at 8:12, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote: Mark, The cmd environment is useful, like turning off a pc, say, to make your daughter go to bed. .. When the unix tools kit is installed a lot more functionality is available. May be I'm too fond of ascii user interfaces... Hans -----Original Message----- From: Mark Benson <md.benson at gmail.com> Sender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:31:05 To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE<hecnet at Update.UU.SE> Reply-To: hecnet at Update.UU.SESubject: Re: [HECnet] Is Pathworks32 server CTerm part exists? On 16 Jan 2012, at 12:05, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote: I don't think that a CTERM listener exists for Pathworks32. I don't think it has one, at least not in 7.4 that I have but I am waiting on getting XP Pro so I can test the server side of PATHWORKS 32 as XP Home doesn't have the user admin tools I need to make it work. Frankly commandline access to Windows NT wouldn't be that useful anyway ;) In general remote login on Windows machines are not that common. Not sure I've ever seen a telnet server either (but I'm sure that DO exist). Windows 2000 has a TELNET server IIRC. Naturally, I turned it off ;) Windows machines are meant to be used locally, using the graphical interface. Not remotely using a plain terminal. Yes, Windows is generally a graphical environment and command terminal access is only usually used for running UNIX-like stuff largely or running batch automation/unattended install scripts and the like. Remote access *is* quite common in Windows environments but it is mostly via Remote Desktop/Terminal Services or something like Citrix handing out remote graphical desktops. Remote command terminal access is very rare. -- Mark Benson http://markbenson.org/blog http://twitter.com/MDBenson

13 years, 5 months

Is Pathworks32 server CTerm part exists?

by hvlems＠zonnet.nl

Mark, The cmd environment is useful, like turning off a pc, say, to make your daughter go to bed. .. When the unix tools kit is installed a lot more functionality is available. May be I'm too fond of ascii user interfaces... Hans -----Original Message----- From: Mark Benson <md.benson at gmail.com> Sender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:31:05 To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE<hecnet at Update.UU.SE> Reply-To: hecnet at Update.UU.SESubject: Re: [HECnet] Is Pathworks32 server CTerm part exists? On 16 Jan 2012, at 12:05, Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se> wrote: I don't think that a CTERM listener exists for Pathworks32. I don't think it has one, at least not in 7.4 that I have but I am waiting on getting XP Pro so I can test the server side of PATHWORKS 32 as XP Home doesn't have the user admin tools I need to make it work. Frankly commandline access to Windows NT wouldn't be that useful anyway ;) In general remote login on Windows machines are not that common. Not sure I've ever seen a telnet server either (but I'm sure that DO exist). Windows 2000 has a TELNET server IIRC. Naturally, I turned it off ;) Windows machines are meant to be used locally, using the graphical interface. Not remotely using a plain terminal. Yes, Windows is generally a graphical environment and command terminal access is only usually used for running UNIX-like stuff largely or running batch automation/unattended install scripts and the like. Remote access *is* quite common in Windows environments but it is mostly via Remote Desktop/Terminal Services or something like Citrix handing out remote graphical desktops. Remote command terminal access is very rare. -- Mark Benson http://markbenson.org/blog http://twitter.com/MDBenson

13 years, 5 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

HECnet