HECnet January 2014

hecnet@lists.dfupdate.se

33 participants
257 discussions

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

I've been digging for hours and can't find this. I need the DEC part number for either (preferably both) of the two cabinet kits for the KFMSA board, which is an XMI DSSI controller. They are CK-KFMSA-LJ and CK-KFMSA-LN, but I need the part numbers. Can anyone help me out? Thanks, -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA

10 years, 9 months

DECNET-10 in a simh emulated KS10 running TOPS-10

by jg＠jordi.guillaumes.name

The current state of simh allows to network a TOPS-10 simulated machine using the KDP/DUP interface. You need a VAX (or a PDP-11) configured as routing node and with a synchronous device enabled. As far as I know, this restricts your choice to a "full" VAX (I use the vax780) and to VMS 4.7 (I think later versions do not support the DMC without additional software). The gory details: http://ancientbits.blogspot.com.es/2014/01/networking-virtual-ks-10.html Enjoy! Jordi Guillaumes i Pons jg at jordi.guillaumes.name HECnet: BITXOV::JGUILLAUMES

10 years, 9 months

Re: HECnet Cisco Router Config for bart.4amlunch.net

by wonko＠4amlunch.net

Ignore this. It doesn't actually work yet for two reasons. A) I need to setup tftp on myst (and port my code to be able to tweak iptables instead of pf now, boo!) b) none of you have myst's IP address allowed I'm sure. :) I'm stepping away from the computer in a moment so this won't get finished today but I should likely have this done by tomorrow. In the meantime, you may all want to add the following IP address to your ACL for SNMP RW access: wonko at wintermute ~/bin $ host myst.platinum.net myst.platinum.net has address 199.166.5.172 -brian On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:13:04PM -0800, HECnet Cisco Config Tool wrote: TFTP Info: tftp://37.59.44.141/tunnel-bart.4amlunch.net-ipv4.txt Reason for change: Modified Tunnel52: Cory Smelosky (Area 9) "ip" changed from "75.49.5.33" to "9.9.9.9" ! ! Router config for bart.4amlunch.net ! interface Tunnel53 description HECnet tunnel for Dave McGuire (Area 61) [Version:239] no ip address decnet cost 20 tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0 tunnel destination 50.73.179.1 tunnel path-mtu-discovery interface Tunnel51 description HECnet tunnel for Ian McLaughlin (Area 42) [Version:239] no ip address decnet cost 20 tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0 tunnel destination 208.73.57.126 tunnel path-mtu-discovery interface Tunnel54 description HECnet tunnel for Peter Lothberg Reston VA (Area 59) [Version:239] no ip address decnet cost 20 tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0 tunnel destination 199.0.131.2 tunnel path-mtu-discovery interface Tunnel55 description HECnet tunnel for Peter Lothberg Stockholm Sweden (Area 59) [Version:239] no ip address decnet cost 20 tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0 tunnel destination 192.108.200.213 tunnel path-mtu-discovery interface Tunnel56 description HECnet tunnel for Peter Lothberg Uppsala (Area 59) [Version:239] no ip address decnet cost 20 tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0 tunnel destination 130.238.19.60 tunnel path-mtu-discovery interface Tunnel57 description HECnet tunnel for Tim Sneddon (Area 12) [Version:239] no ip address decnet cost 20 tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0 tunnel destination 120.146.225.243 tunnel path-mtu-discovery interface Tunnel52 description HECnet tunnel for Cory Smelosky (Area 9) [Version:239] no ip address decnet cost 20 tunnel source GigabitEthernet0/0 tunnel destination 9.9.9.9 tunnel path-mtu-discovery end

10 years, 10 months

OT: 4.3BSD's sendmail, using a smarthost

by b4＠gewt.net

Sent from mobile device that advertises itself for no good reason On 21 Jan 2014, at 09:05, Bill Pechter <pechter at gmail.com> wrote: Is the smarthost relay taking non-authenticated mail on the SMTP port (not submission port)? Yes. I got qmail to build and work. -- d|i|g|i|t|a|l had it THEN. Don't you wish you could still buy it now! pechter-at-gmail.com On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Mark Abene wrote: If all outgoing mail is now going through the smarthost, then it's correct. You may also want to edit /etc/aliases and run "newaliases" to take care of that "alias database out of date" message. It's not going through the smarthost is the problem. -Mark On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On Sun, 19 Jan 2014, Mark Abene wrote: If you're editing the sendmail.cf file directly, it's most likely "DS" for smarthost. I don't recall if 4.3BSD was using some version of sendmail 4 or 5.65, but if it understands "DS", you just say: DSrelay.domain.com # remaining names must be local R$+ $#local$:$1 everything else DSmercia.gimme-sympathy.org root at madeline:/misc/tahor/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/src: /usr/lib/sendmail -bd -q30m root at madeline:/misc/tahor/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/src: mail -v b4 at gewt.net test EOT Warning: alias database out of date b4 at gewt.net... Connecting to mailer.gewt.net (smtp)... No spaces, and restart sendmail. If that doesn't work, I can dig up the proper m4 macro to edit a sendmail.mc and process it into sendmail.cf.

