Tried to compile my little program on GORVAX but it has problems with the SCREEN SECTION that works on the AXP version..
I'm thinking I must have an old compiler or something. Anyone know what the latest is?
Anyone have a kit?
Sampsa
On Sep 12, 2012, at 9:57 AM, Sampsa Laine wrote:
By the way, the project I'm working on (just to practice my COBOL + DCL) is a little VMS-based conferencing / email system.
Try it by logging in as CBLBRD on CHIMPY. The username / password for the board is hecnet / test.
Sampsa
I'm trying to remember if DEC ever put out interesting applications that were written in Cobol. I'm not sure. I do remember a friend of mine who wrote an expression parser (RPN generator) in Cobol. Or maybe RPG? I'm not sure that's possible.
I do remember that the first release of VAX Notes was written in PL/I and started out as an exercise in learning PL/I for the author (Len Kawell).
paul
By the way, the project I'm working on (just to practice my COBOL + DCL) is a little VMS-based conferencing / email system.
Try it by logging in as CBLBRD on CHIMPY. The username / password for the board is hecnet / test.
Sampsa
I figured it out, had to do with the DELIMITED BY SIZE issue - the old buffer was overwriting the whole new one, thus nothing was ever being stored.
I added a delimiter literal and it works now, code looks like this if interested (||||) is the delimiter:
GetPayload.
MOVE "||||" TO Payload.
Move " " TO EditLine.
PERFORM UNTIL EditLine = "."
DISPLAY "> " WITH NO ADVANCING
ACCEPT EditLine
MOVE Payload TO PreviousPayload
STRING PreviousPayload DELIMITED BY "||||"
CRLF DELIMITED BY SIZE
EditLine DELIMITED BY SIZE
"||||" DELIMITED BY SIZE
INTO NewPayload
END-STRING
MOVE NewPayload TO Payload
END-PERFORM.
DISPLAY "<EOT>".
On 12 Sep 2012, at 16:35, Dennis Boone wrote:
Nothing seems to happen, however.
I assume you don't mean that literally.
De
I'm trying to read multiple lines of input and concatenate them into one string, separated by CRLF's.
This is the code I have:
GetPayload.
MOVE " " TO Payload.
Move " " TO EditLine.
PERFORM UNTIL EditLine = "."
DISPLAY "> " WITH NO ADVANCING
ACCEPT EditLine
STRING Payload DELIMITED BY SIZE
x"0a0d" DELIMITED BY SIZE
EditLine DELIMITED BY SIZE
INTO NewPayload
END-STRING
MOVE NewPayload TO Payload
END-PERFORM.
Nothing seems to happen, however. Any ideas?
Sampsa
OK, there are two new changesets. One to fix the missing update and one to
fix the warnings on format strings.
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Mark Wickens
Sent: 09 September 2012 08:13
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE; mark at wickensonline.co.uk
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For Testing
Rob,
I had a go compiling version 15891
<https://route20.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/15891> of the
source code under Ubuntu 12.04.
I downloaded and built version 1.3.0 of libpcap.
I got the following compiler error. Are there some changes you need to
commit to the repository?
Regards, Mark.
