HECnet May 2014

hecnet@lists.dfupdate.se

41 participants
717 discussions

by wonko＠4amlunch.net

Let me know when you're ready for a push. -brian On May 2, 2014, at 7:37, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On Fri, 2 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote: UDP That'd be why. ;) -brian On May 2, 2014, at 4:22, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On Thu, 1 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote: Still doesn't like you. :) Reloading router: 75.49.13.201 hecnetconfigupdate 199.166.5.172 tunnel-dev.gimme-sympathy.org-ipv4.txt Error reloading router: dev.gimme-sympathy.org :: No SNMP response received before timeout Is SNMP using UDP or TCP? pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from 199.166.5.172 to any port snmp rdr-to 10.10.0.10 port snmp access-list 2 permit 199.166.5.172 All seems like it should be working...perhaps SNMP is supposed to be UDP? -brian -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

11 years, 1 month

Config tool feature request

by b4＠gewt.net

On Fri, 2 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote: UDP That'd be why. ;) -brian On May 2, 2014, at 4:22, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On Thu, 1 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote: Still doesn't like you. :) Reloading router: 75.49.13.201 hecnetconfigupdate 199.166.5.172 tunnel-dev.gimme-sympathy.org-ipv4.txt Error reloading router: dev.gimme-sympathy.org :: No SNMP response received before timeout Is SNMP using UDP or TCP? pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from 199.166.5.172 to any port snmp rdr-to 10.10.0.10 port snmp access-list 2 permit 199.166.5.172 All seems like it should be working...perhaps SNMP is supposed to be UDP? -brian -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

11 years, 1 month

Config tool feature request

by wonko＠4amlunch.net

Reloading router: 75.49.13.201 hecnetconfigupdate 199.166.5.172 tunnel-dev.gimme-sympathy.org-ipv4.txt running................................................................................................................................. failed Well, different error this time. :) -brian On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 07:40:16AM -0400, Cory Smelosky wrote: On Fri, 2 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote: Let me know when you're ready for a push. Done. Try now. -brian On May 2, 2014, at 7:37, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On Fri, 2 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote: UDP That'd be why. ;) -brian On May 2, 2014, at 4:22, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On Thu, 1 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote: Still doesn't like you. :) Reloading router: 75.49.13.201 hecnetconfigupdate 199.166.5.172 tunnel-dev.gimme-sympathy.org-ipv4.txt Error reloading router: dev.gimme-sympathy.org :: No SNMP response received before timeout Is SNMP using UDP or TCP? pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from 199.166.5.172 to any port snmp rdr-to 10.10.0.10 port snmp access-list 2 permit 199.166.5.172 All seems like it should be working...perhaps SNMP is supposed to be UDP? -brian -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

11 years, 1 month

Config tool feature request

by wonko＠4amlunch.net

UDP -brian On May 2, 2014, at 4:22, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On Thu, 1 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote: Still doesn't like you. :) Reloading router: 75.49.13.201 hecnetconfigupdate 199.166.5.172 tunnel-dev.gimme-sympathy.org-ipv4.txt Error reloading router: dev.gimme-sympathy.org :: No SNMP response received before timeout Is SNMP using UDP or TCP? pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from 199.166.5.172 to any port snmp rdr-to 10.10.0.10 port snmp access-list 2 permit 199.166.5.172 All seems like it should be working...perhaps SNMP is supposed to be UDP? -brian -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

11 years, 1 month

ULTRXI-32

by b4＠gewt.net

Johnny, You needed an ULTRIX box to test against, right? 9.5 should work for that. Once I figure out how to configure the guest account! -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

