At 11:48 PM +0200 9/6/11, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Does anyone have sources to RMS-11 V2.0. Specifically for RSX, in case they differ.
I don't believe I have that in my archives.
(And no, the TCP/IP is not available for distribution yet, but might be in the future, depending on interest and so on...)
Is this your own TCP/IP implementation or the one from Process Software?
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| | Photographer |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| My flickr Photostream |
| http://www.flickr.com/photos/33848088 at N03/ |
Does anyone have sources to RMS-11 V2.0. Specifically for RSX, in case they differ.
I have a tricky problem. I've written a device driver that pretends to look like a file system without using any ACP. It implements most functions an ACP normally implement. It also have some "odd" attributes set on the device to represent both what it actually is, and also to make FCS do "the right thing".
So, yes, using FCS, I can access this device just like any other, including opening files and so on... However, RMS-11 is not so cooperative, and I guess it means that I'm either not implementing some ACP function in enough detail to make RMS-11 happy, or else some device attribute it not set right, causing RMS-11 to treat the whole thing in a way that is too restricted, compared to FCS, in which case I want to figure out exactly how to set attributes to make RMS-11 do the right thing as well.
And just to explain what I'm doing in a little more detail:
I've actually done this for two devices. The first is the DOS device presented by E11 and other emulators. It's a device that gives access to the host file system.
The second device is actually TCP/IP. I can use normal tools and FCS functions to access the internet, just as easy as any other file. But not so, using RMS... :-(
As an example:
.pip ti:=tc:"130.238.19.25";21
220- ===============================================================
220- = Welcome to the Update Computer Club FTP archives! =
220- ===============================================================
220-
220- This server is maintained by the computer club Update at
220- Uppsala University in Uppsala, Sweden.
220-
220- You can find all the good stuff in the /pub directory.
220-
220- Please be advised that the club provides this service without
220- any guarantees, and we take no responsibility for any harm that
220- may come to you or your system from the use of this server, or
220- files obtained from this server.
220-
220- We do, however, try to ensure that everything here is correct.
220- If you have problems with the server, please contact the
220- FTP administrator ftpadm at Update.UU.SE.
220-
220
PIP -- I/O error on input file
TC0:[IPLIB]130238019.025;21 -- Timeout on request
.
Now, it would be awesome if I could make this play using RMS as well, since then I could easily write servers using BASIC+2 or other languages. FORTRAN 77 as well as C do also have FCS interfaces, so I can already use those, assuming I'm happy with limiting myself to FCS. But I want it all (of course). So - anyone who might be able to help?
(And no, the TCP/IP is not available for distribution yet, but might be in the future, depending on interest and so on...)
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
Steve,
I see your multinet tunnel to GORVAX is down - is there a problem your side or mine, you think?
Sampsa
On 6 Sep 2011, at 17:03, Steve Davidson wrote:
Mark,
If you need and (remote) help with this...
Let me know. I will make myself available as necessary.
-Steve
________________________________
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE on behalf of Mark Wickens
Sent: Tue 9/6/2011 02:55
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: [HECnet] DEC Legacy Event is nearly upon us...
Just a reminder that the DEC Legacy Event is nearly upon us!
October 8/9 in Windermere, more information here: http://declegacy.org.uk <http://declegacy.org.uk/>
The exhibits page gives a summary of the hardware that will be making an
appearance: http://wickensonline.co.uk/declegacy/hardware
I'm in the process of securing an internet connection. Hopefully I'll be
connecting a couple of my boxes to HECnet over the course of the
weekend, to show participants what they're missing out on.
Regards, Mark.
<winmail.dat>
Mark,
If you need and (remote) help with this...
Let me know. I will make myself available as necessary.
-Steve
________________________________
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE on behalf of Mark Wickens
Sent: Tue 9/6/2011 02:55
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: [HECnet] DEC Legacy Event is nearly upon us...
Just a reminder that the DEC Legacy Event is nearly upon us!