<https://route20.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/15891>msw at x60:
~/Downloads/Main/Route20$
OS_CCDEFS="-I/usr/local/include" OS_LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib" make cc -
I . -I/usr/local/include adjacency.c area_forwarding_database.c
area_routing_database.c circuit.c decision.c decnet.c dns.c eth_circuit.c
eth_decnet.c eth_init_layer.c eth_pcap.c eth_sock.c forwarding.c
forwarding_database.c init_layer.c linux.c messages.c node.c packet.c
route20.c routing_database.c socket.c timer.c update.c -o route20 -
L/usr/local/lib -lpcap
circuit.c: In function 'CircuitCreateEthernetPcap':
circuit.c:65:9: error: 'struct circuit' has no member named
'nextLevel1Node'
circuit.c: In function 'CircuitCreateEthernetSocket':
circuit.c:84:9: error: 'struct circuit' has no member named
'nextLevel1Node'
decision.c: In function 'DumpHeading':
decision.c:214:2: warning: format not a string literal and no format
arguments [-Wformat-security]
decision.c:222:2: warning: format not a string literal and no format
arguments [-Wformat-security]
decision.c:230:2: warning: format not a string literal and no format
arguments [-Wformat-security]
linux.c: In function 'Log':
linux.c:157:6: warning: format not a string literal and no format
arguments
[-Wformat-security]
update.c: In function 'ProcessCircuitLevel1Update':
update.c:82:25: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node'
update.c:86:53: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node'
update.c:89:50: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node'
update.c:100:10: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node'
update.c:100:37: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node'
update.c:102:16: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node'
update.c:105:9: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node'
update.c:105:36: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node'
make: *** [route20] Error 1
On 09/09/12 00:07, Rob Jarratt wrote:
The source code has been updated on CodePlex to fix both issues. It
now generates level 1 routing messages, so will work correctly if you
have level
1 routers in your area. It also handles unreachable nodes in its own
area correctly now.
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-
hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Rob Jarratt
Sent: 08 September 2012 16:43
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For
Testing
I have already realised that there is at least one deficiency. If you
have
any
Level 1 routers in your area then it isn't going to work properly
because
it
doesn't send out Level 1 Routing messages (but it does process the
ones it receives). I have also had a report that when nodes in my
area are not reachable, you get a timeout instead of an "unreachable"
error.
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-
hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Rob Jarratt
Sent: 08 September 2012 14:12
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For
Testing
If you want to try routing directly to me, my config is
jarratt.dyndns.org:4711. I will need to know your details for the
link to
work.
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-
hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Brian Hechinger
Sent: 08 September 2012 12:35
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For
Testing
Excellent! I'll download and play when I have some free time!!
-brian
On Sep 8, 2012, at 4:04, "Rob Jarratt"
<robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com>
wrote:
I have published everything up on CodePlex now. Here is the link:
https://route20.codeplex.com/
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-
hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Brian Hechinger
Sent: 08 September 2012 00:38
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For
Testing
Ok, but where do we find the source? :)
-brian
On 9/7/2012 6:36 PM, Rob Jarratt wrote:
I am ready for a couple of people to try out the user mode
DECnet router I have been writing. Is anyone interested in
trying
it
out?
You will need to be able to compile C code and have pcap or
winpcap installed.
Here is an extract from the README:
User Mode DECnet Router Readme
==============================
This program is a DECnet router that implements version 2.0 of
the DECnet routing specification found here:
http://linux-decnet.sourceforge.net/docs/route20.txt
Features
--------
1. Runs on Windows either as a Windows Service, or as a console
program.
2. Runs on Linux as a daemon.
3. Full routing capability, so it avoids broadcasting all
routing messages to
entire network and kills looping packets.
4. Supports Ethernet (using pcap/winpcap).
5. Supports Johnny's bridge.
6. Can be extended to support other kinds of circuit (Cisco and
Multinet might
be examples, not tried).
7. Does dynamic DNS updates without blocking.
Limitations
-----------
1. Only tested on Windows Server 2003 and Raspberry Pi running
Debian.
2. Does not support Phase III nodes.
3. Although it can be configured as a Level 1 node, Level 1 is
not
fully
supported. It has only been tested as a Level 2 (area
router)
node.
4. Limited testing on Raspberry Pi.
5. Performance not tested.
6. Not tested with multiple ethernets.
7. Limited testing with multiple bridges.
Regards
Rob
--
http://www.wickensonline.co.ukhttp://declegacy.org.ukhttp://retrochallenge.nethttps://twitter.com/#!/%40urbancamo
You are right, there seem to be some changes missing in the repository. Let
me check and sort it out.
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Mark Wickens
Sent: 09 September 2012 08:13
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE; mark at wickensonline.co.uk
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For Testing
Rob,
I had a go compiling version 15891
<https://route20.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/15891> of the
source code under Ubuntu 12.04.
I downloaded and built version 1.3.0 of libpcap.
I got the following compiler error. Are there some changes you need to
commit to the repository?
Regards, Mark.
