Well,
After a very convoluted route I've got my draytek router up and running with a 3G dongle. I can browser the internet, use telnet etc, but it appears the bridge traffic is not getting through.
$$ dir mim::
%DIRECT-E-OPENIN, error opening MIM::*.*;* as input
-RMS-E-FND, ACP file or directory lookup failed
-SYSTEM-F-UNREACHABLE, remote node is not currently reachable
If I manually try and telnet to psilo.update.uu.se port 4711 I get a network is unreachable. If I ping the same address the ping gets through.
Is this something to do with a restriction on port numbers? Is there anything we can do about this, or try?
Thanks for the help,
Mark.
Here's a transcript of what I tried. I can also use ssh no problems.
atom:/usr/local/bridge# telnet psilo.update.uu.se 4711
Trying 130.238.19.25...
Trying 2001:6b0:b:fff0::19...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Network is unreachable
atom:/usr/local/bridge# ping 130.238.19.25
PING 130.238.19.25 (130.238.19.25) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 130.238.19.25: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=132 ms
64 bytes from 130.238.19.25: icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=128 ms
64 bytes from 130.238.19.25: icmp_seq=3 ttl=47 time=134 ms
On 11/09/2011 20:52, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2011-09-11 21.45, Mark Wickens wrote:
Guys,
Looking to tap into your collective knowledge.
I'd like to set up a 3G dongle for the DEC Legacy event.
The plan will be to add my machine as an area router then other
participants machines into that area.
Steve Davidson has pointed out that there are decnet numbers allocated
for experimental purposes.
I think I understand how to setup my 3G dongle to connect to the
internet via an ubuntu machine. I am happy setting up a DHCP and DNS
server on the same machine. The bit I don't understand is how I would
fit the hecnet bridge into this network. Normally on my DSL router I
have a port redirection rule setup on port 4711 to point to a Debian
based box on my LAN.
How would I achieve the same effect on a linux box? If I run the bridge
on the same box, does this negate the need for a rule?
If all this works, is there a restriction of one decnet area per lan
segment? Can I run two areas on my side of the bridge?
Thanks for the help, Mark
In general, if/when you have a setup like that, it's the same as if you connect your computer directly to the internet. So, your Linux box is at the same location your DSL router is. So, there are no rules to setup to pass a packet through the router. The reason for the rule is that your DSL router acts as a firewall (and possibly NAT), which is what you need to circumvent for the bridge. No firewall/NAT box in between means no need to punch a hole through it.
So you should be able to run the bridge directly on that box, and it should work. All however, also depends on what your mobile operator might be doing...
Area number for experimental is probably not going to help you, though. You already have an area. Adding more nodes to it is hardly any different than having a new area setup, except that if you setup a new area, you will need an area router for it. I don't really see much point in the "experimental" area we have reserved, but since we have plenty of areas anyway, there is no harm in it. Anyone using that area can expect things to not work though, as someone else might also be using the same area, and conflict/confusion might follow.
As for having several different areas on the same lan, no problem.
Johnny
Open the box and doisconnect the powersupply wires. Measure voltages at the connectors, start with the disk power outlets since these voltages are known.
HP has maintenance manuals on-line for some systems, check that.
------Origineel bericht------
Van: Sampsa Laine
Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: [HECnet] CHIMPY's died
Verzonden: 11 september 2011 21:43
Chimpy wont boot for some reason anymore.
I've reseated all the RAM, the CPU and PCI cards - but get nothing. Not even the diagnostic beeps.
Any ideas?
Sampsa
Verzonden vanaf mijn draadloze BlackBerry -toestel
Sampsa Laine wrote:
Chimpy wont boot for some reason anymore.
I've reseated all the RAM, the CPU and PCI cards - but get nothing. Not even the diagnostic beeps.
Any ideas?
Blown ROM chip somewhere?
Peace... Sridhar
oh man that sucks!!!
Beyond emulation I don't know.. it always sucks to lose cool hardware... :(
-----Original Message-----
From: Sampsa Laine [mailto:sampsa at mac.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2011 3:43 PM
To: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Subject: [HECnet] CHIMPY's died
Chimpy wont boot for some reason anymore.
I've reseated all the RAM, the CPU and PCI cards - but get nothing. Not even
the diagnostic beeps.
Any ideas?
