On Jun 5, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Mark Benson wrote:
On 5 Jun 2012, at 15:50, <Paul_Koning at Dell.com> <Paul_Koning at Dell.com> wrote:
On Jun 5, 2012, at 5:29 AM, Mark Benson wrote:
...
I am looking at trying to mount an external hard drive or SSD to handle the disk images instead of the SD card. For some ^$%^$% reason you can't mount a disk as a user in Linux (I might be missing something, admittedly) like you can in RSX and VMS (again, more demonstration that UNIX sucks ;)) so I have to futz about as root to do that.
You can set that to be allowed with the "user" option, see "man fstab". It defaults to not allowed, which is the correct security answer. (I would assume the same is true in DEC operating systems that have protection mechanisms... it certainly is in RSTS.)
That means you have to enable it for each volume? That's a pain when you are dealing with dynamic volume devices and USB. In VMS this kind of stuff is decided on the USER account, not on the OS setup. I can see why people love VMS so much now...
I believe you can do it for USB across the board, but I'm not sure of the details.
paul
Having lost my Multinet tunnel to Steve's SG1 node a while back I have been trying sporadically to fix it with no luck. I decided hang it today and went back to using the bridge program (which works fine) so I am happy to say Area 6 is back on HECnet.
There are a few caveats however...
If Chrissie still wants machines on HECnet she need to move the off Area 6. I can no longer offer remote area routing for other people without significant extra work and testing. As I also cannot guarantee my uptime at the moment as I am on a very scrappy ADSL service I think it is for the best if the nodes outside my LAN are relocated. I am sorry for this inconvenience.
As indicated by my comment above, access to my network area will as ever be sporadic, depending on power-cuts, ADSL outages and also might be disturbed by some work on my main server, which houses STAR69 and my bridge.
--
Mark Benson
http://DECtec.info
Twitter: @DECtecInfo
HECnet: STAR69::MARK
Online Resource & Mailing List for DEC Enthusiasts.
On 5 Jun 2012, at 15:50, <Paul_Koning at Dell.com> <Paul_Koning at Dell.com> wrote:
On Jun 5, 2012, at 5:29 AM, Mark Benson wrote:
...
I am looking at trying to mount an external hard drive or SSD to handle the disk images instead of the SD card. For some ^$%^$% reason you can't mount a disk as a user in Linux (I might be missing something, admittedly) like you can in RSX and VMS (again, more demonstration that UNIX sucks ;)) so I have to futz about as root to do that.
You can set that to be allowed with the "user" option, see "man fstab". It defaults to not allowed, which is the correct security answer. (I would assume the same is true in DEC operating systems that have protection mechanisms... it certainly is in RSTS.)
That means you have to enable it for each volume? That's a pain when you are dealing with dynamic volume devices and USB. In VMS this kind of stuff is decided on the USER account, not on the OS setup. I can see why people love VMS so much now...
--
Mark Benson
http://DECtec.info
Twitter: @DECtecInfo
HECnet: STAR69::MARK
Online Resource & Mailing List for DEC Enthusiasts.
On Jun 5, 2012, at 5:29 AM, Mark Benson wrote:
...
I am looking at trying to mount an external hard drive or SSD to handle the disk images instead of the SD card. For some ^$%^$% reason you can't mount a disk as a user in Linux (I might be missing something, admittedly) like you can in RSX and VMS (again, more demonstration that UNIX sucks ;)) so I have to futz about as root to do that.
You can set that to be allowed with the "user" option, see "man fstab". It defaults to not allowed, which is the correct security answer. (I would assume the same is true in DEC operating systems that have protection mechanisms... it certainly is in RSTS.)
paul
...
The doc says that RT and Unix do it differently (no WAIT). I
haven't seen the Unix code but I did see the one for RT (F/B
version), and indeed, no WAIT instruction there. I'm not
sure why not. RT11 S/J seems to just be full of spin loops,
no central idle of any kind that I can see.
paul
Paul,
I think that depends on whether or not the idle loop pattern (for the
console light display) is being used. The lights pattern most certainly
makes use of the WAIT instruction. The SJ monitor is a completely
different beast than FB and friends - no question about it!