<https://route20.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/15891>msw at x60:
~/Downloads/Main/Route20$
OS_CCDEFS="-I/usr/local/include" OS_LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib" make cc -
I . -I/usr/local/include adjacency.c area_forwarding_database.c
area_routing_database.c circuit.c decision.c decnet.c dns.c eth_circuit.c
eth_decnet.c eth_init_layer.c eth_pcap.c eth_sock.c forwarding.c
forwarding_database.c init_layer.c linux.c messages.c node.c packet.c
route20.c routing_database.c socket.c timer.c update.c -o route20 -
L/usr/local/lib -lpcap
circuit.c: In function 'CircuitCreateEthernetPcap':
circuit.c:65:9: error: 'struct circuit' has no member named
'nextLevel1Node'
circuit.c: In function 'CircuitCreateEthernetSocket':
circuit.c:84:9: error: 'struct circuit' has no member named
'nextLevel1Node'
decision.c: In function 'DumpHeading':
decision.c:214:2: warning: format not a string literal and no format
arguments [-Wformat-security]
decision.c:222:2: warning: format not a string literal and no format
arguments [-Wformat-security]
decision.c:230:2: warning: format not a string literal and no format
arguments [-Wformat-security]
linux.c: In function 'Log':
linux.c:157:6: warning: format not a string literal and no format
arguments
[-Wformat-security]
update.c: In function 'ProcessCircuitLevel1Update':
update.c:82:25: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node'
update.c:86:53: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node'
update.c:89:50: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node'
update.c:100:10: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node'
update.c:100:37: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node'
update.c:102:16: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node'
update.c:105:9: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node'
update.c:105:36: error: 'circuit_t' has no member named 'nextLevel1Node'
make: *** [route20] Error 1
On 09/09/12 00:07, Rob Jarratt wrote:
The source code has been updated on CodePlex to fix both issues. It
now generates level 1 routing messages, so will work correctly if you
have level
1 routers in your area. It also handles unreachable nodes in its own
area correctly now.
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-
hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Rob Jarratt
Sent: 08 September 2012 16:43
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For
Testing
I have already realised that there is at least one deficiency. If you
have
any
Level 1 routers in your area then it isn't going to work properly
because
it
doesn't send out Level 1 Routing messages (but it does process the
ones it receives). I have also had a report that when nodes in my
area are not reachable, you get a timeout instead of an "unreachable"
error.
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-
hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Rob Jarratt
Sent: 08 September 2012 14:12
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For
Testing
If you want to try routing directly to me, my config is
jarratt.dyndns.org:4711. I will need to know your details for the
link to
work.
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-
hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Brian Hechinger
Sent: 08 September 2012 12:35
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For
Testing
Excellent! I'll download and play when I have some free time!!
-brian
On Sep 8, 2012, at 4:04, "Rob Jarratt"
<robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com>
wrote:
I have published everything up on CodePlex now. Here is the link:
https://route20.codeplex.com/
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-
hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Brian Hechinger
Sent: 08 September 2012 00:38
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For
Testing
Ok, but where do we find the source? :)
-brian
On 9/7/2012 6:36 PM, Rob Jarratt wrote:
I am ready for a couple of people to try out the user mode
DECnet router I have been writing. Is anyone interested in
trying
it
out?
You will need to be able to compile C code and have pcap or
winpcap installed.
Here is an extract from the README:
User Mode DECnet Router Readme
==============================
This program is a DECnet router that implements version 2.0 of
the DECnet routing specification found here:
http://linux-decnet.sourceforge.net/docs/route20.txt
Features
--------
1. Runs on Windows either as a Windows Service, or as a console
program.
2. Runs on Linux as a daemon.
3. Full routing capability, so it avoids broadcasting all
routing messages to
entire network and kills looping packets.
4. Supports Ethernet (using pcap/winpcap).
5. Supports Johnny's bridge.
6. Can be extended to support other kinds of circuit (Cisco and
Multinet might
be examples, not tried).
7. Does dynamic DNS updates without blocking.
Limitations
-----------
1. Only tested on Windows Server 2003 and Raspberry Pi running
Debian.
