HI,
Does anyone have layered products for Ultrix 4.5 Vax, or layered
products for an older version + OS.
The last email I saw was 3 years ago offering the disks. Did anyone
make a copy ?
Thanks
Dan
My father asked me to document some stuff that his house network (bigish place, 400 sq m, patch panel, 48 port switch, 4 WLANs etc and a routed 3G connection to the outside).
Here's an excerpt:
-- Draytek won't reset, no LEDs come on etc. --
"Jim, it's dead"
Basically, the router has gone to meet God, as-salaamu alayhu wa rahmatu-Allah.
Buy a new router (model Vigor 2830).
Install it and follow the steps from "Nope, it's all still fucked"
On 2012-08-05 19:02, Mark Benson wrote:
The following nodes have changed name on Area 6 (not that anyone can see then right now ^_^)
6.51 DARMOK
6.54 JALAD
Updated on MIM.
Johnny
Neither have I. Only on openbsd and Solaris here. Should be easy though. I'll email you tomorrow.
-brian
On Aug 6, 2012, at 16:43, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
I'm game - never set it up on a Linux box before, though
On 6 Aug 2012, at 23:13, Brian Hechinger wrote:
A possible option would be to setup an OpenVPN tunnel somewhere to go through. Maybe not pretty, but it'll work.
If you want to try that email me off list and we can set it up on my colo box.
-brian
On Aug 6, 2012, at 16:00, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
On 6 Aug 2012, at 20:07, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Ah well, I could go on... Suffice to say that it's not because I'm opposed to the features that a TCP connection, or DNS resolution would give, but I prioritize something that I feel confident is working to features. And doing a proper solution with all these aspects is more work than I have cared to put into it. The bridge program is a hack.
As Paul mention, pthreads would probably be a good start if you want to do something more intelligent. You need to start thinking asynchronously.
My desire for this is basically because my ISP is NAT'd to hell - I have no way of getting UDP packets back to my network, as the ISP gives me a non-routable address.
Why go with this ISP? Well it's about 3x faster than the DSL I can get in the sticks over a 3G signal, with unlimited bandwidth and usage.
But sucks for HECnet..
Sampsa
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 08/06/2012 04:15 PM, Gregg Levine wrote:
Oh and the gang left Thursday last. They are around Dave's place.
No sign of 'em here..
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Hello!
Look for a blue van, and two red ones. Also a large strange vehicle
that answers to "Bedford". And a pair of lunch trucks.
Seriously Sampsa, did you relocate? And can you document the steps you
took to install Linux on that emulator?
Meanwhile I'm still trying out E11 ideas.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On 08/06/2012 04:15 PM, Gregg Levine wrote:
Oh and the gang left Thursday last. They are around Dave's place.
No sign of 'em here..
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 08/06/2012 03:26 AM, Mark Benson wrote:
The following nodes have changed name on Area 6 (not that anyone can see then right now ^_^)
6.51 DARMOK
6.54 JALAD
No Tinagra? ;)
That's the name of the cluster :)
Ahhh, nice!. :-)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
Mobile operator called Saunalahti, they're a virtual operator on top of one of the two major Finnish operators, Elisa.
Speeds are amazing, middle of the woods, I get 6/3 Mbps up down on a 3G dongle hooked to my Draytek router, and like 12/5 on my iPad.
13 euros a month, unlimited bandwidth and as much speed as your device can drive.
Oh and they've got a 4G base station in town, like 7 km away, should get like 40+ Mbps there.
Then again, Helsinki cable operators are now offering 300/20 Mbps as their to product :)
Sampsa
On 6 Aug 2012, at 23:15, Gregg Levine wrote:
Hello!
Sampsa all kidding aside who did you pick? I can think of several of
the names but probably not available where you are.
Oh and the gang left Thursday last. They are around Dave's place.
On Aug 6, 2012, at 4:00 PM, Sampsa Laine wrote:
On 6 Aug 2012, at 20:07, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Ah well, I could go on... Suffice to say that it's not because I'm opposed to the features that a TCP connection, or DNS resolution would give, but I prioritize something that I feel confident is working to features. And doing a proper solution with all these aspects is more work than I have cared to put into it. The bridge program is a hack.
As Paul mention, pthreads would probably be a good start if you want to do something more intelligent. You need to start thinking asynchronously.
My desire for this is basically because my ISP is NAT'd to hell - I have no way of getting UDP packets back to my network, as the ISP gives me a non-routable address.
Why go with this ISP? Well it's about 3x faster than the DSL I can get in the sticks over a 3G signal, with unlimited bandwidth and usage.
But sucks for HECnet..
Is there any protocol/port at all that you can get, inbound? Or are you limited to outbound connections only? For outbound, are there any significant limitations on what ports you can use?
Ethernet tunneling over TCP seems reasonable enough, even though the TCP connection/ack machinery is pure overhead for this application. SSL could be used if security is needed -- is that important?
For people who have port number limitations (censoring ISPs) I wonder if tunneling over HTTP should be defined. :-), sort of.
And for things like SSL... I should have thought of this earlier, but it occurs to me that a "user mode router" could nicely and easily be implemented in Python. Lots of bits of algorithm get very simple then; for example, turning on SSL support takes only a couple of lines once you have a non-SSL protocol implementation. And of course it runs on lots of operating systems without any change being required, even Windows. And yes, it supports threading (very easily).
paul
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
On 6 Aug 2012, at 20:07, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Ah well, I could go on... Suffice to say that it's not because I'm opposed to the features that a TCP connection, or DNS resolution would give, but I prioritize something that I feel confident is working to features. And doing a proper solution with all these aspects is more work than I have cared to put into it. The bridge program is a hack.
As Paul mention, pthreads would probably be a good start if you want to do something more intelligent. You need to start thinking asynchronously.
My desire for this is basically because my ISP is NAT'd to hell - I have no way of getting UDP packets back to my network, as the ISP gives me a non-routable address.
Why go with this ISP? Well it's about 3x faster than the DSL I can get in the sticks over a 3G signal, with unlimited bandwidth and usage.
But sucks for HECnet..
Sampsa
Hello!
Sampsa all kidding aside who did you pick? I can think of several of
the names but probably not available where you are.
Oh and the gang left Thursday last. They are around Dave's place.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
