On 16/09/11 11:22, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
Did you adjust EXPECTED_VOTES on the alpha server?
From: Mark Wickens <mark at wickensonline.co.uk>
Sender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:09:04 +0100
To: <hecnet at Update.UU.SE>
ReplyTo: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Fwd: Re: [HECnet] More clustering fun
Just to add to the picture - if I reduce VOTES on the satellite to 0 I get this happening:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject:
Re: [HECnet] More clustering fun
Date:
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:33:47 +0000
From:
hvlems at zonnet.nl
Reply-To:
hvlems at zonnet.nl
To:
Mark Wickens <mark at wickensonline.co.uk>
All I can think of is this:
1) Both slave and aleph both use the same VMSCLUSTER license
2) The cluster id and cluster password are different on both nodes.
On an alpha you can modify this in sysman (use help in sysman to find the correct command). On a Vax the command is burried in sysgen.
Hans
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Wickens <mark at wickensonline.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:11:41
Cc: <hvlems at zonnet.nl>
Subject: Re: [HECnet] More clustering fun
Hi Hans,
I didn't want to pre-empt what I thought happened last time as I wasn't
sure I'd got it right, but it has happened again so it's definitely an
issue.
I've updated the VOTES in ALEPH (the satellite) MODPARAMS.DAT, ran
AUTOGEN and rebooted the cluster.
Now when ALEPH attempts to join the cluster I get these messages repeatedly:
%CNXMAN, sending VAXcluster membership request to system SLAVE
%CNXMAN, sending VAXcluster membership request to system SLAVE
%CNXMAN, sending VAXcluster membership request to system SLAVE
%CNXMAN, sending VAXcluster membership request to system SLAVE
%CNXMAN, sending VAXcluster membership request to system SLAVE
and I see this on SLAVE:
$$
%CNXMAN, Received VMScluster membership request from system ALEPH
%CNXMAN, Proposing addition of system ALEPH
%CNXMAN, Completing VMScluster state transition
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:35.79 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:35.79 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) received VMScluster membership
request from node ALEPH
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:35.79 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:35.79 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) proposed addition of node ALEPH
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:35.79 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:35.79 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) completed VMScluster state transition
$$
%CNXMAN, Received VMScluster membership request from system ALEPH
%CNXMAN, Proposing addition of system ALEPH
%CNXMAN, Completing VMScluster state transition
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:39.04 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:39.04 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) received VMScluster membership
request from node ALEPH
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:39.04 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:39.04 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) proposed addition of node ALEPH
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:39.04 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:39.04 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) completed VMScluster state transition
$$
%CNXMAN, Received VMScluster membership request from system ALEPH
%CNXMAN, Proposing addition of system ALEPH
%CNXMAN, Completing VMScluster state transition
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:43.02 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:43.02 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) received VMScluster membership
request from node ALEPH
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:43.02 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:43.02 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) proposed addition of node ALEPH
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:43.02 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:43.02 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) completed VMScluster state transition
This just repeats forever.
Some more information from SLAVE (the ALPHA server):
SHOW CLUSTER:
View of Cluster from system ID 4345 node:
SLAVE
16-SEP-2011 10:06:13
+--------------------------------------------------------+---------+
| SYSTEMS | MEMBERS |
+--------+--------------------------------+--------------+---------+
| NODE | HW_TYPE | SOFTWARE | STATUS |
+--------+--------------------------------+--------------+---------+
| SLAVE | AlphaServer 1000A 5/300 | VMS V8.3 | MEMBER |
| ALEPH | VAXstation 4000-VLC | VMS V7.3 | NEW |
+--------+--------------------------------+--------------+---------+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
CLUSTER |
+--------+-----------+----------+------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| CL_EXP | CL_QUORUM | CL_VOTES | CL_MEMBERS | FORMED |
LAST_TRANSITION |
+--------+-----------+----------+------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 16-SEP-2011 09:56 |
16-SEP-2011 09:56 |
+--------+-----------+----------+------------+-------------------+-------------------+
SYSGEN> SHOW EXPECTED_VOTES
%CNXMAN, Completing VMScluster state transition
Parameter Name Current Default Min. Max. Unit
Dynamic
-------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ----
-------
EXPECTED_VOTES 1 1 1 127 Votes
Any ideas why this is going wrong?