10 years, 10 months

OT: 4.3BSD's sendmail, using a smarthost

by pechter＠gmail.com

Is the smarthost relay taking non-authenticated mail on the SMTP port (not submission port)? -- d|i|g|i|t|a|l had it THEN. Don't you wish you could still buy it now! pechter-at-gmail.com On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 3:31 AM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Mark Abene wrote: If all outgoing mail is now going through the smarthost, then it's correct. You may also want to edit /etc/aliases and run "newaliases" to take care of that "alias database out of date" message. It's not going through the smarthost is the problem. -Mark On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On Sun, 19 Jan 2014, Mark Abene wrote: If you're editing the sendmail.cf file directly, it's most likely "DS" for smarthost. I don't recall if 4.3BSD was using some version of sendmail 4 or 5.65, but if it understands "DS", you just say: DSrelay.domain.com # remaining names must be local R$+ $#local$:$1 everything else DSmercia.gimme-sympathy.org root at madeline:/misc/tahor/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/src: /usr/lib/sendmail -bd -q30m root at madeline:/misc/tahor/usr/src/usr.sbin/sendmail/src: mail -v b4 at gewt.net test EOT Warning: alias database out of date b4 at gewt.net... Connecting to mailer.gewt.net (smtp)... No spaces, and restart sendmail. If that doesn't work, I can dig up the proper m4 macro to edit a sendmail.mc and process it into sendmail.cf.

10 years, 10 months

OT: 4.3BSD's sendmail, using a smarthost

by mcguire＠neurotica.com

On 01/20/2014 03:21 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: Good idea. I've been running qmail for years on my BSD boxes. Set yup takes a bit but once stable it's pretty much operator less. Send me questions off list and I'll try to answer if I can. Thanks! I'm mostly surprised it (mostly) builds without issue on 4.3BSD. I'm fairly certain this is using the original BSD compiler, too. root at madeline:/: /var/qmail/rc & [1] 110 root at madeline:/: root at madeline:/: dev = 0x906, ino = 195, fs = /usr panic: ifree: freeing free inode syncing disks... 24 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 giving up dumping to dev 901, offset 34176 dump Or not... Run fsck that filesystem! -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA

10 years, 10 months

OT: 4.3BSD's sendmail, using a smarthost

by b4＠gewt.net

On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Dave McGuire wrote: On 01/20/2014 03:21 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: Good idea. I've been running qmail for years on my BSD boxes. Set yup takes a bit but once stable it's pretty much operator less. Send me questions off list and I'll try to answer if I can. Thanks! I'm mostly surprised it (mostly) builds without issue on 4.3BSD. I'm fairly certain this is using the original BSD compiler, too. root at madeline:/: /var/qmail/rc & [1] 110 root at madeline:/: root at madeline:/: dev = 0x906, ino = 195, fs = /usr panic: ifree: freeing free inode syncing disks... 24 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 giving up dumping to dev 901, offset 34176 dump Or not... Run fsck that filesystem! That certainly solved it. ;) Looks like it had been awhile since I completely fscked it. -Dave -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

10 years, 10 months

OT: 4.3BSD's sendmail, using a smarthost

by b4＠gewt.net

On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote: On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Clem Cole wrote: Good idea. I've been running qmail for years on my BSD boxes. Set yup takes a bit but once stable it's pretty much operator less. Send me questions off list and I'll try to answer if I can. Thanks! I'm mostly surprised it (mostly) builds without issue on 4.3BSD. I'm fairly certain this is using the original BSD compiler, too. root at madeline:/: /var/qmail/rc & [1] 110 root at madeline:/: root at madeline:/: dev = 0x906, ino = 195, fs = /usr panic: ifree: freeing free inode syncing disks... 24 24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 giving up dumping to dev 901, offset 34176 dump Or not... -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

10 years, 10 months

OT: 4.3BSD's sendmail, using a smarthost

by b4＠gewt.net

On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Clem Cole wrote: Good idea. I've been running qmail for years on my BSD boxes. Set yup takes a bit but once stable it's pretty much operator less. Send me questions off list and I'll try to answer if I can. Thanks! I'm mostly surprised it (mostly) builds without issue on 4.3BSD. I'm fairly certain this is using the original BSD compiler, too. Clem On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote: On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Cory Smelosky wrote: Okay, sendmail was being a bit touchy. I am currently trying to build qmail. After patching install.c to take hardcoded directories using chdir() instead if fchdir() it seems to progress a bit further. (I have no idea what syntax for fchdir() it wants with this old C compiler). -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

10 years, 10 months

OT: 4.3BSD's sendmail, using a smarthost

by b4＠gewt.net

On Mon, 20 Jan 2014, Dave McGuire wrote: On 01/20/2014 02:45 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote: Okay, sendmail was being a bit touchy. I am currently trying to build qmail. After patching install.c to take hardcoded directories using chdir() instead if fchdir() it seems to progress a bit further. (I have no idea what syntax for fchdir() it wants with this old C compiler). (coming in late on this thread) Sendmail of the vintage you're working with is riddled with security holes, but it's rock-solid as far as moving mail around. It's been about a decade since I've run it, but one thing to keep in mind is that you shouldn't really edit the .cf file directly, but use the .mc files (IIRC) which are processed by m4 to generate the .cf file. One can get Sendmail up and running pretty easily that way. There's a reason it's not exposed to the public. ;) I need it to send all email through frontgate/mercia for the sake of security. ;) If you decide to keep hacking on it, I can probably help; I wrangled Sendmail for many years in a large-scale ISP environment, but I'm pretty rusty at it. I switched to Postfix around 2004 or so. Don't blame you for switching. ;) More modern sendmail seems to be a bit friendlier. The older ones are just difficult to convince they should smarthost. -Dave -- Cory Smelosky http://gewt.net Personal stuff http://gimme-sympathy.org Projects

10 years, 10 months

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

HECnet January 2014