Sampsa
try leaving it alone, unplugged for a week, it may not work in your
case but who knows
it happened to me only once in life, but I had a dead machine
resurrecting by itself a week later
without doing absolutely nothing, I still don't know what happened
that box worked for twenty years "after" the problem
Also on a VAX, I had a dead machine that started working again
but this one had lights, just needed to recharge something
before it would start running tests again
this box had been unplugged for too many years
sometimes a bad battery pack does also some strange things
cheers
:)
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
The power comes on and stuff happens, but no diagnostic beeps or anything.
Could it still be the power supply?
Sampsa
On 11 Sep 2011, at 21:06, Gregg Levine wrote:
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
Chimpy wont boot for some reason anymore.
I've reseated all the RAM, the CPU and PCI cards - but get nothing. Not even the diagnostic beeps.
Any ideas?
Sampsa
Hello!
Checked the power supply? It might have blown the fuses/circuit
breakers on it. What was it doing before it unceremoniously shut
itself down?
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
Hello!
It most certainly could be. Is that fellow the oldest in your
collection or the youngest? Remember computers age faster then people,
but not faster then cats. (We will leave out the other entity here,
and of course why.)
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
And note that in any local ncp database nodenames are unique.
Verzonden vanaf mijn draadloze BlackBerry -toestel
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnny Billquist <bqt at softjar.se>
Sender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 22:52:52
To: <hecnet at Update.UU.SE>
Reply-To: hecnet at Update.UU.SESubject: Re: [HECnet] HecNET via 3G Dongle
On 2011-09-11 22:15, Mark Wickens wrote:
On 11/09/11 20:52, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2011-09-11 21.45, Mark Wickens wrote:
Guys,
Looking to tap into your collective knowledge.
I'd like to set up a 3G dongle for the DEC Legacy event.
The plan will be to add my machine as an area router then other
participants machines into that area.
Steve Davidson has pointed out that there are decnet numbers allocated
for experimental purposes.
I think I understand how to setup my 3G dongle to connect to the
internet via an ubuntu machine. I am happy setting up a DHCP and DNS
server on the same machine. The bit I don't understand is how I would
fit the hecnet bridge into this network. Normally on my DSL router I
have a port redirection rule setup on port 4711 to point to a Debian
based box on my LAN.
How would I achieve the same effect on a linux box? If I run the bridge
on the same box, does this negate the need for a rule?
If all this works, is there a restriction of one decnet area per lan
segment? Can I run two areas on my side of the bridge?
Thanks for the help, Mark
In general, if/when you have a setup like that, it's the same as if
you connect your computer directly to the internet. So, your Linux box
is at the same location your DSL router is. So, there are no rules to
setup to pass a packet through the router. The reason for the rule is
that your DSL router acts as a firewall (and possibly NAT), which is
what you need to circumvent for the bridge. No firewall/NAT box in
between means no need to punch a hole through it.
So you should be able to run the bridge directly on that box, and it
should work. All however, also depends on what your mobile operator
might be doing...
Area number for experimental is probably not going to help you,
though. You already have an area. Adding more nodes to it is hardly
any different than having a new area setup, except that if you setup a
new area, you will need an area router for it. I don't really see much
point in the "experimental" area we have reserved, but since we have
plenty of areas anyway, there is no harm in it. Anyone using that area
can expect things to not work though, as someone else might also be
using the same area, and conflict/confusion might follow.
As for having several different areas on the same lan, no problem.
Johnny
Hi Johnny,
Thanks for clarifying that. I'll need to supply a node allocation to
participants before the event, and as I am sending out an email shortly
I'd like to provide the most accurate picture of what we can do - and
have an answer when people ask. I'll be taking my AlphaServer 1000A
(nodename SLAVE) which is acting as an area router for area 4, so I can
just plug that in and it will work. Is it best then to give you some new
node names before the event for area 4, depending on how many people
want to participate?
Just to clarify: there is no real need to provide nodenames. DECnet
don't have a concept of a centralized nodename database. I just try to
keep one around for our own convenience. For an event like this, just
node numbers needs to be organized. People participating can then define
their own nodename database to their hearts content. Every machine on a
DECnet can have their own nodename database for the network, which don't
have to match anything anyone else have anyway.
If you want to provide some sort of service in this area, what you could
do is take their requests, and set those up on a machine you have there,
and then tell them to copy the nodename database from you to have them
have some kind of unified, consistent view. On that machine you can also
have the nodenames setup for the rest of HECnet, so that they get those
too...
And if there are name conflicts, you can decide how you want to handle
it. Probably, in most cases, people there will be less interested in
random nodes on HECnet than their fellow participants in the event, so
you might want to allow them to grab "used" names anyway.
