On 2012-10-31 21:28, Dave McGuire wrote:
On 10/31/2012 04:21 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Also do we send any encrypted stuff over this? What if something
commercial gets routed through say CHIMPYMAIL.COM - will this be
a problem or is it a "problem" in theory only?
I thought encryption and commercial messages were strictly
verboten on HAM stuff.
They are. So let's not encrypt stuff. And how much commercial
data flows across HECnet? ;)
So, now that selling DECnet-based internet access to rural areas over
packet radio is out, how about we setup some HECnet nodes in
Antarctica?
We could probably do that! Is Ethan Dicks among us? If not, he
should be. He works down there. I've CCd him on this.
Surprised me, but he is actually not subscribed. I thought he was...
Hi, Ethan... :-)
As long as I'm at it, I might also mention that at least one person is subscribed to this list with an address on HECnet. Well done. :-)
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On 2012-10-31 19:48, RCS/RI info wrote:
How do I set my subscription to this list to digest mode? I tried the standard majordomo commands without success.
Good question. I'm not sure if the (old version of) majordomo we're running have that function.
Try just sending "help" to majordomo, and see what it supports...
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On 2012-10-31 18:58, Paul_Koning at Dell.com wrote:
On Oct 30, 2012, at 1:06 AM, John Wilson wrote:
From: Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com>
I had a PDT-11/150 many years ago, mid-80s. It was kinda fun, but
also kinda pointless. The only thing you can run on it is RT-11.
I had one too back then and had a blast! RT-11 is terrific (infinitely
better than contemporary microcomputer OSes), and anyway a 150 will run
pretty much anything an 11/03 will run (but with 30 KW of memory instead of
just 28) so it's really pretty flexible. I wrote a FORTH-79 system on mine ...
FWIW, for those who like Forth, there's a Forth implementation available as a run-time system on RSTS/E. It's part of the unsupported stuff on V10.1 (and possibly somewhat earlier, maybe as early as V9.0, I forgot). I did the port; I used it among other things for implementing an interactive crash dump analyzer *very* loosely modeled on VMS "SDA".
Speaking of Forth, there is also FiG-Forth. It runs under RSX, RT-11 and standalone. I would assume it should work fine under RSTS/E as well, based on that, but I don't know for sure.
Can be found on MIM::DU:[FORTH]
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Cory Smelosky <b4 at gewt.net> wrote:
I keep forgetting to send an email about this:
Can I get:
33.300 (GEWT)
33.301 (GEWT1)
33.302 (MISSY)
33.303 (MINDY)
33.305 (MNCSTR)
added to the master node database please?
(yeah, I know I skipped 33.304)
Thanks!
(unrelated: but I see there's a DARMOK and JALAD in the nodelist, are they by chance virtual machines running on a host named TANAGRA? ;) )
Hello!
Probably.
But if I get the strings worked out regarding my plans, I might have a
host named Enterprise running.
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
I keep forgetting to send an email about this:
Can I get:
33.300 (GEWT)
33.301 (GEWT1)
33.302 (MISSY)
33.303 (MINDY)
33.305 (MNCSTR)
added to the master node database please?
(yeah, I know I skipped 33.304)
Thanks!
(unrelated: but I see there's a DARMOK and JALAD in the nodelist, are they by chance virtual machines running on a host named TANAGRA? ;) )
Hey Dave,
When you installed RSTS/E and configured DECnet, what options did you give? I want to see what I did wrong. Did you do anything after installing the layered product that was special or did you configure it in the little installer thingy?
On 10/31/2012 04:21 PM, Cory Smelosky wrote:
Also do we send any encrypted stuff over this? What if something
commercial gets routed through say CHIMPYMAIL.COM - will this be
a problem or is it a "problem" in theory only?
I thought encryption and commercial messages were strictly
verboten on HAM stuff.
They are. So let's not encrypt stuff. And how much commercial
data flows across HECnet? ;)
So, now that selling DECnet-based internet access to rural areas over
packet radio is out, how about we setup some HECnet nodes in
Antarctica?
We could probably do that! Is Ethan Dicks among us? If not, he
should be. He works down there. I've CCd him on this.
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 10/31/2012 02:16 AM, Gregg Levine wrote:
SBC 11/21 (boardname KXT11) Falcon and Falcon Plus single board
computer on a Qbus card implementing the basic PDP-11 instruction set,
based on T11 chipset containing 32 KB static RAM, two ROM sockets,
three serial lines, 20 bit parallel I/O, three interval timers and a
two-channel DMA controller. Up to 14 Falcons could be placed into one
Qbus system.
KXJ11 QBUS card (M7616) with PDP-11 based peripheral processor and
DMA controller. Based on a J11 CPU equipped with 512 kB RAM, 64 kB ROM
and parallel and serial interfaces.
KXT11s are very fun boards. I have one, I like it a lot.
I don't have any KXJ11 though. They are as rare as hens' teeth,
though I do see one on eBay right now for a not-too-terrible price. I
just looked at the auction; it says "10+ available"!!!
I'll bet he'd accept a lower-than-normal offer if it were for a
quantity of them. Bulk purchase?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 31 Oct 2012, at 16:09, Dave McGuire <mcguire at neurotica.com> wrote:
On 10/31/2012 03:34 PM, Sampsa Laine wrote:
Also do we send any encrypted stuff over this? What if something
commercial gets routed through say CHIMPYMAIL.COM - will this be a
problem or is it a "problem" in theory only?
I thought encryption and commercial messages were strictly verboten
on HAM stuff.
They are. So let's not encrypt stuff. And how much commercial data
flows across HECnet? ;)
So, now that selling DECnet-based internet access to rural areas over packet radio is out, how about we setup some HECnet nodes in Antarctica?
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
On 10/31/2012 03:09 PM, Sampsa Laine wrote:
Let's hijack one - I thought the Iranians managed to get one up there, don't think anyone would particularly give us trouble in the West if we took it over..
We could do that. I have some satcomm gear here.
(assuming one of our governments hasn't already grabbed that satellite..)
-Dave
--
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA
