On 2/27/2013 4:25 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 27 Feb 2013, at 16:24, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 2/27/2013 4:18 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
It's a slight shame that the catalyst 2820 can't do DECnet or any routing for that matter. I like that switch.
I almost sent a 3560G to Ian. It can do IP routing. It can do GRE tunnels.
It can't do DECnet. :(
But can it do FDDI? ;)
Seeing as it's a fixed port switch..... no. :)
-brian
On 27 Feb 2013, at 16:24, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 2/27/2013 4:18 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
It's a slight shame that the catalyst 2820 can't do DECnet or any routing for that matter. I like that switch.
I almost sent a 3560G to Ian. It can do IP routing. It can do GRE tunnels.
It can't do DECnet. :(
But can it do FDDI? ;)
-brian
On 2/27/2013 4:18 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
It's a slight shame that the catalyst 2820 can't do DECnet or any routing for that matter. I like that switch.
I almost sent a 3560G to Ian. It can do IP routing. It can do GRE tunnels.
It can't do DECnet. :(
-brian
I watch the tunnel statuses here:
http://monitor.platinum.net/hecnet/
Ian
On 2013-02-27, at 1:18 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
On 27 Feb 2013, at 16:16, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
That would explain why I can't push a config to you. :)
Yup. ;)
It's still running, just not in the correct subnet.
It's a slight shame that the catalyst 2820 can't do DECnet or any routing for that matter. I like that switch.
-brian
On 2/27/2013 4:15 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 27 Feb 2013, at 16:13, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
Or you can go the dynamips/GNS3 route like Cory did.
Which will be back up once my network migration is complete. I'm in the middle of moving things to a big Sun and moving to a /16 internally instead of a /24 for administrative reasons.
-brian
On 2/27/2013 4:12 PM, Ian McLaughlin wrote:
Excellent work! I think this tool is a great asset to HECnet. We just need a bit of promotion now. People are scared of Cisco equipment, but you can pick up a low-end router for $50 on ebay and it gives you everything you need to connect to HECnet.
Ian
On 2013-02-27, at 12:29 PM, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 2/27/2013 3:25 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 02/27/2013 03:10 PM, Brian Hechinger wrote:
The tunnel now does everything in the TODO exact that last one about
only sending configs out to only those who need them.
It now supports:
SNMP is now handled directly in python so no calling external scripts.
This allows for much better control over what happens when a router
doesn't respond.
IPSec tunnels as well as GRE tunnels (well, kinda, I still need to get a
working cisco config snippet to use, haven't done that yet)
mesh/hub/spoke topology. Each endpoint (router) can be designated one of
either hub, mesh or spoke. A spoke will only connect to a hub. hubs and
mesh will all connect to each other.
That's a damn fine piece of work!
Thank you! It's been a blast to write.
Much love to Paul for his python assistance. :)
-brian
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=6C0106D8811C11E28…
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=34324FD0812311E2B…
On 27 Feb 2013, at 16:16, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
That would explain why I can't push a config to you. :)
Yup. ;)
It's still running, just not in the correct subnet.
It's a slight shame that the catalyst 2820 can't do DECnet or any routing for that matter. I like that switch.
-brian
On 2/27/2013 4:15 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 27 Feb 2013, at 16:13, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
Or you can go the dynamips/GNS3 route like Cory did.
Which will be back up once my network migration is complete. I'm in the middle of moving things to a big Sun and moving to a /16 internally instead of a /24 for administrative reasons.
-brian
On 2/27/2013 4:12 PM, Ian McLaughlin wrote:
Excellent work! I think this tool is a great asset to HECnet. We just need a bit of promotion now. People are scared of Cisco equipment, but you can pick up a low-end router for $50 on ebay and it gives you everything you need to connect to HECnet.
Ian
On 2013-02-27, at 12:29 PM, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 2/27/2013 3:25 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 02/27/2013 03:10 PM, Brian Hechinger wrote:
The tunnel now does everything in the TODO exact that last one about
only sending configs out to only those who need them.
It now supports:
SNMP is now handled directly in python so no calling external scripts.
This allows for much better control over what happens when a router
doesn't respond.
IPSec tunnels as well as GRE tunnels (well, kinda, I still need to get a
working cisco config snippet to use, haven't done that yet)
mesh/hub/spoke topology. Each endpoint (router) can be designated one of
either hub, mesh or spoke. A spoke will only connect to a hub. hubs and
mesh will all connect to each other.
That's a damn fine piece of work!
Thank you! It's been a blast to write.
Much love to Paul for his python assistance. :)
-brian
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=6C0106D8811C11E28…
That would explain why I can't push a config to you. :)
-brian
On 2/27/2013 4:15 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
On 27 Feb 2013, at 16:13, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
Or you can go the dynamips/GNS3 route like Cory did.
Which will be back up once my network migration is complete. I'm in the middle of moving things to a big Sun and moving to a /16 internally instead of a /24 for administrative reasons.
-brian
On 2/27/2013 4:12 PM, Ian McLaughlin wrote:
Excellent work! I think this tool is a great asset to HECnet. We just need a bit of promotion now. People are scared of Cisco equipment, but you can pick up a low-end router for $50 on ebay and it gives you everything you need to connect to HECnet.
Ian
On 2013-02-27, at 12:29 PM, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 2/27/2013 3:25 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 02/27/2013 03:10 PM, Brian Hechinger wrote:
The tunnel now does everything in the TODO exact that last one about
only sending configs out to only those who need them.
It now supports:
SNMP is now handled directly in python so no calling external scripts.
This allows for much better control over what happens when a router
doesn't respond.