11 years, 1 month

QBUS sound [Was: Re: [HECnet] Parallel computing using DECnet]

by b4＠gewt.net

On Fri, 2 May 2014, Dave McGuire wrote: On 05/02/2014 02:05 AM, Pontus Pihlgren wrote: There are very few PDP-11s that won't kick the living snot out of a Commodore 64, FYI. I've yet to see a PDP-11 with builtin color graphics _and_ sound. Me neither. The 64 probably outsold all models of 11 taken together. That's certainly possible, but one cannot argue that their target markets were even remotely related. Or even aware of each other's existence, for tha tmatter. "Our physics lab was just given a Commodore 64! We can have one user at a time and we have no computing power." "The art department has just received a PDP-11/70!" </badjoke> so it depends on your application and measurement I suppose. We were talking about distributed math apps. Distributed math apps that should GIVE AUDIBLE OUTPUT. I'm told there were, probably third party, sound cards for qbus. Has anyone of you seen one or know more? I haven't. I have a really neat Qbus card with a TMS9918 sprite-based video chip on it, though! That's interesting! -Dave -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

11 years, 1 month

Parallel computing using DECnet

by mark＠wickensonline.co.uk

Might be a long shot but is it worth trying to track down the original author of the article and see if they've got any code lying around? My Unix account has moved with me since 1994-ish so it could be a possibility they have code available. Mind, I'm probably not alone in this amongst you rabble ;) Mark. On 02/05/2014 08:53, Johnny Billquist wrote: On 2014-05-02 05:58, Dave McGuire wrote: On 05/01/2014 11:41 PM, Jovan Trujillo wrote: Oh man ha ha so we are going to do amazing things with 64kb. Like those demo scene guys and their commodore 64's. Alright fractals sound like a good first project for something like this. ...we do have 64kb available right? :) Yes. We do have 64K. However, for many machines, that needs to hold both code and data... (For some, you can have 64K code and 64K data.) There are very few PDP-11s that won't kick the living snot out of a Commodore 64, FYI. :-) But using FORTRAN, we could potentially use overlays and such. Well, overlays do not depend on FORTRAN, you can use that no matter what language you choose. Johnny -- http://www.wickensonline.co.uk http://hecnet.eu http://declegacy.org.uk http://retrochallenge.net https://twitter.com/urbancamo

11 years, 1 month

Config tool feature request

by b4＠gewt.net

On Thu, 1 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote: Still doesn't like you. :) Reloading router: 75.49.13.201 hecnetconfigupdate 199.166.5.172 tunnel-dev.gimme-sympathy.org-ipv4.txt Error reloading router: dev.gimme-sympathy.org :: No SNMP response received before timeout Is SNMP using UDP or TCP? pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from 199.166.5.172 to any port snmp rdr-to 10.10.0.10 port snmp access-list 2 permit 199.166.5.172 All seems like it should be working...perhaps SNMP is supposed to be UDP? -brian -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

11 years, 1 month

Config tool feature request

by b4＠gewt.net

On Thu, 1 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote: On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 05:28:12PM -0400, Cory Smelosky wrote: On Thu, 1 May 2014, Brian Hechinger wrote: If your dyndns updates it'll automatically happen. Otherwise it'll have to wait until later when (if?) I get a chance to sit down at the computer. Have a billion things to do before we head out of town tomorrow. I've updated it. The script hasn't happened though. Ooops, I never set the cron job back up on the new machine. :) Oops. ;) Reason for change: Modified Tunnel52: Cory Smelosky (Area 9) "ip" changed from "75.49.17.245" to "75.49.13.201" Does that seem right to you? Yup. Did the SNMP push succeed? -brian -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

11 years, 1 month

QBUS sound [Was: Re: [HECnet] Parallel computing using DECnet]

by bqt＠softjar.se

On 2014-05-02 08:05, Pontus Pihlgren wrote: On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 11:58:56PM -0400, Dave McGuire wrote: There are very few PDP-11s that won't kick the living snot out of a Commodore 64, FYI. I've yet to see a PDP-11 with builtin color graphics _and_ sound. The 64 probably outsold all models of 11 taken together. Well, graphics cards do exists, so that is obviously not a problem. :-) As for sound, it is just an analog signal anyway, and there are plenty of D/A cards around. ;-) Johnny -- Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus || on a psychedelic trip email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol

11 years, 1 month

← Newer
1
...
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

HECnet May 2014