-Steve
I was referring to RT V2, which is what I have at hand. But it sounds like it's still the same in later versions (except for having sysgen options -- no sysgen in V2). The thing to remember is that there are multiple ways to tweak the lights, at least on later PDP11s -- WAIT displays R0 (if the Data display switch, if there is one, is set to "Data Paths"), while writing to 177570 sets the Display register (which can also be displayed by setting the switch to Display Register). But some older machines don't have a display register and don't have that switch. The 11/20, if I remember right, always displays R0 at a WAIT and ignores writes to 177570. I forgot what the 11/05 and 11/10 do on a WAIT (since they only have a single display, not a separate address and data display).
paul
Dave McGuire wrote:
... @sys$manager:netconfig
FWIW, that's what I'd do too...
NETCONFIG will start off by purging your existing database anyway, so if
you find yourself needing to do this again you can skip that step...
Bob
On 2012-06-05 11:29, Mark Benson wrote:
On 4 Jun 2012, at 23:15, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Nice.
Yeah, trouble is because I am using my current RasPi to work on VAX stuff I need a second one to run my PDP-11 sim on now :D C'mon Farnell get it together!!
Indeed. The more machines, the merrier... :-)
It would be interesting to hear of a comparison. The "newer" VAXen are really not that bad. But of course, everything is relative...
Like I say, it's not chronically 'slow' it just has a few pregnant pauses. Example: when I an using the TCP/IP configuration script in VMS 7.3 the pauses between menu screens are quite long. Stuff at the DCL terminal on the other hand is very quick (DIR's of long directory lists, etc.). There is always a smidge of additional lag because I am using SSH and the RasPi is having to encode the SSH packets on the fly as it goes. Telnet is much faster so I may switch over to using the DZ11 terminal emulation to work on it. Only problem is that's not the Operator terminal on SimH so I can't do everything through it.
Ok.
Talk about doing a misread. I saw that as an RSX-11 MultiProcessor system. :-)
:D That'd be nice... but tricky ;)
simh don't have the code (yet). e11 do, however...
I would suspect that is because the CPU will still be just waiting for I/O lots of the time. Compilations, as well as running something like SYSGEN in RSX, is really I/O intensive. Not much CPU work in there.
I can tell when the computer is working on the SD card, the LED flashes, and some times it's still loading SD card data (disk images) and sometimes it's thinking really hard :) SYSGENs are snappy except for the time consuming parts (the actually assembly compiles for the Executive, Drivers, etc). The RAM is either DDR or DDR2 so there shouldn't be a speed issue there, the biggest bottleneck is really the SD card.
Even compilation in RSX is a lot of I/O. You can improve things if you do some magic, but reading sources is just a small part of a compilation. It's a lot of work files, and it's a lot of output. And lots of overlays in the compilers...
I am looking at trying to mount an external hard drive or SSD to handle the disk images instead of the SD card. For some ^$%^$% reason you can't mount a disk as a user in Linux (I might be missing something, admittedly) like you can in RSX and VMS (again, more demonstration that UNIX sucks ;)) so I have to futz about as root to do that.
Yes. Mounting in Unix-land have some potentially interesting implications which makes it "unsafe" to allow normal users to do it.
Johnny
On 4 Jun 2012, at 23:15, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Nice.
Yeah, trouble is because I am using my current RasPi to work on VAX stuff I need a second one to run my PDP-11 sim on now :D C'mon Farnell get it together!!
It would be interesting to hear of a comparison. The "newer" VAXen are really not that bad. But of course, everything is relative...