October 8/9 in Windermere, more information here: http://declegacy.org.uk <http://declegacy.org.uk/>
The exhibits page gives a summary of the hardware that will be making an
appearance: http://wickensonline.co.uk/declegacy/hardware
I'm in the process of securing an internet connection. Hopefully I'll be
connecting a couple of my boxes to HECnet over the course of the
weekend, to show participants what they're missing out on.
Regards, Mark.
Lots of Unices use "partition" names to designate part of all of a physical device; for example on NetBSD the suffix "d" by convention means "the whole disk". On the other hand, on Linux no suffix is the whole disk, and letter suffixes mean (real) partitions.
I didn't know that CDRoms could be partitioned. But you can check this easily: "cat /proc/partitions" shows you all the partitions that the OS can see (on all the visible disks).
paul
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] On Behalf Of Mark Benson
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 2:22 AM
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] SIMH on CentOS 5.6
On 6 Sep 2011, at 06:52, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
The dd command ought to produce a bootable copy of the cdrom. On Tru64
the correct partition is If=/dev/disks/ cdrom0c
When I dd'd off a copy of the VAX VMS CD-ROM it didn't work for me initially either. Now I can't remember which way round it was now, but I think I dd'd the whole CD-ROM and it didn't work and then I dd'd off only the *partition* with the data in and that worked fine. Either that or the other way around. From the looks of the quote above you only need the partition.
Memory is terrible, sorry :)
--
Mark Benson
My Blog:
<http://markbenson.org/blog>
Follow me on Twitter:
http://twitter.com/mdbenson
"Never send a human to do a machine's job..."
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 22:41:35 -0700, you wrote:
Does anyone have any pointers for making an ISO image of the CD? Am I doing
it wrong? I would like to make a backup of the disk because I'm already on
my second physical copy and would like to back it up before I lose it again
You may already know, but... Please note that a VMS CD-ROM bootable image is
not ISO 9660 formatted. So don't be misleaded if a correctly made image does
not mount on Linux or whatever (or does not show up on Windows): don't take
that as a test! The only way to check for a VMS CD-ROM image integrity is by
having it booted or mounted in VMS.
There is also a vmscd utility that can be used to inspect and extract data
from such an image on Linux. Just look for it with Google.
There is no difference between a VMS CD-ROM bootable image and a classical
VMS hard disk image: they are both structured as an ODS-2 filesystem.
Anyway, VMS can also mount and use ISO 9660 CD-ROM data discs and images.
HTH, :-)
G.
P.S. Itanium-bootable images are different.
Just a reminder that the DEC Legacy Event is nearly upon us!
October 8/9 in Windermere, more information here: http://declegacy.org.uk
The exhibits page gives a summary of the hardware that will be making an appearance: http://wickensonline.co.uk/declegacy/hardware
I'm in the process of securing an internet connection. Hopefully I'll be connecting a couple of my boxes to HECnet over the course of the weekend, to show participants what they're missing out on.
Regards, Mark.
On 6 Sep 2011, at 07:30, Ian McLaughlin wrote:
When I dd'd off a copy of the VAX VMS CD-ROM it didn't work for me initially either. Now I can't remember which way round it was now, but I think I dd'd the whole CD-ROM and it didn't work and then I dd'd off only the *partition* with the data in and that worked fine. Either that or the other way around. From the looks of the quote above you only need the partition.
Memory is terrible, sorry :)
On my system (CentOS 5.6) I see the /dev/cdrom device which is symbolically linked to /dev/hda (which makes sense - it's the only IDE device I have in the machine). There is no hda1 or other devices for the partitions. fdisk /dev/hda comes back with an invalid partition table.
I remember how it went now - I was doing it on a Mac which uses a BSD disk structure. I dd'd the disk device (/dev/disk6) and it wouldn't work. I then dd'd the slice that reported as the actual volume (/dev/disk6s0) and it worked a charm.
I don't know how that's represented in Linux, however. Also fdisk won't show a partition table for a CD-ROM, I don't believe, because they are not structured as hard drive partitions. I put my VMS VAX CD-ROM in my Ubuntu box and the Disk Utility reports it at /dev/sr0 which is a SCSI ID but my Microserver has a weird disk controller.
I honestly don't know how to approach it unless you have something like gnuparted to hand to look at the disk?