So, bring SLAVE:: to the event, and use that as a central source for
nodenames for participants at the event. Afterwards you can re-copy the
nodename database from MIM:: to get you back to the "normal" life.
And you can let them use any nodenumber you want on area 4, except the
one you have SLAVE:: have, I guess. :-)
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
The power comes on and stuff happens, but no diagnostic beeps or anything.
Could it still be the power supply?
Sampsa
On 11 Sep 2011, at 21:06, Gregg Levine wrote:
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
Chimpy wont boot for some reason anymore.
I've reseated all the RAM, the CPU and PCI cards - but get nothing. Not even the diagnostic beeps.
Any ideas?
Sampsa
Hello!
Checked the power supply? It might have blown the fuses/circuit
breakers on it. What was it doing before it unceremoniously shut
itself down?
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
Hello!
It most certainly could be. Is that fellow the oldest in your
collection or the youngest? Remember computers age faster then people,
but not faster then cats. (We will leave out the other entity here,
and of course why.)
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On 2011-09-11 22:15, Mark Wickens wrote:
On 11/09/11 20:52, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2011-09-11 21.45, Mark Wickens wrote:
Guys,
Looking to tap into your collective knowledge.
I'd like to set up a 3G dongle for the DEC Legacy event.
The plan will be to add my machine as an area router then other
participants machines into that area.
Steve Davidson has pointed out that there are decnet numbers allocated
for experimental purposes.
I think I understand how to setup my 3G dongle to connect to the
internet via an ubuntu machine. I am happy setting up a DHCP and DNS
server on the same machine. The bit I don't understand is how I would
fit the hecnet bridge into this network. Normally on my DSL router I
have a port redirection rule setup on port 4711 to point to a Debian
based box on my LAN.
How would I achieve the same effect on a linux box? If I run the bridge
on the same box, does this negate the need for a rule?
If all this works, is there a restriction of one decnet area per lan
segment? Can I run two areas on my side of the bridge?
Thanks for the help, Mark
In general, if/when you have a setup like that, it's the same as if
you connect your computer directly to the internet. So, your Linux box
is at the same location your DSL router is. So, there are no rules to
setup to pass a packet through the router. The reason for the rule is
that your DSL router acts as a firewall (and possibly NAT), which is
what you need to circumvent for the bridge. No firewall/NAT box in
between means no need to punch a hole through it.
So you should be able to run the bridge directly on that box, and it
should work. All however, also depends on what your mobile operator
might be doing...
Area number for experimental is probably not going to help you,
though. You already have an area. Adding more nodes to it is hardly
any different than having a new area setup, except that if you setup a
new area, you will need an area router for it. I don't really see much
point in the "experimental" area we have reserved, but since we have
plenty of areas anyway, there is no harm in it. Anyone using that area
can expect things to not work though, as someone else might also be
using the same area, and conflict/confusion might follow.
As for having several different areas on the same lan, no problem.
Johnny
Hi Johnny,
Thanks for clarifying that. I'll need to supply a node allocation to
participants before the event, and as I am sending out an email shortly
I'd like to provide the most accurate picture of what we can do - and
have an answer when people ask. I'll be taking my AlphaServer 1000A
(nodename SLAVE) which is acting as an area router for area 4, so I can
just plug that in and it will work. Is it best then to give you some new
node names before the event for area 4, depending on how many people
want to participate?
Just to clarify: there is no real need to provide nodenames. DECnet don't have a concept of a centralized nodename database. I just try to keep one around for our own convenience. For an event like this, just node numbers needs to be organized. People participating can then define their own nodename database to their hearts content. Every machine on a DECnet can have their own nodename database for the network, which don't have to match anything anyone else have anyway.
If you want to provide some sort of service in this area, what you could do is take their requests, and set those up on a machine you have there, and then tell them to copy the nodename database from you to have them have some kind of unified, consistent view. On that machine you can also have the nodenames setup for the rest of HECnet, so that they get those too...
And if there are name conflicts, you can decide how you want to handle it. Probably, in most cases, people there will be less interested in random nodes on HECnet than their fellow participants in the event, so you might want to allow them to grab "used" names anyway.
So, bring SLAVE:: to the event, and use that as a central source for nodenames for participants at the event. Afterwards you can re-copy the nodename database from MIM:: to get you back to the "normal" life.
And you can let them use any nodenumber you want on area 4, except the one you have SLAVE:: have, I guess. :-)
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
The power comes on and stuff happens, but no diagnostic beeps or anything.
Could it still be the power supply?