Thanks for the help, much appreciated,
Mark.
On 16/09/11 09:40, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
> Regarding the alphaserver: check the value of expectedvotes in sysgen.
> In a cluster with non-voting satellites only, its value must be less than Votes+1
> Hans
> ------Origineel bericht------
> Van: Mark Wickens
> Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
> Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
> Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
> Onderwerp: [HECnet] More clustering fun
> Verzonden: 16 september 2011 10:14
>
> I've now refreshed the VAX satellites system drive and installed it in the
> ALPHA server. The one problem I have remaining is that the VOTES the
> satellite is contributing to the cluster is 1. I believe for a proper
> satellite this should be 0.
>
> Is this a case of updating the MODPARAMS.DAT on the satellite and autogen
> and reboot? Do I need to do anything with the ALPHA servers configuration?
>
> Presumably I will need to reboot the ALPHA server as well.
>
> Thanks for the help,
>
> Kind regards, Mark.
>
The EXPECTED_VOTES on the ALPHA is set to 1 - which I assume is the value we would anticipate would work?
Even when both the server and the satellite have VOTES set to 1 the expected votes remains at 1 on the server, although if you examine the cluster via SHOW CLUSTER it shows that the quorum is set to 2:
View of Cluster from system ID 4345 node: SLAVE 16-SEP-2011 11:21:15
+--------------------------------------------------------+---------+
| SYSTEMS | MEMBERS |
+--------+--------------------------------+--------------+---------+
| NODE | HW_TYPE | SOFTWARE | STATUS |
+--------+--------------------------------+--------------+---------+
| SLAVE | AlphaServer 1000A 5/300 | VMS V8.3 | MEMBER |
| ALEPH | VAXstation 4000-VLC | VMS V7.3 | MEMBER |
+--------+--------------------------------+--------------+---------+
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| CLUSTER
+--------+-----------+----------+------------+-------------------+--------------
| CL_EXP | CL_QUORUM | CL_VOTES | CL_MEMBERS | FORMED | LAST_TRANSIT
+--------+-----------+----------+------------+-------------------+--------------
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 16-SEP-2011 11:04 | 16-SEP-2011 1
+--------+-----------+----------+------------+-------------------+--------------
With the satellites VOTES set to 0 (which causes the endless %CNXMAN messages) if I turn off the satellite at that point I get the following:
$$
%CNXMAN, Quorum lost, blocking activity
$$
%CNXMAN, Timed-out lost connection to system ALEPH
%CNXMAN, Proposing reconfiguration of the VMScluster
%CNXMAN, Discovered system ALEPH
%CNXMAN, Removed from VMScluster system ALEPH
%CNXMAN, Completing VMScluster state transition
%CNXMAN, Established connection to system ALEPH
and the server hangs. I end up having to reboot the server, because the satellite never joins the cluster successfully.
It's all fun!
Regards, Mark.
Did you adjust EXPECTED_VOTES on the alpha server?
From: Mark Wickens <mark at wickensonline.co.uk>
Sender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:09:04 +0100
To: <hecnet at Update.UU.SE>
ReplyTo: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Fwd: Re: [HECnet] More clustering fun
Just to add to the picture - if I reduce VOTES on the satellite to 0 I get this happening:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject:
Re: [HECnet] More clustering fun
Date:
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:33:47 +0000
From:
hvlems at zonnet.nl
Reply-To:
hvlems at zonnet.nl
To:
Mark Wickens <mark at wickensonline.co.uk>
All I can think of is this:
1) Both slave and aleph both use the same VMSCLUSTER license
2) The cluster id and cluster password are different on both nodes.