IPSec tunnels as well as GRE tunnels (well, kinda, I still need to get a
working cisco config snippet to use, haven't done that yet)
mesh/hub/spoke topology. Each endpoint (router) can be designated one of
either hub, mesh or spoke. A spoke will only connect to a hub. hubs and
mesh will all connect to each other.
That's a damn fine piece of work!
Thank you! It's been a blast to write.
Much love to Paul for his python assistance. :)
-brian
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=6C0106D8811C11E28…
On 27 Feb 2013, at 16:13, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
Or you can go the dynamips/GNS3 route like Cory did.
Which will be back up once my network migration is complete. I'm in the middle of moving things to a big Sun and moving to a /16 internally instead of a /24 for administrative reasons.
-brian
On 2/27/2013 4:12 PM, Ian McLaughlin wrote:
Excellent work! I think this tool is a great asset to HECnet. We just need a bit of promotion now. People are scared of Cisco equipment, but you can pick up a low-end router for $50 on ebay and it gives you everything you need to connect to HECnet.
Ian
On 2013-02-27, at 12:29 PM, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 2/27/2013 3:25 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 02/27/2013 03:10 PM, Brian Hechinger wrote:
The tunnel now does everything in the TODO exact that last one about
only sending configs out to only those who need them.
It now supports:
SNMP is now handled directly in python so no calling external scripts.
This allows for much better control over what happens when a router
doesn't respond.
IPSec tunnels as well as GRE tunnels (well, kinda, I still need to get a
working cisco config snippet to use, haven't done that yet)
mesh/hub/spoke topology. Each endpoint (router) can be designated one of
either hub, mesh or spoke. A spoke will only connect to a hub. hubs and
mesh will all connect to each other.
That's a damn fine piece of work!
Thank you! It's been a blast to write.
Much love to Paul for his python assistance. :)
-brian
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=6C0106D8811C11E28…
On 27 Feb 2013, at 16:12, Ian McLaughlin <ian at platinum.net> wrote:
Excellent work! I think this tool is a great asset to HECnet. We just need a bit of promotion now. People are scared of Cisco equipment, but you can pick up a low-end router for $50 on ebay and it gives you everything you need to connect to HECnet.
Yes, Excellent work!
Well, I need a Cisco 7200 chassis. Those are a bit more than $50. ;)
Ian
On 2013-02-27, at 12:29 PM, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 2/27/2013 3:25 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 02/27/2013 03:10 PM, Brian Hechinger wrote:
The tunnel now does everything in the TODO exact that last one about
only sending configs out to only those who need them.
It now supports:
SNMP is now handled directly in python so no calling external scripts.
This allows for much better control over what happens when a router
doesn't respond.
IPSec tunnels as well as GRE tunnels (well, kinda, I still need to get a
working cisco config snippet to use, haven't done that yet)
mesh/hub/spoke topology. Each endpoint (router) can be designated one of
either hub, mesh or spoke. A spoke will only connect to a hub. hubs and
mesh will all connect to each other.
That's a damn fine piece of work!
Thank you! It's been a blast to write.
Much love to Paul for his python assistance. :)
-brian
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=6C0106D8811C11E28…
Or you can go the dynamips/GNS3 route like Cory did.
-brian
On 2/27/2013 4:12 PM, Ian McLaughlin wrote:
Excellent work! I think this tool is a great asset to HECnet. We just need a bit of promotion now. People are scared of Cisco equipment, but you can pick up a low-end router for $50 on ebay and it gives you everything you need to connect to HECnet.
Ian
On 2013-02-27, at 12:29 PM, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 2/27/2013 3:25 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 02/27/2013 03:10 PM, Brian Hechinger wrote:
The tunnel now does everything in the TODO exact that last one about
only sending configs out to only those who need them.
It now supports:
SNMP is now handled directly in python so no calling external scripts.
This allows for much better control over what happens when a router
doesn't respond.
IPSec tunnels as well as GRE tunnels (well, kinda, I still need to get a
working cisco config snippet to use, haven't done that yet)
mesh/hub/spoke topology. Each endpoint (router) can be designated one of
either hub, mesh or spoke. A spoke will only connect to a hub. hubs and
mesh will all connect to each other.
That's a damn fine piece of work!
Thank you! It's been a blast to write.
Much love to Paul for his python assistance. :)
-brian
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=6C0106D8811C11E28…
Excellent work! I think this tool is a great asset to HECnet. We just need a bit of promotion now. People are scared of Cisco equipment, but you can pick up a low-end router for $50 on ebay and it gives you everything you need to connect to HECnet.
Ian
On 2013-02-27, at 12:29 PM, Brian Hechinger <wonko at 4amlunch.net> wrote:
On 2/27/2013 3:25 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 02/27/2013 03:10 PM, Brian Hechinger wrote:
The tunnel now does everything in the TODO exact that last one about
only sending configs out to only those who need them.
It now supports:
SNMP is now handled directly in python so no calling external scripts.
This allows for much better control over what happens when a router
doesn't respond.
IPSec tunnels as well as GRE tunnels (well, kinda, I still need to get a
working cisco config snippet to use, haven't done that yet)
mesh/hub/spoke topology. Each endpoint (router) can be designated one of
either hub, mesh or spoke. A spoke will only connect to a hub. hubs and
mesh will all connect to each other.
That's a damn fine piece of work!
Thank you! It's been a blast to write.
Much love to Paul for his python assistance. :)
-brian
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here: http://my.email-as.net/spamham/cgi-bin/learn.pl?messageid=6C0106D8811C11E28…