--
Mark Benson
My Blog:
<http://markbenson.org/blog>
Follow me on Twitter:
http://twitter.com/mdbenson
"Never send a human to do a machine's job..."
On 2011-09-05, at 11:21 PM, Mark Benson wrote:
On 6 Sep 2011, at 06:52, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
The dd command ought to produce a bootable copy of the cdrom. On Tru64 the correct partition is
If=/dev/disks/ cdrom0c
When I dd'd off a copy of the VAX VMS CD-ROM it didn't work for me initially either. Now I can't remember which way round it was now, but I think I dd'd the whole CD-ROM and it didn't work and then I dd'd off only the *partition* with the data in and that worked fine. Either that or the other way around. From the looks of the quote above you only need the partition.
Memory is terrible, sorry :)
On my system (CentOS 5.6) I see the /dev/cdrom device which is symbolically linked to /dev/hda (which makes sense - it's the only IDE device I have in the machine). There is no hda1 or other devices for the partitions. fdisk /dev/hda comes back with an invalid partition table.
Ian
On 6 Sep 2011, at 06:52, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
The dd command ought to produce a bootable copy of the cdrom. On Tru64 the correct partition is
If=/dev/disks/ cdrom0c
When I dd'd off a copy of the VAX VMS CD-ROM it didn't work for me initially either. Now I can't remember which way round it was now, but I think I dd'd the whole CD-ROM and it didn't work and then I dd'd off only the *partition* with the data in and that worked fine. Either that or the other way around. From the looks of the quote above you only need the partition.
Memory is terrible, sorry :)
--
Mark Benson
My Blog:
<http://markbenson.org/blog>
Follow me on Twitter:
http://twitter.com/mdbenson
"Never send a human to do a machine's job..."
The dd command ought to produce a bootable copy of the cdrom. On Tru64 the correct partition is
If=/dev/disks/ cdrom0c
Your unix flavor may be different.
Or use a cdwriter program that writes to disk, like Nero on Windows does.
Verzonden vanaf mijn draadloze BlackBerry -toestel
From: Ian McLaughlin <ian at platinum.net>
Sender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 22:41:35 -0700
To: <hecnet at Update.UU.SE>
ReplyTo: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: Re: [HECnet] SIMH on CentOS 5.6
Thanks for the response. I think my issue has something to do with making the ISO image. I used 'dd if=/dev/cdrom of=cd.iso' which made a 676Mb file. But using this file gives me the error. I then tried attaching directly to the cdrom drive in vax.ini using 'attach -r rq3 /dev/cdrom' and it worked! I was able to do a full installation from the actual physical media.
Does anyone have any pointers for making an ISO image of the CD? Am I doing it wrong? I would like to make a backup of the disk because I'm already on my second physical copy and would like to back it up before I lose it again :)
Ian
On 2011-09-05, at 10:20 PM, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
While in simh commandmode, show the devices that are seen in simh.
Do the same in srm mode: sho dev
The boot device type may be DK, RQ or DQ, I forgot
You must have typed it in: to assign the hosts cd drive to a iunit name.
Verzonden vanaf mijn draadloze BlackBerry -toestel
From: Ian McLaughlin <ian at platinum.net>
Sender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:57:38 -0700
To: <hecnet at Update.UU.SE>
ReplyTo: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: [HECnet] SIMH on CentOS 5.6
Hello All,
I'm trying to compile and run SIMH on CentOS 5.6. I've followed the instructions at http://www.wherry.com/gadgets/retrocomputing/vax-simh.html but when I try to boot from the CD image, I get:
[root at zork data]# /usr/local/vax/bin/vax
VAX simulator V3.8-1
NVR: buffering file in memory
RQ: unit is read only
Eth: opened eth0
KA655-B V5.3, VMB 2.7
Performing normal system tests.
40..39..38..37..36..35..34..33..32..31..30..29..28..27..26..25..
24..23..22..21..20..19..18..17..16..15..14..13..12..11..10..09..
08..07..06..05..04..03..
Tests completed.
>>>boot dua3
(BOOT/R5:0 DUA3
2..
-DUA3
?42 NOSUCHFILE, DUA
HALT instruction, PC: 00000C1A (MOVL (R11),SP)
sim>
Any ideas about what I might be doing wrong? The CD image file I made directly from the Montagar 7.3 CD. The vax.ini file is exactly as shown on the instructions page.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions!
Ian
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here
Thanks for the response. I think my issue has something to do with making the ISO image. I used 'dd if=/dev/cdrom of=cd.iso' which made a 676Mb file. But using this file gives me the error. I then tried attaching directly to the cdrom drive in vax.ini using 'attach -r rq3 /dev/cdrom' and it worked! I was able to do a full installation from the actual physical media.
Does anyone have any pointers for making an ISO image of the CD? Am I doing it wrong? I would like to make a backup of the disk because I'm already on my second physical copy and would like to back it up before I lose it again :)
Ian
On 2011-09-05, at 10:20 PM, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
While in simh commandmode, show the devices that are seen in simh.
Do the same in srm mode: sho dev
The boot device type may be DK, RQ or DQ, I forgot
You must have typed it in: to assign the hosts cd drive to a iunit name.
Verzonden vanaf mijn draadloze BlackBerry -toestel
From: Ian McLaughlin <ian at platinum.net>
Sender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:57:38 -0700
To: <hecnet at Update.UU.SE>
ReplyTo: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: [HECnet] SIMH on CentOS 5.6
Hello All,
I'm trying to compile and run SIMH on CentOS 5.6. I've followed the instructions at http://www.wherry.com/gadgets/retrocomputing/vax-simh.html but when I try to boot from the CD image, I get:
[root at zork data]# /usr/local/vax/bin/vax
VAX simulator V3.8-1
NVR: buffering file in memory
RQ: unit is read only
Eth: opened eth0
KA655-B V5.3, VMB 2.7
Performing normal system tests.
40..39..38..37..36..35..34..33..32..31..30..29..28..27..26..25..
24..23..22..21..20..19..18..17..16..15..14..13..12..11..10..09..
08..07..06..05..04..03..
Tests completed.
>>>boot dua3
(BOOT/R5:0 DUA3
2..
-DUA3
?42 NOSUCHFILE, DUA
HALT instruction, PC: 00000C1A (MOVL (R11),SP)
sim>
Any ideas about what I might be doing wrong? The CD image file I made directly from the Montagar 7.3 CD. The vax.ini file is exactly as shown on the instructions page.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions!
Ian
---
Filter service subscribers can train this email as spam or not-spam here
While in simh commandmode, show the devices that are seen in simh.
Do the same in srm mode: sho dev
The boot device type may be DK, RQ or DQ, I forgot
You must have typed it in: to assign the hosts cd drive to a iunit name.
Verzonden vanaf mijn draadloze BlackBerry -toestel
From: Ian McLaughlin <ian at platinum.net>
Sender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:57:38 -0700
To: <hecnet at Update.UU.SE>
ReplyTo: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: [HECnet] SIMH on CentOS 5.6
Hello All,
I'm trying to compile and run SIMH on CentOS 5.6. I've followed the instructions at http://www.wherry.com/gadgets/retrocomputing/vax-simh.html but when I try to boot from the CD image, I get:
[root at zork data]# /usr/local/vax/bin/vax
VAX simulator V3.8-1
NVR: buffering file in memory
RQ: unit is read only
Eth: opened eth0
KA655-B V5.3, VMB 2.7
Performing normal system tests.
40..39..38..37..36..35..34..33..32..31..30..29..28..27..26..25..
24..23..22..21..20..19..18..17..16..15..14..13..12..11..10..09..
08..07..06..05..04..03..
Tests completed.
>>>boot dua3
(BOOT/R5:0 DUA3
2..
-DUA3
?42 NOSUCHFILE, DUA
HALT instruction, PC: 00000C1A (MOVL (R11),SP)
sim>
Any ideas about what I might be doing wrong? The CD image file I made directly from the Montagar 7.3 CD. The vax.ini file is exactly as shown on the instructions page.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions!