Like I say, it's not chronically 'slow' it just has a few pregnant pauses. Example: when I an using the TCP/IP configuration script in VMS 7.3 the pauses between menu screens are quite long. Stuff at the DCL terminal on the other hand is very quick (DIR's of long directory lists, etc.). There is always a smidge of additional lag because I am using SSH and the RasPi is having to encode the SSH packets on the fly as it goes. Telnet is much faster so I may switch over to using the DZ11 terminal emulation to work on it. Only problem is that's not the Operator terminal on SimH so I can't do everything through it.
Talk about doing a misread. I saw that as an RSX-11 MultiProcessor system. :-)
:D That'd be nice... but tricky ;)
I would suspect that is because the CPU will still be just waiting for I/O lots of the time. Compilations, as well as running something like SYSGEN in RSX, is really I/O intensive. Not much CPU work in there.
I can tell when the computer is working on the SD card, the LED flashes, and some times it's still loading SD card data (disk images) and sometimes it's thinking really hard :) SYSGENs are snappy except for the time consuming parts (the actually assembly compiles for the Executive, Drivers, etc). The RAM is either DDR or DDR2 so there shouldn't be a speed issue there, the biggest bottleneck is really the SD card.
I am looking at trying to mount an external hard drive or SSD to handle the disk images instead of the SD card. For some ^$%^$% reason you can't mount a disk as a user in Linux (I might be missing something, admittedly) like you can in RSX and VMS (again, more demonstration that UNIX sucks ;)) so I have to futz about as root to do that.
At $35 it was bound to have limitations and for the most part they are livable-with.
--
Mark Benson
http://DECtec.info
Twitter: @DECtecInfo
HECnet: STAR69::MARK
Online Resource & Mailing List for DEC Enthusiasts.
RT-11 is "famous" for self-modifying code. That fact makes it so much
fun to debug when you have a real-time bug. Been there... Done that...
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
[mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Johnny Billquist
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 22:52
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] Speaking of IDLE
On 2012-06-05 04:44, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2012-06-05 03:24, Steve Davidson wrote:
Paul,
I think that depends on whether or not the idle loop
pattern (for the
console light display) is being used. The lights pattern most
certainly makes use of the WAIT instruction. The SJ monitor is a
completely different beast than FB and friends - no
question about it!
Well, there are more ways to spin a cat... Or spin the
lights in this
case. WAIT is one way to show something on the front panel. Loading
the display register is another.
RT-11 is in fact using the Switch Register at 177570 to
display things
on the front panel.
Look at RMONFB.MAC, around line 4800, to see the code.
(Every time I read the RT-11 sources, I feel a little dirty... No
offense meant for the RT-11 fans around here or anywhere.)
It's all conditionalized on LIGH$T, and there is not even
the option
if you are running the SJ monitor...
Aw, heck. I might as well post the code, since isn't that long...
====
3$:
.IF NE LIGH$T
.ROM DEC LITECT,VALUE=1
BNE 8$
ADD #512.,LITECT
4$: ROL 7$
BNE 5$
COM 7$
5$: BCC 6$
ADD #100,4$
BIC #200,4$
6$: BIT #LIGHT$,CONFG2
BEQ 8$
MOV (PC)+,@(PC)+
7$: .WORD 0,SR
.ENDC
8$:
..NULJ::
====
(And yes, SR is defined as 177570)
(And maybe you understand why I feel dirty when reading RT-11
after this fine example of code... It's cut-and-pasted right
from the source, it really looks just like this.)
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 12:17:23AM +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:
FYI - Update now have a Cisco box, which will be setup within a few
days to be able to route DECnet over IP, so that will become another
options to hook into HECnet at the Update site.
Sorry that I haven't gotten arround to it sooner. Update is preparing an
exhibiton at the University Museum. Lots of work with that :)
I can't promise getting the Cisco installed this week, but I'll see what
I can do.
I can however recommend anyone being close to uppsala this summer to
take a tour past Gustavianum to look at some nice DEC (and other)
hardware. Here is a hilight of the objects:
DECSYSTEM-2060
PDP-12
PDP-11/70
PDP-8
CRAY YMP EL
DG NOVA 3
peripherals!
Cheers,
Pontus.
