Definitely had DECnet.  The VT1300 was based on VAXELN, and was a stop-gap until the (much less costly) VT1200 could be finished and put into production. Based on a diskless VAXstation 3100.  Software was done mostly by the X11 group of the VAXELN group. Still have a system nameplate around here someplace.

Chuck

On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 8:55 PM Paul Koning <paulkoning@comcast.net> wrote:


> On Mar 8, 2023, at 8:48 PM, Johnny Billquist <bqt@softjar.se> wrote:
>
> On 2023-03-09 02:36, Dave McGuire wrote:
>> On 3/8/23 20:24, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>>>> For that matter, there are also DECnet nodes that are neither routers nor general purpose computers.
>>>> The network-connected PostScript printers (LPS40, LPS20) are an example, as are some of the earlier
>>>> X terminals.  (Wasn't there something called the VT1000?)
>>>
>>> There was both VXT1000 and VXT1200.
>>   And VT1000.
>
> I was pretty sure they were called VXT and not VT, but googling seems to suggest they were indeed called VT1000 and VT1200. There was also the VT1300 and VT2000, which I barely remembered.
>
> Anyway, I was wondering if they talked DECnet, and the Wikipedia article seems to suggest they actually didn't. They just spoke TCP/IP for X11, but they also talked LAT natively. But then you just had 24x80 terminals on that fancy screen. (And of course, they also had serial ports.)
>
>  Johnny

I'm not really sure, but at the time I participated in the design review of the first of those devices DEC wasn't doing TCP much yet, and was very much into X over DECnet.

        paul

_______________________________________________
HECnet mailing list -- hecnet@lists.dfupdate.se
To unsubscribe send an email to hecnet-leave@lists.dfupdate.se