On an alpha you can modify this in sysman (use help in sysman to find the correct command). On a Vax the command is burried in sysgen.
Hans
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Wickens <mark at wickensonline.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:11:41
Cc: <hvlems at zonnet.nl>
Subject: Re: [HECnet] More clustering fun
Hi Hans,
I didn't want to pre-empt what I thought happened last time as I wasn't
sure I'd got it right, but it has happened again so it's definitely an
issue.
I've updated the VOTES in ALEPH (the satellite) MODPARAMS.DAT, ran
AUTOGEN and rebooted the cluster.
Now when ALEPH attempts to join the cluster I get these messages repeatedly:
%CNXMAN, sending VAXcluster membership request to system SLAVE
%CNXMAN, sending VAXcluster membership request to system SLAVE
%CNXMAN, sending VAXcluster membership request to system SLAVE
%CNXMAN, sending VAXcluster membership request to system SLAVE
%CNXMAN, sending VAXcluster membership request to system SLAVE
and I see this on SLAVE:
$$
%CNXMAN, Received VMScluster membership request from system ALEPH
%CNXMAN, Proposing addition of system ALEPH
%CNXMAN, Completing VMScluster state transition
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:35.79 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:35.79 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) received VMScluster membership
request from node ALEPH
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:35.79 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:35.79 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) proposed addition of node ALEPH
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:35.79 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:35.79 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) completed VMScluster state transition
$$
%CNXMAN, Received VMScluster membership request from system ALEPH
%CNXMAN, Proposing addition of system ALEPH
%CNXMAN, Completing VMScluster state transition
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:39.04 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:39.04 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) received VMScluster membership
request from node ALEPH
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:39.04 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:39.04 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) proposed addition of node ALEPH
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:39.04 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:39.04 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) completed VMScluster state transition
$$
%CNXMAN, Received VMScluster membership request from system ALEPH
%CNXMAN, Proposing addition of system ALEPH
%CNXMAN, Completing VMScluster state transition
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:43.02 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:43.02 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) received VMScluster membership
request from node ALEPH
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:43.02 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:43.02 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) proposed addition of node ALEPH
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:43.02 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:43.02 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) completed VMScluster state transition
This just repeats forever.
Some more information from SLAVE (the ALPHA server):
SHOW CLUSTER:
View of Cluster from system ID 4345 node:
SLAVE
16-SEP-2011 10:06:13
+--------------------------------------------------------+---------+
| SYSTEMS | MEMBERS |
+--------+--------------------------------+--------------+---------+
| NODE | HW_TYPE | SOFTWARE | STATUS |
+--------+--------------------------------+--------------+---------+
| SLAVE | AlphaServer 1000A 5/300 | VMS V8.3 | MEMBER |
| ALEPH | VAXstation 4000-VLC | VMS V7.3 | NEW |
+--------+--------------------------------+--------------+---------+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
CLUSTER |
+--------+-----------+----------+------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| CL_EXP | CL_QUORUM | CL_VOTES | CL_MEMBERS | FORMED |
LAST_TRANSITION |
+--------+-----------+----------+------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 16-SEP-2011 09:56 |
16-SEP-2011 09:56 |
+--------+-----------+----------+------------+-------------------+-------------------+
SYSGEN> SHOW EXPECTED_VOTES
%CNXMAN, Completing VMScluster state transition
Parameter Name Current Default Min. Max. Unit
Dynamic
-------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ----
-------
EXPECTED_VOTES 1 1 1 127 Votes
Any ideas why this is going wrong?
Thanks for the help, much appreciated,
Mark.
On 16/09/11 09:40, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
> Regarding the alphaserver: check the value of expectedvotes in sysgen.