Sampsa
On 11 Sep 2011, at 21:06, Gregg Levine wrote:
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
Chimpy wont boot for some reason anymore.
I've reseated all the RAM, the CPU and PCI cards - but get nothing. Not even the diagnostic beeps.
Any ideas?
Sampsa
Hello!
Checked the power supply? It might have blown the fuses/circuit
breakers on it. What was it doing before it unceremoniously shut
itself down?
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On 11/09/11 20:52, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2011-09-11 21.45, Mark Wickens wrote:
Guys,
Looking to tap into your collective knowledge.
I'd like to set up a 3G dongle for the DEC Legacy event.
The plan will be to add my machine as an area router then other
participants machines into that area.
Steve Davidson has pointed out that there are decnet numbers allocated
for experimental purposes.
I think I understand how to setup my 3G dongle to connect to the
internet via an ubuntu machine. I am happy setting up a DHCP and DNS
server on the same machine. The bit I don't understand is how I would
fit the hecnet bridge into this network. Normally on my DSL router I
have a port redirection rule setup on port 4711 to point to a Debian
based box on my LAN.
How would I achieve the same effect on a linux box? If I run the bridge
on the same box, does this negate the need for a rule?
If all this works, is there a restriction of one decnet area per lan
segment? Can I run two areas on my side of the bridge?
Thanks for the help, Mark
In general, if/when you have a setup like that, it's the same as if you connect your computer directly to the internet. So, your Linux box is at the same location your DSL router is. So, there are no rules to setup to pass a packet through the router. The reason for the rule is that your DSL router acts as a firewall (and possibly NAT), which is what you need to circumvent for the bridge. No firewall/NAT box in between means no need to punch a hole through it.
So you should be able to run the bridge directly on that box, and it should work. All however, also depends on what your mobile operator might be doing...
Area number for experimental is probably not going to help you, though. You already have an area. Adding more nodes to it is hardly any different than having a new area setup, except that if you setup a new area, you will need an area router for it. I don't really see much point in the "experimental" area we have reserved, but since we have plenty of areas anyway, there is no harm in it. Anyone using that area can expect things to not work though, as someone else might also be using the same area, and conflict/confusion might follow.
As for having several different areas on the same lan, no problem.
Johnny
Hi Johnny,
Thanks for clarifying that. I'll need to supply a node allocation to participants before the event, and as I am sending out an email shortly I'd like to provide the most accurate picture of what we can do - and have an answer when people ask. I'll be taking my AlphaServer 1000A (nodename SLAVE) which is acting as an area router for area 4, so I can just plug that in and it will work. Is it best then to give you some new node names before the event for area 4, depending on how many people want to participate?
I've also found that my Vigor 2800 supports wireless dongles, which might make life incredibly simple. It's going to be one that either works or it doesn't.
Regards, Mark.
Regards, Mark
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Sampsa Laine <sampsa at mac.com> wrote:
Chimpy wont boot for some reason anymore.
I've reseated all the RAM, the CPU and PCI cards - but get nothing. Not even the diagnostic beeps.
Any ideas?
Sampsa
Hello!
Checked the power supply? It might have blown the fuses/circuit
breakers on it. What was it doing before it unceremoniously shut
itself down?
-----
Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8 at gmail.com
"This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
On 2011-09-11 21.45, Mark Wickens wrote:
Guys,
Looking to tap into your collective knowledge.
I'd like to set up a 3G dongle for the DEC Legacy event.
The plan will be to add my machine as an area router then other
participants machines into that area.
Steve Davidson has pointed out that there are decnet numbers allocated
for experimental purposes.
I think I understand how to setup my 3G dongle to connect to the
internet via an ubuntu machine. I am happy setting up a DHCP and DNS
server on the same machine. The bit I don't understand is how I would
fit the hecnet bridge into this network. Normally on my DSL router I
have a port redirection rule setup on port 4711 to point to a Debian
based box on my LAN.
How would I achieve the same effect on a linux box? If I run the bridge
on the same box, does this negate the need for a rule?
If all this works, is there a restriction of one decnet area per lan
segment? Can I run two areas on my side of the bridge?
Thanks for the help, Mark
In general, if/when you have a setup like that, it's the same as if you connect your computer directly to the internet. So, your Linux box is at the same location your DSL router is. So, there are no rules to setup to pass a packet through the router. The reason for the rule is that your DSL router acts as a firewall (and possibly NAT), which is what you need to circumvent for the bridge. No firewall/NAT box in between means no need to punch a hole through it.