2. Does not support Phase III nodes.
3. Although it can be configured as a Level 1 node, Level 1 is
not
fully
supported. It has only been tested as a Level 2 (area
router)
node.
4. Limited testing on Raspberry Pi.
5. Performance not tested.
6. Not tested with multiple ethernets.
7. Limited testing with multiple bridges.
Regards
Rob
--
http://www.wickensonline.co.ukhttp://declegacy.org.ukhttp://retrochallenge.nethttps://twitter.com/#!/%40urbancamo
Rob,
I had a go compiling version 15891 <https://route20.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/15891> of the source code under Ubuntu 12.04.
I downloaded and built version 1.3.0 of libpcap.
I got the following compiler error. Are there some changes you need to commit to the repository?
Regards, Mark.
<https://route20.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/15891>msw at x60:~/Downloads/Main/Route20$ OS_CCDEFS="-I/usr/local/include" OS_LDFLAGS="-L/usr/local/lib" make
cc -I . -I/usr/local/include adjacency.c area_forwarding_database.c area_routing_database.c circuit.c decision.c decnet.c dns.c eth_circuit.c eth_decnet.c eth_init_layer.c eth_pcap.c eth_sock.c forwarding.c forwarding_database.c init_layer.c linux.c messages.c node.c packet.c route20.c routing_database.c socket.c timer.c update.c -o route20 -L/usr/local/lib -lpcap
circuit.c: In function CircuitCreateEthernetPcap :
circuit.c:65:9: error: struct circuit has no member named nextLevel1Node
circuit.c: In function CircuitCreateEthernetSocket :
circuit.c:84:9: error: struct circuit has no member named nextLevel1Node
decision.c: In function DumpHeading :
decision.c:214:2: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Wformat-security]
decision.c:222:2: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Wformat-security]
decision.c:230:2: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Wformat-security]
linux.c: In function Log :
linux.c:157:6: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Wformat-security]
update.c: In function ProcessCircuitLevel1Update :
update.c:82:25: error: circuit_t has no member named nextLevel1Node
update.c:86:53: error: circuit_t has no member named nextLevel1Node
update.c:89:50: error: circuit_t has no member named nextLevel1Node
update.c:100:10: error: circuit_t has no member named nextLevel1Node
update.c:100:37: error: circuit_t has no member named nextLevel1Node
update.c:102:16: error: circuit_t has no member named nextLevel1Node
update.c:105:9: error: circuit_t has no member named nextLevel1Node
update.c:105:36: error: circuit_t has no member named nextLevel1Node
make: *** [route20] Error 1
On 09/09/12 00:07, Rob Jarratt wrote:
The source code has been updated on CodePlex to fix both issues. It now
generates level 1 routing messages, so will work correctly if you have level
1 routers in your area. It also handles unreachable nodes in its own area
correctly now.
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Rob Jarratt
Sent: 08 September 2012 16:43
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For Testing
I have already realised that there is at least one deficiency. If you have
any
Level 1 routers in your area then it isn't going to work properly because
it
doesn't send out Level 1 Routing messages (but it does process the ones it
receives). I have also had a report that when nodes in my area are not
reachable, you get a timeout instead of an "unreachable" error.
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-
hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Rob Jarratt
Sent: 08 September 2012 14:12
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For
Testing
If you want to try routing directly to me, my config is
jarratt.dyndns.org:4711. I will need to know your details for the link
to
work.
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-
hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Brian Hechinger
Sent: 08 September 2012 12:35
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For
Testing
Excellent! I'll download and play when I have some free time!!
-brian
On Sep 8, 2012, at 4:04, "Rob Jarratt" <robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com>
wrote:
I have published everything up on CodePlex now. Here is the link:
https://route20.codeplex.com/
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-
hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Brian Hechinger
Sent: 08 September 2012 00:38
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For
Testing
Ok, but where do we find the source? :)
-brian
On 9/7/2012 6:36 PM, Rob Jarratt wrote:
I am ready for a couple of people to try out the user mode
DECnet router I have been writing. Is anyone interested in trying
it
out?