> In a cluster with non-voting satellites only, its value must be less than Votes+1
> Hans
> ------Origineel bericht------
> Van: Mark Wickens
> Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
> Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
> Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
> Onderwerp: [HECnet] More clustering fun
> Verzonden: 16 september 2011 10:14
>
> I've now refreshed the VAX satellites system drive and installed it in the
> ALPHA server. The one problem I have remaining is that the VOTES the
> satellite is contributing to the cluster is 1. I believe for a proper
> satellite this should be 0.
>
> Is this a case of updating the MODPARAMS.DAT on the satellite and autogen
> and reboot? Do I need to do anything with the ALPHA servers configuration?
>
> Presumably I will need to reboot the ALPHA server as well.
>
> Thanks for the help,
>
> Kind regards, Mark.
>
Just to add to the picture - if I reduce VOTES on the satellite to 0 I get this happening:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject:
Re: [HECnet] More clustering fun
Date:
Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:33:47 +0000
From:
hvlems at zonnet.nl
Reply-To:
hvlems at zonnet.nl
To:
Mark Wickens <mark at wickensonline.co.uk>
All I can think of is this:
1) Both slave and aleph both use the same VMSCLUSTER license
2) The cluster id and cluster password are different on both nodes.
On an alpha you can modify this in sysman (use help in sysman to find the correct command). On a Vax the command is burried in sysgen.
Hans
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Wickens <mark at wickensonline.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:11:41
Cc: <hvlems at zonnet.nl>
Subject: Re: [HECnet] More clustering fun
Hi Hans,
I didn't want to pre-empt what I thought happened last time as I wasn't
sure I'd got it right, but it has happened again so it's definitely an
issue.
I've updated the VOTES in ALEPH (the satellite) MODPARAMS.DAT, ran
AUTOGEN and rebooted the cluster.
Now when ALEPH attempts to join the cluster I get these messages repeatedly:
%CNXMAN, sending VAXcluster membership request to system SLAVE
%CNXMAN, sending VAXcluster membership request to system SLAVE
%CNXMAN, sending VAXcluster membership request to system SLAVE
%CNXMAN, sending VAXcluster membership request to system SLAVE
%CNXMAN, sending VAXcluster membership request to system SLAVE
and I see this on SLAVE:
$$
%CNXMAN, Received VMScluster membership request from system ALEPH
%CNXMAN, Proposing addition of system ALEPH
%CNXMAN, Completing VMScluster state transition
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:35.79 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:35.79 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) received VMScluster membership
request from node ALEPH
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:35.79 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:35.79 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) proposed addition of node ALEPH
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:35.79 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:35.79 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) completed VMScluster state transition
$$
%CNXMAN, Received VMScluster membership request from system ALEPH
%CNXMAN, Proposing addition of system ALEPH
%CNXMAN, Completing VMScluster state transition
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:39.04 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:39.04 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) received VMScluster membership
request from node ALEPH
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:39.04 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:39.04 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) proposed addition of node ALEPH
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:39.04 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:39.04 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) completed VMScluster state transition
$$
%CNXMAN, Received VMScluster membership request from system ALEPH
%CNXMAN, Proposing addition of system ALEPH
%CNXMAN, Completing VMScluster state transition
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:43.02 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:43.02 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) received VMScluster membership
request from node ALEPH
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:43.02 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:43.02 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) proposed addition of node ALEPH
%%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM 16-SEP-2011 10:05:43.02 %%%%%%%%%%%
10:05:43.02 Node SLAVE (csid 00010001) completed VMScluster state transition
This just repeats forever.
