On 10 Jun 2012, at 09:37, Mark Benson wrote:
I don't know of any for OS X either, it's not exactly and OS that exudes support for legacy systems.
BUT IT'S SO SHINY!
On 10 Jun 2012, at 07:59, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 06/08/2012 11:08 AM, Gregg Levine wrote:
At one point in time, the OS for the Mac did speak natively to the DEC
family of hardware. It would be very interesting to find out how they
did it. This would greatly benefit Sampsa at least.
Yes, but *which one*? The "original" MacOS bears no resemblance to,
and shares no code with, the current UNIX-based OS. I know of no
MacOS-X-based DECnet implementations. (sadly)
I think we established it was Classic Mac OS and was likely using TSSnet or PWMac :)
I don't know of any for OS X either, it's not exactly and OS that exudes support for legacy systems.
--
Mark Benson
http://DECtec.info
Twitter: @DECtecInfo
HECnet: STAR69::MARK
Online Resource & Mailing List for DEC Enthusiasts.
Bob, on A44RTR is see SG1 flapping as well. After breakfast I'll see whether there is a pattern. Initially I thought it was the linux laptop going to sleep after a whule. That may not be the case.
Hans
------Origineel bericht------
Van: Bob Armstrong
Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: RE: [HECnet] netowrk flapping....
Verzonden: 10 juni 2012 01:32
Yup, that's basically a deficiency I've got...
Yeah, but the next question is "Are you the only one", or do other
people's routers have similar timeout issues?
Bob
On 06/08/2012 10:17 AM, Bill Pechter wrote:
My wife refers to the 11/7xx boxes I worked on as my old girlfriends.
;)
If one more piece of hardware
hits the house I'll need the same lawyer.
I'd sure miss Wifey...for a little while. ;)
As soon as I can find it a
good home I'm getting rid of my Vaxstation and going
to go to only emulated hardware under VMware Workstation/ESXi/XenServer at home.
Let me know if you need an extra pair of hands with VMware ESXi; I run
a big host machine here and several more for clients.
And...What model of VAXstation? I'd very happily give another VAX (or
two, three..) a home.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 06/08/2012 11:08 AM, Gregg Levine wrote:
At one point in time, the OS for the Mac did speak natively to the DEC
family of hardware. It would be very interesting to find out how they
did it. This would greatly benefit Sampsa at least.
Yes, but *which one*? The "original" MacOS bears no resemblance to,
and shares no code with, the current UNIX-based OS. I know of no
MacOS-X-based DECnet implementations. (sadly)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
This end is a FVS318...
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
[mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Bob Armstrong
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2012 18:45
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: RE: [HECnet] netowrk flapping....
and Bob A has a home gw (forgot what it
was) that he claims do the right thing, (not decnet routing..)
Well, I have a Netgear FVS338. It's a "SOHO" box -
somewhere between a
turnkey home router and a fancy Cisco box. I never thought
of it as all
that great, but it does allow me to set up static routes. In
particular I can map specific external ports/Internet IPs to
internal ports/IPs independent of the NAT.
Bob
Any chance this device can be replaced with something IP compatible?
(What's the uplink interface?)
I don't know of a device that I could easily replace it with that is still supported, has VLAN support with multiple virtual interfaces, and without being too prohibitive for a home router.
The uplink port is a gigabit port connected to my FiOS ONT (connected at 100 Mbps).
--Marc
With my connection, I noticed that the circuit would disconnect and
reconnect periodically. It corresponded to the timeout in my firewall
causing the UDP association to be lost. When I increased the timeout
in my firewall for these port 700 UDP "connections", that made my
circuit much more stable.
Like Peter said, Peter and I had a big debate about this at lunch today.
UDP is, by definition (or so I thought), both stateless and connectionless.
I can't understand what state or connection is being timed out in this
case....
Yes, a UDP session is connectionless, however when a firewall is doing
NAT and/or PAT (remember I mentioned that my firewall is randomizing the
source port number, so the LAN port numbers are different from the ones
sent over the internet), it needs to maintain a session table to keep
track of which IP addresses and port numbers map to which systems and
port numbers locally. Those connections time out after a while, and then
subsequent UDP packets wouldn't be recognized.
Any chance this device can be replaced with something IP compatible?
(What's the uplink interface?)
--P
Yup, that's basically a deficiency I've got...
Yeah, but the next question is "Are you the only one", or do other
people's routers have similar timeout issues?
Bob
Ok, I looked thru 36 hours of OPERATOR.LOG on LEGATO for listener receive timeout adjacency down/adjacency up ( flapping as Peter calls it). Here s what I found
The Multinet connection to SG1 flaps all the time, almost like clockwork, with a period of about 20 minutes.
The Multinet connection to GORVAX flapped once in that same 36 hour period.
The Multinet connection to STUPI never flapped, although it did suffer from one corrupted packet error.
The Multinet connections to CIERE and FRUGAL never, ever, flapped nor suffered any corrupted packets.
So, what s it mean?? Bob