You will need to be able to compile C code and have pcap or
winpcap installed.
Here is an extract from the README:
User Mode DECnet Router Readme
==============================
This program is a DECnet router that implements version 2.0 of
the DECnet routing specification found here:
http://linux-decnet.sourceforge.net/docs/route20.txt
Features
--------
1. Runs on Windows either as a Windows Service, or as a console
program.
2. Runs on Linux as a daemon.
3. Full routing capability, so it avoids broadcasting all
routing messages to
entire network and kills looping packets.
4. Supports Ethernet (using pcap/winpcap).
5. Supports Johnny's bridge.
6. Can be extended to support other kinds of circuit (Cisco and
Multinet might
be examples, not tried).
7. Does dynamic DNS updates without blocking.
Limitations
-----------
1. Only tested on Windows Server 2003 and Raspberry Pi running
Debian.
2. Does not support Phase III nodes.
3. Although it can be configured as a Level 1 node, Level 1 is
not
fully
supported. It has only been tested as a Level 2 (area router)
node.
4. Limited testing on Raspberry Pi.
5. Performance not tested.
6. Not tested with multiple ethernets.
7. Limited testing with multiple bridges.
Regards
Rob
--
http://www.wickensonline.co.ukhttp://declegacy.org.ukhttp://retrochallenge.nethttps://twitter.com/#!/%40urbancamo
The source code has been updated on CodePlex to fix both issues. It now
generates level 1 routing messages, so will work correctly if you have level
1 routers in your area. It also handles unreachable nodes in its own area
correctly now.
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Rob Jarratt
Sent: 08 September 2012 16:43
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For Testing
I have already realised that there is at least one deficiency. If you have
any
Level 1 routers in your area then it isn't going to work properly because
it
doesn't send out Level 1 Routing messages (but it does process the ones it
receives). I have also had a report that when nodes in my area are not
reachable, you get a timeout instead of an "unreachable" error.
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-
hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Rob Jarratt
Sent: 08 September 2012 14:12
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For
Testing
If you want to try routing directly to me, my config is
jarratt.dyndns.org:4711. I will need to know your details for the link
to
work.
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-
hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Brian Hechinger
Sent: 08 September 2012 12:35
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For
Testing
Excellent! I'll download and play when I have some free time!!
-brian
On Sep 8, 2012, at 4:04, "Rob Jarratt" <robert.jarratt at ntlworld.com>
wrote:
I have published everything up on CodePlex now. Here is the link:
https://route20.codeplex.com/
Regards
Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-
hecnet at Update.UU.SE]
On Behalf Of Brian Hechinger
Sent: 08 September 2012 00:38
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Beta User Mode DECnet Router Available For
Testing
Ok, but where do we find the source? :)
-brian
On 9/7/2012 6:36 PM, Rob Jarratt wrote:
I am ready for a couple of people to try out the user mode
DECnet router I have been writing. Is anyone interested in trying
it
out?
You will need to be able to compile C code and have pcap or
winpcap installed.
Here is an extract from the README:
User Mode DECnet Router Readme
==============================
This program is a DECnet router that implements version 2.0 of
the DECnet routing specification found here:
http://linux-decnet.sourceforge.net/docs/route20.txt
Features
--------
1. Runs on Windows either as a Windows Service, or as a console
program.
2. Runs on Linux as a daemon.
3. Full routing capability, so it avoids broadcasting all
routing messages to
entire network and kills looping packets.
4. Supports Ethernet (using pcap/winpcap).
5. Supports Johnny's bridge.
6. Can be extended to support other kinds of circuit (Cisco and
Multinet might
be examples, not tried).
7. Does dynamic DNS updates without blocking.
Limitations
-----------
1. Only tested on Windows Server 2003 and Raspberry Pi running
Debian.
2. Does not support Phase III nodes.
3. Although it can be configured as a Level 1 node, Level 1 is
not
fully
supported. It has only been tested as a Level 2 (area router)
node.
4. Limited testing on Raspberry Pi.
5. Performance not tested.
6. Not tested with multiple ethernets.
7. Limited testing with multiple bridges.
Regards
Rob