Some more information from SLAVE (the ALPHA server):
SHOW CLUSTER:
View of Cluster from system ID 4345 node:
SLAVE
16-SEP-2011 10:06:13
+--------------------------------------------------------+---------+
| SYSTEMS | MEMBERS |
+--------+--------------------------------+--------------+---------+
| NODE | HW_TYPE | SOFTWARE | STATUS |
+--------+--------------------------------+--------------+---------+
| SLAVE | AlphaServer 1000A 5/300 | VMS V8.3 | MEMBER |
| ALEPH | VAXstation 4000-VLC | VMS V7.3 | NEW |
+--------+--------------------------------+--------------+---------+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|
CLUSTER |
+--------+-----------+----------+------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| CL_EXP | CL_QUORUM | CL_VOTES | CL_MEMBERS | FORMED |
LAST_TRANSITION |
+--------+-----------+----------+------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 16-SEP-2011 09:56 |
16-SEP-2011 09:56 |
+--------+-----------+----------+------------+-------------------+-------------------+
SYSGEN> SHOW EXPECTED_VOTES
%CNXMAN, Completing VMScluster state transition
Parameter Name Current Default Min. Max. Unit
Dynamic
-------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ----
-------
EXPECTED_VOTES 1 1 1 127 Votes
Any ideas why this is going wrong?
Thanks for the help, much appreciated,
Mark.
On 16/09/11 09:40, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
> Regarding the alphaserver: check the value of expectedvotes in sysgen.
> In a cluster with non-voting satellites only, its value must be less than Votes+1
> Hans
> ------Origineel bericht------
> Van: Mark Wickens
> Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
> Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
> Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
> Onderwerp: [HECnet] More clustering fun
> Verzonden: 16 september 2011 10:14
>
> I've now refreshed the VAX satellites system drive and installed it in the
> ALPHA server. The one problem I have remaining is that the VOTES the
> satellite is contributing to the cluster is 1. I believe for a proper
> satellite this should be 0.
>
> Is this a case of updating the MODPARAMS.DAT on the satellite and autogen
> and reboot? Do I need to do anything with the ALPHA servers configuration?
>
> Presumably I will need to reboot the ALPHA server as well.
>
> Thanks for the help,
>
> Kind regards, Mark.
>
I've now refreshed the VAX satellites system drive and installed it in the
ALPHA server. The one problem I have remaining is that the VOTES the
satellite is contributing to the cluster is 1. I believe for a proper
satellite this should be 0.
The number of votes a node has determines what happens to it when it
loses contact with other members of the cluster. If each node in a two
node cluster has one vote, then the cluster quorum is two votes. If
something happens to either node, the other notices that quorum has been
lost and will hang until quorum is reestablished. The reason for the hang
is that all each node knows is that it can't see the other node. It doesn't
know whether the other has shut down or is still running and might become
visible again shortly, in which case, everything can resume.
If your diskless satellite should die unexpectedly, it is somewhat
irritating if it also ends up hanging the other node, for no good reason.
If the satellite has lost contact with the node with the disks, then it can
do nothing anyway. Hence the reason for recommending zero votes for diskless
satellites. No other ill effects will result from leaving votes set to one.
Whatever the number of votes each node has, when shutting down a voting
member of the cluster, REMOVE_NODE should be specified in order to avoid
hanging the rest of the cluster after the shutdown completes. This specifies
that the remaining cluster nodes should recompute quorum taking into account
the loss of the node being shut down.
Regards.
Peter Coghlan.
Regarding the alphaserver: check the value of expectedvotes in sysgen.
In a cluster with non-voting satellites only, its value must be less than Votes+1
Hans
------Origineel bericht------
Van: Mark Wickens
Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: [HECnet] More clustering fun
Verzonden: 16 september 2011 10:14
I've now refreshed the VAX satellites system drive and installed it in the
ALPHA server. The one problem I have remaining is that the VOTES the
satellite is contributing to the cluster is 1. I believe for a proper
satellite this should be 0.
Is this a case of updating the MODPARAMS.DAT on the satellite and autogen
and reboot? Do I need to do anything with the ALPHA servers configuration?
Presumably I will need to reboot the ALPHA server as well.
Thanks for the help,
Kind regards, Mark.
Correct. VOTES is not dynamic so you have two options:
1) Modify modparams.dat and run autogen with the reboot option
2) Modify modparams.dat
Run sysgen to modify VOTES and write current
Reboot
There is a lazy third option: same as 2) but skip modifying modparams.dat. Which is sloppy work, to put it mildly.
------Origineel bericht------
Van: Mark Wickens
Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: [HECnet] More clustering fun
Verzonden: 16 september 2011 10:14
I've now refreshed the VAX satellites system drive and installed it in the
ALPHA server. The one problem I have remaining is that the VOTES the
satellite is contributing to the cluster is 1. I believe for a proper
satellite this should be 0.
Is this a case of updating the MODPARAMS.DAT on the satellite and autogen
and reboot? Do I need to do anything with the ALPHA servers configuration?
Presumably I will need to reboot the ALPHA server as well.
Thanks for the help,
Kind regards, Mark.
I've now refreshed the VAX satellites system drive and installed it in the ALPHA server. The one problem I have remaining is that the VOTES the satellite is contributing to the cluster is 1. I believe for a proper satellite this should be 0.
Is this a case of updating the MODPARAMS.DAT on the satellite and autogen and reboot? Do I need to do anything with the ALPHA servers configuration?
Presumably I will need to reboot the ALPHA server as well.
Thanks for the help,
Kind regards, Mark.
I guess so, but remember that a scsi cluster was never possible with a VAX!
The reason for the behaviour is that diskdata and clusterdata follow different paths in a scsi cluster. Which isn't possible on VAXes (I think).
Then again it may be a bug in 8.3 of course!
------Origineel bericht------
Van: Peter Coghlan
Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] Satellite configuration/NCP crash
Verzonden: 16 september 2011 00:37
It should happen before disk access across the CI bus is even possible.
I think we'll have to agree to disagree on this one :-)
I've just booted my Vaxstation 2000 into an NI cluster with my
Vaxstation 3100. I gave the commands:
NCP SET CIRCUIT SVA-0 STATE OFF
NCP SET CIRCUIT SVA-0 STATE ON
on each node. The only effects were an opcom message complaining about
adjacency down and the loss of my decnet connections. Both nodes
continued to function quite happily while the circuit was off. No crash.
Anyway, it looks like avoiding issueing the SET CIRCUIT STATE OFF
command by making the changes to the permanent database and rebooting
was a good way of sidestepping the problem. Hopefully the bug is only
triggered when SET CIRCUIT STATE OFF is issued in Marks setup.
Apologies to gerry77. I missed your reply earlier and ended up repeating
much of what you said.
Regards,
Peter Coghlan.
On 2011-09-16 00:30, Mark Wickens wrote:
Just thinking aloud,
Can I run a bridge between the dongle based network and my own home
network?
If the bridge program on my network is wrapped with a script which
checks the dyndns hostname periodically against the recorded IP address,
cannot I not reconfigure the bridge on my home network and restart it if
required?
If this is possible it keeps my configuration in a realm I've got half a
chance of working out myself and saves me from hassling anyone else.
Presumably at home I would need to run two bridges on different ports -
with the current bridge linking back to Johnny as normal.
Short answer: yes.
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Mark,
Forget the bridge. Run Multinet at the event and either connect to your
end via Multinet (you are already running that), or connect to mine.
Either way it will just work. I personally, would use the dedicated
events area on the machines at the event and be done with it!
I can either supply you with my code for your end, or you can connect to
my end. Your choice. In the second scenerio, all I have to do is add
one (1) entry in the existing database and off we go!
-Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On
Behalf Of Mark Wickens
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 18:30
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: [HECnet] Another thought regarding dynamic bridge setup
Just thinking aloud,
Can I run a bridge between the dongle based network and my own home
network?
If the bridge program on my network is wrapped with a script which
checks the dyndns hostname periodically against the recorded IP address,
cannot I not reconfigure the bridge on my home network and restart it if
required?
If this is possible it keeps my configuration in a realm I've got half a
chance of working out myself and saves me from hassling anyone else.
Presumably at home I would need to run two bridges on different ports -
with the current bridge linking back to Johnny as normal.
Regards, Mark