So you should be able to run the bridge directly on that box, and it should work. All however, also depends on what your mobile operator might be doing...
Area number for experimental is probably not going to help you, though. You already have an area. Adding more nodes to it is hardly any different than having a new area setup, except that if you setup a new area, you will need an area router for it. I don't really see much point in the "experimental" area we have reserved, but since we have plenty of areas anyway, there is no harm in it. Anyone using that area can expect things to not work though, as someone else might also be using the same area, and conflict/confusion might follow.
As for having several different areas on the same lan, no problem.
Johnny
Guys,
Looking to tap into your collective knowledge.
I'd like to set up a 3G dongle for the DEC Legacy event.
The plan will be to add my machine as an area router then other participants machines into that area.
Steve Davidson has pointed out that there are decnet numbers allocated for experimental purposes.
I think I understand how to setup my 3G dongle to connect to the internet via an ubuntu machine. I am happy setting up a DHCP and DNS server on the same machine. The bit I don't understand is how I would fit the hecnet bridge into this network. Normally on my DSL router I have a port redirection rule setup on port 4711 to point to a Debian based box on my LAN.
How would I achieve the same effect on a linux box? If I run the bridge on the same box, does this negate the need for a rule?
If all this works, is there a restriction of one decnet area per lan segment? Can I run two areas on my side of the bridge?
Thanks for the help, Mark
Chimpy wont boot for some reason anymore.
I've reseated all the RAM, the CPU and PCI cards - but get nothing. Not even the diagnostic beeps.
Any ideas?
Sampsa
On 2011-09-07, at 8:06 AM, Brian Hechinger wrote:
On 9/7/2011 8:23 AM, Sampsa Laine wrote:
Hmm, it's working now? Any one else want to try it and see if the 503 was a random hamster dying or something?
Sampsa
PS: Make sure you use exactly this URL to log in:
http://rhesus.sampsa.com/ftalk/
On 6 Sep 2011, at 21:48, Ian McLaughlin wrote:
On 2011-09-06, at 12:56 PM, Sampsa Laine wrote:
http://rhesus.sampsa.com/ftalk/
I get a 503 Service Unavailable error. Did I break it?
Ian
I get: Error 324 (net::ERR_EMPTY_RESPONSE): The server closed the connection without sending any data.
-brian
I'm still getting "503 Service Unavailable Unable to connect to 188.220.63.2".
Ian
On 9/7/2011 8:23 AM, Sampsa Laine wrote:
Hmm, it's working now? Any one else want to try it and see if the 503 was a random hamster dying or something?
Sampsa
PS: Make sure you use exactly this URL to log in:
http://rhesus.sampsa.com/ftalk/
On 6 Sep 2011, at 21:48, Ian McLaughlin wrote:
On 2011-09-06, at 12:56 PM, Sampsa Laine wrote:
http://rhesus.sampsa.com/ftalk/
I get a 503 Service Unavailable error. Did I break it?
Ian
I get: Error 324 (net::ERR_EMPTY_RESPONSE): The server closed the connection without sending any data.
-brian
Mark,
Since my phone only allows topposting I've deleted the original text. Your question was how decnet devices get their names.
The letters indicate the controller, they tell you what hardware is in use. So UNA indicates a DEUNA and ESA an on board controller for a microVAX. After the hyphen follows the controller number, the first interface is nr 0.
VMS device names differ: two ethernet controllers may be called EWA0: and EWB0: in VMS and be known in NCP as EWA-0 and EWA-1.
The name for the circuit is the same for the line (AFAIK).
Serial interfaces (for DDCMP) or CI interfaces follow different rules.
Hans
Verzonden vanaf mijn draadloze BlackBerry -toestel
On 07/09/11 13:57, hvlems at zonnet.nl wrote:
Two options: 1 rerun Netconfig,
2 manually create the circuit EWA-1 and line EWA-1 (assuming that the current ones are called EWA-0).
Hans
------Origineel bericht------
Van: Mark Wickens
Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: [HECnet] New network card in the Alpha, how do I reconfigure DECNET?
Verzonden: 7 september 2011 14:30
Hi,
I've got an AlphaServer 300 running as a clustered satellite node from
an AlphaServer 1000A. The 300 has a built in DE450 network card (10MB).
I've augmented that with a PCI DE500 100MB network card.
My question is how I move DECnet off the old card (which is now
disconnected) to the new card.
I've tried running NETCONFIG but this doesn't seem to recognise the new
card.