Ian
The KZPSA is a differential scsi controller. It supports dual hosts and may be used as a cluster interconnect (data only, no cluster control messages).
------Origineel bericht------
Van: Peter Coghlan
Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] And yet more begging: KZPAC style controller?
Verzonden: 6 september 2011 00:49
Here's a photo of mine, can you draw the bit I need to change onto it, or the general area:
http://sampsa.com/wp-content/kzstyleboard.jpg
That picture reminded me of something. I have what I thought was an extra long
and overly complex PCI SCSI card in my stash. It has the same Intel i960 as
the card in the picture but doesn't have the extra daughter board. It is
marked KZPSAPS and has a single 68 pin external SCSI connector and five
resistor packs commonly found as terminators on old-style (ie non-low-voltage)
differential SCSI cards.
I tried firing it up in my AS1000A and found that SRM sees it as follows:
SHOW CONF
12 DEC KZPSA pke0.7.0.12.0 SCSI Bus ID 7
SHOW DEV
pke0.7.0.12.0 PKE0 SCSI Bus ID 7 R01 A11
VMS (7.1-2) sees it as:
Device PKA0:, device type KZTSA/SCSI (SIMport), is online, error logging is
enabled.
Error count 0 Operations completed 24
Owner process "" Owner UIC [SYSTEM]
Owner process ID 00000000 Dev Prot S:RWPL,O:RWPL,G,W
Reference count 0 Default buffer size 0
Anyone know what (if anything) is special about this card?
Regards,
Peter Coghlan.
Verzonden vanaf mijn draadloze BlackBerry -toestel
On 11-09-05 05:28 PM, Sampsa Laine wrote:
Oh the complexities of the world we live in:
Nah, there's nothing to it. There's just a lot of nothing. :)
Phil
So I'm willing to live with the single storage array I have for now, and am thinking of acquiring say off ebay, a second controller.
Which model should I go for? I only need one port but would like it to support as large a logical drive as possible (well, I've got 7x18 GB drives in a stack to use)..
Suggestions?
Hello All,
I'm trying to compile and run SIMH on CentOS 5.6. I've followed the instructions at http://www.wherry.com/gadgets/retrocomputing/vax-simh.html but when I try to boot from the CD image, I get:
[root at zork data]# /usr/local/vax/bin/vax
VAX simulator V3.8-1
NVR: buffering file in memory
RQ: unit is read only
Eth: opened eth0
KA655-B V5.3, VMB 2.7
Performing normal system tests.
40..39..38..37..36..35..34..33..32..31..30..29..28..27..26..25..
24..23..22..21..20..19..18..17..16..15..14..13..12..11..10..09..
08..07..06..05..04..03..
Tests completed.
>>>boot dua3
(BOOT/R5:0 DUA3
2..
-DUA3
?42 NOSUCHFILE, DUA
HALT instruction, PC: 00000C1A (MOVL (R11),SP)
sim>
Any ideas about what I might be doing wrong? The CD image file I made directly from the Montagar 7.3 CD. The vax.ini file is exactly as shown on the instructions page.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions!
Ian
Here's a photo of mine, can you draw the bit I need to change onto it, or the general area:
http://sampsa.com/wp-content/kzstyleboard.jpg
That picture reminded me of something. I have what I thought was an extra long
and overly complex PCI SCSI card in my stash. It has the same Intel i960 as
the card in the picture but doesn't have the extra daughter board. It is
marked KZPSAPS and has a single 68 pin external SCSI connector and five
resistor packs commonly found as terminators on old-style (ie non-low-voltage)
differential SCSI cards.
I tried firing it up in my AS1000A and found that SRM sees it as follows:
SHOW CONF
12 DEC KZPSA pke0.7.0.12.0 SCSI Bus ID 7
SHOW DEV
pke0.7.0.12.0 PKE0 SCSI Bus ID 7 R01 A11
VMS (7.1-2) sees it as:
Device PKA0:, device type KZTSA/SCSI (SIMport), is online, error logging is
enabled.
Error count 0 Operations completed 24
Owner process "" Owner UIC [SYSTEM]
Owner process ID 00000000 Dev Prot S:RWPL,O:RWPL,G,W
Reference count 0 Default buffer size 0
Anyone know what (if anything) is special about this card?
Regards,
Peter Coghlan.
Well, it all went tits up - upgraded the Firmware on the 800 and it doesn't even see the controller anymore.
So if anyone comes across a spare KZPAC-type device, I'd be very interested.
Sampsa
On 5 Sep 2011, at 21:17, Marc Chametzky wrote:
I understand there's a SWXCR utility or something for this?
I did some digging and found that I still had the install kits that I
used to use on my Alpha system way back when. I put it into DUSTY::, but
it seems that I'm offline at the moment.
Oh, and I don't think that you can use this to initialize the arrays while VMS is running, but it's been so long that I cannot recall.
--Marc
I understand there's a SWXCR utility or something for this?
I did some digging and found that I still had the install kits that I
used to use on my Alpha system way back when. I put it into DUSTY::, but
it seems that I'm offline at the moment.
Oh, and I don't think that you can use this to initialize the arrays while VMS is running, but it's been so long that I cannot recall.
--Marc
On 11-09-05 02:32 PM, Sampsa Laine wrote:
Yeah, MMJ to MMJ is what I wanted
Good.
- you were asking about delivery options and I would suggest just picking the standard one (you're in the UK, i hope), which is is signed for delivery?
Guess you didn't get that e-mail. Short answer: I'm in Canada. About $4-7 if you want it in somewhere around a week. Much more for anything faster, like $50 - $100 or airfare + expenses for hand delivery. ;)
They can go in the post tomorrow if you tell me where to send them.
Phil
Ah Sampsa, that's not a filter but rather faint memory...
It's been sent now.
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE [mailto:owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE] Namens
Sampsa Laine
Verzonden: maandag, september 2011 21:38
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: Re: [HECnet] And yet more begging: KZPAC style controller?
Still didn't get it, prob some stupid mail filter somewhere - got a website
to upload it to?
On 5 Sep 2011, at 19:40, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
Ok, I'll resend it
Verzonden vanaf mijn draadloze BlackBerryR-toestel
-----Original Message-----
From: Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com>
Sender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 19:26:10
To: <hecnet at Update.UU.SE>
Reply-To: hecnet at Update.UU.SESubject: Re: [HECnet] And yet more begging:
KZPAC style controller?
By the way, the majordomo does not seem to like large attachments so if
you want to send back a picture file send in directly to sampsa at mac.com.
Sampsa
On 5 Sep 2011, at 17:47, Sampsa Laine wrote:
Here's a photo of mine, can you draw the bit I need to change onto it, or
the general area:
http://sampsa.com/wp-content/kzstyleboard.jpg
On 5 Sep 2011, at 17:28, Sampsa Laine wrote:
Any photos? I'm confused by the instructions.
On 5 Sep 2011, at 17:16, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
Sampsa, study the small PCB that sits on top of double plastic
connector. It's a kind of dipswitch: there's a connection to be made. Put
the pcb of the working one iin the other.
Verzonden vanaf mijn draadloze BlackBerryR-toestel
-----Original Message-----
From: Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com>
Sender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 16:42:39
To: <hecnet at Update.UU.SE>
Reply-To: hecnet at Update.UU.SESubject: Re: [HECnet] And yet more
begging: KZPAC style controller?
Yup, bought a 3 channel Mylex card, even showed up in SRM as drb,
happily ran the RCU to build the drives.
Then VMS doesn't see it. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH. I think they did more
than rebrand it.
Sampsa
On 5 Sep 2011, at 14:45, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
The KZPAC is DEC's codename for the Mylex 960 RAID controller, right?
------Origineel bericht------
Van: Sampsa Laine
Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: [HECnet] And yet more begging: KZPAC style controller?
Verzonden: 5 september 2011 10:33
I've finally brought CHIMPY up from the dead, and are using its
internal KZPAC to drive a BA365.
I've LOVE another kzpac controlller. and if you have a spare, any
chance you can consider a
donation...
Sampsa
Verzonden vanaf mijn draadloze BlackBerryR-toestel