The old card is EWA0: the new one EWB0:
The remote booting and cluster server are running fine, so the machine
boots OK off the new card, and I have reconfigured TCP/IP for the new
card, it's just DECNET I'm stumbling with.
The old card won't be connected to the network any more.
Thanks for the help, Mark.
Verzonden vanaf mijn draadloze BlackBerry -toestel
Thanks, I did re-run netconfig and it didn't seem to make any difference, but maybe I got caught in the make change/reboot trap.
I've just rebooted and it's working.
So for reference could I ask the question of how decnet associates a network controller with the decnet configuration?
Cheers, Mark
Two options: 1 rerun Netconfig,
2 manually create the circuit EWA-1 and line EWA-1 (assuming that the current ones are called EWA-0).
Hans
------Origineel bericht------
Van: Mark Wickens
Afzender: owner-hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Aan: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Beantwoorden: hecnet at Update.UU.SE
Onderwerp: [HECnet] New network card in the Alpha, how do I reconfigure DECNET?
Verzonden: 7 september 2011 14:30
Hi,
I've got an AlphaServer 300 running as a clustered satellite node from
an AlphaServer 1000A. The 300 has a built in DE450 network card (10MB).
I've augmented that with a PCI DE500 100MB network card.
My question is how I move DECnet off the old card (which is now
disconnected) to the new card.
I've tried running NETCONFIG but this doesn't seem to recognise the new
card.
The old card is EWA0: the new one EWB0:
The remote booting and cluster server are running fine, so the machine
boots OK off the new card, and I have reconfigured TCP/IP for the new
card, it's just DECNET I'm stumbling with.
The old card won't be connected to the network any more.
Thanks for the help, Mark.
Verzonden vanaf mijn draadloze BlackBerry -toestel
Hi,
I've got an AlphaServer 300 running as a clustered satellite node from an AlphaServer 1000A. The 300 has a built in DE450 network card (10MB). I've augmented that with a PCI DE500 100MB network card.
My question is how I move DECnet off the old card (which is now disconnected) to the new card.
I've tried running NETCONFIG but this doesn't seem to recognise the new card.
The old card is EWA0: the new one EWB0:
The remote booting and cluster server are running fine, so the machine boots OK off the new card, and I have reconfigured TCP/IP for the new card, it's just DECNET I'm stumbling with.
The old card won't be connected to the network any more.
Thanks for the help, Mark.
Hmm, it's working now? Any one else want to try it and see if the 503 was a random hamster dying or something?
Sampsa
PS: Make sure you use exactly this URL to log in:
http://rhesus.sampsa.com/ftalk/
On 6 Sep 2011, at 21:48, Ian McLaughlin wrote:
On 2011-09-06, at 12:56 PM, Sampsa Laine wrote:
http://rhesus.sampsa.com/ftalk/
I get a 503 Service Unavailable error. Did I break it?
Ian
At 12:31 AM +0200 9/7/11, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2011-09-07 00:21, Zane H. Healy wrote:
At 11:48 PM +0200 9/6/11, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Does anyone have sources to RMS-11 V2.0. Specifically for RSX, in case
they differ.
I don't believe I have that in my archives.
(And no, the TCP/IP is not available for distribution yet, but might
be in the future, depending on interest and so on...)
Is this your own TCP/IP implementation or the one from Process Software?
This is my. Process Software's is much less capable. Not to mention slower. :-)
I'd be inclined to say agonizingly slow on a PDP-11/73 running RSX-11M+ V4.6. Time to release your version! ;-)
Zane
--
| Zane H. Healy | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com | OpenVMS Enthusiast |
| | Photographer |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
| My flickr Photostream |
| http://www.flickr.com/photos/33848088 at N03/ |
Sampsa -
The cables are in the mail. The total for shipping was Can$ 8.98 all in, so if you want to send me Can$ 32 at your convenience, you can paypal this e-mail address.
No tracking number - just letter post, small padded envelope.
I tested them before sending, but if there's any trouble or they don't arrive, please let me know.
Cheers,
Phil
On 2011-09-07 00:21, Zane H. Healy wrote:
At 11:48 PM +0200 9/6/11, Johnny Billquist wrote:
Does anyone have sources to RMS-11 V2.0. Specifically for RSX, in case
they differ.
I don't believe I have that in my archives.
(And no, the TCP/IP is not available for distribution yet, but might
be in the future, depending on interest and so on...)
Is this your own TCP/IP implementation or the one from Process Software?
This is my. Process Software's is much less capable. Not to mention slower. :-)
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at softjar.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol